Why current reliance on the accuracy of election results in the US is impossible

[mark francis]

First you said elections in general cannot be trusted but when you were cornered like a wet rat facing with the possibility that Trump 2016 was fraudulent you change your tune.

Your assessment is flawed.

 

[pjmret]

If no court ruled on the admissability of ballots dumped into big democrat election wards without their required chain of custody records does that mean to you that no ballots were dumped into election wards without the proper verifications of legitimacy?

So no court ruled they were suspect
It's just whin8ng lol

 

[mark francis]

prove there was massive fraudulant votes. lol.
god you are so stupid.

A moutain of evidence of massive 2020 voting fraud stands in unrefuted condemnation of the fraud in the 2020 election.

 

[pjmret]

A moutain of evidence of massive 2020 voting fraud stands in unrefuted condemnation of the fraud in the 2020 election.

So no proof
God you are stupid lol

 

[Boris Norris]

Not a single court or judge submitted a relaible ruling or declaration that no massive voting fraud occurred in the 2020 election.,

Again, that is not the courts job. If the evidence they presented were conclusive the court would no doubt take the case.
The brief clearly showed it was a revenge defence which means fuck all in a court.

 

[mark francis]

But it doesn't because you never proved any and courts dont disprove anything. You lose again.

Not a single US court ruled that no significant amount of fraud occurred in 2020.

It was Trump who said "fight like hell" on j6. Stop switching the blame. You're a liar.

Democratrs used the term 'fight like hell' when referring to their fight against conservitives and Christians in the US long before Trump used the term.

The Democrat party did not stop one investigation. Before you show your link, ensure it was the democrat party itself.

Democrats 'fought like hell' against efforts by republicans to examine 2020 voting machines before democrats could erase information on them that they were erasing when a Georgia judge ordered them to stop erasing data from the unexamined machines.

 

[mark francis]

I am sure you are too stupid to understand simple posts lol
You mooorons lost every court case lololololol

Courts did reject voting fraud cases by the dozens for various reasons but you continually deny the fact that not a single court in the US ruled that significant voting fraud did not occur in 2020.

 

[pjmret]

Courts did reject voting fraud cases by the dozens for various reasons but you continually deny the fact that not a single court in the US ruled that significant voting fraud did not occur in 2020.

I never denied that because it's not what courts do duh
God you make regular mooorons look smart lol

 

[mark francis]

And no court in the nation proved it did and neither did you or the GOP.

The evidence does not have to be proven to charge democrats with criminal unjust imprisonment of patriotic Americans for questioning the accuracy of the 2020 elkection. Democrats must first prove the evidence of fraud is invalid before they can legally jail their opponents for seeking proof that the voting fraud evidence is invalid.

 

[pjmret]

The evidence does not have to be proven to charge democrats with criminal unjust imprisonment of patriotic Americans for questioning the accuracy of the 2020 elkection. Democrats must prove the evidence of fraud is invalid before they can legally jail their opponents for seeking proof that the voting fraud evidence is invalid.

Who was imprisoned merely for questioning, lying mooron lol
Name names but you won't as always

 

[mark francis]

So no court ruled they were suspect
It's just whin8ng lol

It does not matter what judges may or may not have thought about the evidence. No judge ruled the widespread evidence of election fraud was invalid.

 

[pjmret]

It does not matter what judges may or may not have thought about the evidence. No judge ruled the widespread evidence of election fraud was invalid.

It doesn't matter what judges think about evidence? Uh,nthats actually their job lol
Omg you are so stupid lol

 

[mark francis]

So no proof
God you are stupid lol

Lacking investigative proof resulting from strong democrat oppositions to voting fraud investigations does not mean no voting fraud occurred.

 

[pjmret]

Lacking investigative proof resulting from strong democrat oppositions to voting fraud investigations does not mean no voting fraud occurred.

If you have no proof after 4 years especially in red states it shows you are stupid anti-American liars lol

 

[mark francis]

Again, that is not the courts job.

Exactly. Stop trying to drag courts into democrat false claims that no significant fraud occurred in spite of all the evidence to the contrary.