Ambassador Sondland supports Trump in spite of J-6 because he believes democrats have done worse damage than was done on J-6

[mark francis]

Can you point to one instance where a person changed a vote to suit Biden and was convicted of it.

We do not have access to voting machines the democrats claimed were vulnerable to election fraud.

 

[mark francis]

Name one court that refused to hear them in the open.

No court tried the evidence before a jury. If you claim I am wrong about that all you have to do is prove me wrong.

 

[pjmret]

Leftist judges can be counted on to persecute good people and to cover up crimes like voting fraud.

nothing to do with bench vs jury trials.
you must enjoy looking stupid.

 

[pjmret]

No court tried the evidence before a jury. If you claim I am wrong about that all you have to do is prove me wrong.

these cases dont go to juries.
its amusing you keep repeating your "point" as if it does anything but make you look stupid. lol

 

[Boris Norris]

No court tried the evidence before a jury. If you claim I am wrong about that all you have to do is prove me wrong.

I don't have to prove anything. You have to prove they had a viable for the court to hear.
To this point, 60 were chucked out for that very reason. Get over it.

 

[Boris Norris]

We do not have access to voting machines the democrats claimed were vulnerable to election fraud.

So you don't have evidence yet now you switch to blaming democrats.

You're a loser old man.

 

[mark francis]

nothing to do with bench vs jury trials.
you must enjoy looking stupid.

Judges bowed to intense leftist democrat pressure against investigating voting fraud or taking up voting fraud cases in court.

 

[pjmret]

Judges bowed to intense leftist democrat pressure against investigating voting fraud or taking up voting fraud cases in court.

judges dont investigate, they evaluate.

and they took them up.

why do you insist on looking stupid? its weird. lol

 

[mark francis]

these cases dont go to juries.
its amusing you keep repeating your "point" as if it does anything but make you look stupid. lol

No case will ever receive public evaluation and judgment if hidden from view by judges who refuse to expose the evidence to public examination in open court.

 

[pjmret]

No case will ever receive public evaluation and judgment if hidden from view by judges who refuse to expose the evidence to public examination in open court.

bench trials aren't hidden from view. evidence is presented in public by filings, available to everyone. lol

god you are so stupid.
why do you insist on being so stupid? its weird. lol

 

[mark francis]

I don't have to prove anything. You have to prove they had a viable for the court to hear.
To this point, 60 were chucked out for that very reason. Get over it.

You probably have no idea how many voting fraud cases were "chucked" because the judge said the plaintiffs had no right to bring the cases to court.

 

[mark francis]

So you don't have evidence yet now you switch to blaming democrats.

You're a loser old man.

You will never be able to prove democrats wrong who warned that Dominion machines were vulnerable to voting fraud manipulation in the 2020 election.

 

[mark francis]

judges dont investigate, they evaluate.

and they took them up.

why do you insist on looking stupid? its weird. lol

Judges refused to allow the American people to examine and evaluate the evidence, colluding with crooked democrats to cover up the evidence of fraud without allowing the evidence to be evaluated in open court.

 

[mark francis]

bench trials aren't hidden from view. evidence is presented in public by filings, available to everyone. lol

god you are so stupid.
why do you insist on being so stupid? its weird. lol

Courts failed miserably if they thought they had intended to air out evidence of voting fraud for the public to examine and evaluate.

 

[pjmret]

Judges refused to allow the American people to examine and evaluate the evidence, colluding with crooked democrats to cover up the evidence of fraud without allowing the evidence to be evaluated in open court.

nope. the evidence presented was in public filings. the judge evaluated it in open court.

my god you are stupid lol