Louisiana election cast out for fraud

Werbung:
Courts don't investigate voter fraud. They more than amply proved that in 2020.
Of course they don't. They usually wait until credible evidence is presented.
Have you noticed the evidence of jack Smith's?
Of course not because you haven't the guts to read the indictment.
 
Of course they don't. They usually wait until credible evidence is presented.
Have you noticed the evidence of jack Smith's?
Of course not because you haven't the guts to read the indictment.
Jack Smith is hiding evidence from Congress. All the leftists are in bed with each other to cover Biden's sins and create imaginative twisted charges with which to try to destroy Trump from their years of built-up envy and hatred.
 
Jack Smith is hiding evidence from Congress. All the leftists are in bed with each other to cover Biden's sins and create imaginative twisted charges with which to try to destroy Trump from their years of built-up envy and hatred.
Yep. They are bloody good at it too. God won't help the idiot now.
 
you keep saying something that no one argues with as if it means something. lol.
you are so stupid.
republicans lose cases to deep state judges all the time. That does not mean deep state judges can disprove the mountain of evidence of widespread leftist voter fraud in 2020, because they cannot. They don't even try to disprove the evidence of fraud. They just find ways and excuses for dismissing the cases before they go to court.
 
Oh I do hope so. The country deserves it.
You may be right. The US, like Sodom and Gomorrah in ancient history, may deserve for the ungodly to illegally seize control of the nation for its support of ungodliness and wickedness, allowing the thieves and robbers to brutally oppress those that oppose ungodliness.
 
republicans lose cases to deep state judges all the time. That does not mean deep state judges can disprove the mountain of evidence of widespread leftist voter fraud in 2020, because they cannot. They don't even try to disprove the evidence of fraud. They just find ways and excuses for dismissing the cases before they go to court.
Prove they are deep state judges liar lol
 
You may be right. The US, like Sodom and Gomorrah in ancient history, may deserve for the ungodly to illegally seize control of the nation for its support of ungodliness and wickedness, allowing the thieves and robbers to brutally oppress those that oppose ungodliness.
Oh yes. God will come and make us all pay.
What a load of shyt. Grow up you old fool.
 
republicans lose cases to deep state judges all the time. That does not mean deep state judges can disprove the mountain of evidence of widespread leftist voter fraud in 2020, because they cannot. They don't even try to disprove the evidence of fraud. They just find ways and excuses for dismissing the cases before they go to court.
What evidence?
Same old argument again?

You've been stealing the altar wine.
 
The US has always had crooks committing voting fraud in elections and probably always will. The Democrat won by one vote and demanded the election be certified in spite of fraud, but that was not to be, thank God. Crooked elections should never be certified to allow crooks to steal elections. Democrats that win crooked elections tend to demand that the election be certified, and the fraud ignored. That is because crooks want to win whether fairly or unfairly.

Democrat Election Win Declared Void After Voter Fraud Discovered (msn.com) 12-6-23

Democrat Election Win Declared Void After Voter Fraud Discovered

A number of votes were found to be invalid, according to a ruling by Justice Bleich© BluIz60/iStock / Getty Images Plus

Ajudge has ruled an extremely tight election between Republicans and Democrats for a Louisiana parish sheriff is void because of voter fraud.

The race to become Caddo Parish sheriff was closely fought between Democrat Henry Whitehorn and Republican John Nickelson. In November, a recount was ordered after Whitehorn won by just one vote in an election that saw over 43,000 ballots cast. The recount found three additional votes for each candidate and Whitehorn was declared the winner.

Both Nickelson and Whitehorn have been approached for comment by Newsweek.

Nickelson filed a lawsuit and retired Louisiana Supreme Court Justice E. Joseph Bleich declared the result void on Tuesday. Nickelson's suit said the count was done too quickly and could not be accurate, while ballots cast by people twice through mail-in and in-person ballots were discovered, NBC affiliate KTAL reported. Bleich was assigned to the case after four judges recused themselves due to their friendships with Nickelson.

In all, Bleich said that two people voted twice, five mail-in ballots should not have been counted for failure to comply with the law, and there were a further four invalid votes by interdicted persons who were unqualified voters.

Bleich wrote: "This runoff election involved a one-vote margin. It was proven beyond any doubt that there were at least 11 illegal votes cast and counted. It is legally impossible to know what the true vote should have been."

A new runoff has now been called, causing Whitehorn to comment that, "The judiciary should not decide elections." His team has appealed Bleich's decision to the second circuit court of appeal and says it will take it to the state Supreme Court if necessary.

In a statement, Whitehorn said: "Of course I am disappointed about the court's decision to overturn the will of the people of Caddo Parish. I was always taught that the person with the most votes wins, even if that's by a thousand votes or by one vote."

Whitehorn questioned the ruling, saying, "The rules of the game are different depending on who the players are." He continued: "I won the sheriff's race, not once, but twice. My opponent conveniently chose to question the integrity of the election only after he lost, not once, but twice. In elections, you should not be given a redo simply because you are unhappy with the results."

Nickelson said the decision was a "victory for election integrity" and that he was looking forward to the runoff scheduled for March.


Correction, 12/6/23, 8:30 a.m. ET: The headline on this article was updated to remove the word "widespread" when describing the voter fraud.
Please think about the frauds in voting and not the mouths of those who supported trump like you not worthy of their falsies.
 
Werbung:
Back
Top