Ambassador Sondland supports Trump in spite of J-6 because he believes democrats have done worse damage than was done on J-6

We will never know how many votes Hillary got were fake or illegal,
The same could be said for Trump but you remain silent on that.

but Biden is right, the democrats have perfected their voting fraud to the point that their fraud will never be arrested.
That is not what he suggested and you know it but I'm not surprised you'd say it. It's a very weak weapon.
 
Werbung:
Wars are inevitable when the devil is constantly fighting God, resulting in blind subjects of the devil fighting what is good in civilization.
God supposedly knows everything, including the future, so he should have known that Satan was going to be a problem before he created him. If God is knows it all, then he is clearly not very bright. If God is omnipotent, then he only has to give the orders and do away with the devil.

The Bible is full of silly stuff like this. Why anyone takes it seriously makes it clear that a lot of people that read the Bible are incapable of rational thought.

So God is NOT omniscient. IT is not possible to be stupid and omniscient at the same time. Think about it.
 
The same could be said for Trump but you remain silent on that.
We have a mountain of evidence of democrat voting fraud but very little evidence of republican fraud. For example, it was democrat precincts that banned republican observers from counting operations after polls had closed on election day.
 
We have a mountain of evidence of democrat voting fraud but very little evidence of republican fraud. For example, it was democrat precincts that banned republican observers from counting operations after polls had closed on election day.
well, its a mountain of something. lol.

it isn't credible or you mooorons would't have lost every court case, since courts are the determiner of credible evidence. duh.
 
well, its a mountain of something. lol.

it isn't credible or you mooorons would't have lost every court case, since courts are the determiner of credible evidence. duh.
Having cases thrown out of court on technical grounds is far from having evidence of voting fraud examined and refuted in an actual court trial. Democrat liars keep falsely claiming the evidence of voting fraud was disproven by courts when that is a lie and they know it.
 
Having cases thrown out of court on technical grounds is far from having evidence of voting fraud examined and refuted in an actual court trial. Democrat liars keep falsely claiming the evidence of voting fraud was disproven by courts when that is a lie and they know it.
Courts don't refute evidence
You are so stupid
It's amusing you don't mind being dumber than a box of rocks lol
 
Courts don't refute evidence
You are so stupid
It's amusing you don't mind being dumber than a box of rocks lol
Courts cannot refute irrefutable evidence and the fact that no courts took up 2020 voting fraud cases proves courts never disproved the evidence of fraud the courts refused to examine in court.
 
Courts cannot refute irrefutable evidence and the fact that no courts took up 2020 voting fraud cases proves courts never disproved the evidence of fraud the courts refused to examine in court.
Plenty of courts took them up
You are dumber than a box of rocks
 
We have a mountain of evidence of democrat voting fraud but very little evidence of republican fraud. For example, it was democrat precincts that banned republican observers from counting operations after polls had closed on election day.

Post the evidence now.
You've had 4 years to get it together and still nothing. I'll wait.
 
Plenty of courts took them up
You are dumber than a box of rocks
Of the many "plenty of courts" you claim "took up" voting fraud cases not one allowed the evidence to be heard in open court before witnesses. The democrat party is much like Putin's communist party in controlling public narratives to keep the public 'properly informed' according to party standards and narratives.
 
Of the many "plenty of courts" you claim "took up" voting fraud cases not one allowed the evidence to be heard in open court before witnesses. The democrat party is much like Putin's communist party in controlling public narratives to keep the public 'properly informed' according to party standards and narratives.

because cases like this dont work that way. its how the american court system works.
god you make rocks look smart. lol
 
Of the many "plenty of courts" you claim "took up" voting fraud cases not one allowed the evidence to be heard in open court before witnesses. The democrat party is much like Putin's communist party in controlling public narratives to keep the public 'properly informed' according to party standards and narratives.
Name one court that refused to hear them in the open.
 
Werbung:
Back
Top