Persuasive evidence of efforts by political groups to preserve and utilize loose election securities to commit massive election fraud

[mark francis]

Crooks object to voting security measures like clean voter registries, voter IDs, proof of citizenship before voting, independent examinations of voting machines before and after elections, enforcement of mail-in ballot verifications, so forth. This film promotes voting securities that all Americans should favor and will favor if they are honest.

Daily Caller’s ‘Rigged’ Reveals Radical Steps Democrats Have Taken To Undermine Elections | The Daily Caller 2-2-24

 

[Boris Norris]

What a load of rubbish.
Is that the best you've got?

 

[pjmret]

Crooks object to voting security measures like clean voter registries, voter IDs, proof of citizenship before voting, independent examinations of voting machines before and after elections, enforcement of mail-in ballot verifications, so forth. This film promotes voting securities that all Americans should favor and will favor if they are honest.

Daily Caller’s ‘Rigged’ Reveals Radical Steps Democrats Have Taken To Undermine Elections | The Daily Caller 2-2-24

if it were "persuavive proof" you'd persuade a judge. lol.
but you morons can't

 

[mark francis]

if it were "persuavive proof" you'd persuade a judge. lol.
but you morons can't

You cannot speak for judges. If a judge wishes to refute the persuasive presentation, then let him do it himself.

 

[pjmret]

You cannot speak for judges. If a judge wishes to refute the persuasive presentation, then let him do it himself.

judges dont refute evidence. I dont have to speak for them to know how judges work.
since i'm not a legal ***** like you

 

[mark francis]

judges dont refute evidence. I dont have to speak for them to know how judges work.
since i'm not a legal ***** like you

Courts have not refuted evidence of fraud and Democrats cannot refute evidence of fraud so the evidence of 2020 voting fraud stands as unrefuted evidence of the Democrat theft of the 2020 election.

 

[pjmret]

Courts have not refuted evidence of fraud and Democrats cannot refute evidence of fraud so the evidence of 2020 voting fraud stands as unrefuted evidence of the Democrat theft of the 2020 election.

right, courts dont do that, so it doesn't prove anything
you keep posting the dumbest legal stupidity. lol
yoiu are a legal ***** lol

 

[Boris Norris]

Courts have not refuted evidence of fraud and Democrats cannot refute evidence of fraud so the evidence of 2020 voting fraud stands as unrefuted evidence of the Democrat theft of the 2020 election.

What evidence? Same old shit you've been belching for 3 years and never took a sentence to the police.
You've got nothing but hate and bile and delusions.