Leftist polls lie in support of widespread democrat voting fraud

[mark francis]

There are certain tools in the corrupt democrat political chest that are almost essential for democrats to pull off voting fraud. Trump was publicly far more popular than Biden in 2020 but the left convinced Americans by doctored or biased polls that what they saw in public was not actually true, thus lending support to democrat efforts to fool Americans into believing the election plagued by fraud was actually the most honest, accurate and secure election in US history.

Another valuable tool in the democrat bag of tricks is the bloated voter registry that falsely gives the impression that there are far more registwered democrats than really exist in democrat voting wards. That sllows democrats to insert fake ballots in elections that do not exceed the actual numbers of voters registered in those precincts, even though several precincts in 2020 still turned in vote totals that exceeded the number of voters on the rolls (the registries were 'updated' after the election to bring those excessive numbers back down.

Another crooked trick in the democrat bag is the illegal American voter who becomes registerted to vote without any examination of legitimacy before votes are illegally cast and counted.

 

[pjmret]

you you do is whine. lol.
and post vague right wing blather

 

[Wry Catcher]

Take the Preamble to read and become to We The People to vote in these words!​

It is a contract to read and consider The Preamble to our Constitution, especially the members of the House of Represent, the Senate and the members of the Supreme Court and voters of America:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
At this time, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the six other justices, McConnell in the Senate and the Republican Speaker of The House ignore The Preamble.

We the Voters must read and consider the words in the Preamble above and must vote, and the Republicans' must read too, you above who read this thread and all of the voters of this Platform:

Republican Party Platform of 1956 | The American Presidency Project​

www.presidency.ucsb.edu

 

[Gus Dad1]

There are certain tools in the corrupt democrat political chest that are almost essential for democrats to pull off voting fraud. Trump was publicly far more popular than Biden in 2020 but the left convinced Americans by doctored or biased polls that what they saw in public was not actually true, thus lending support to democrat efforts to fool Americans into believing the election plagued by fraud was actually the most honest, accurate and secure election in US history.

Another valuable tool in the democrat bag of tricks is the bloated voter registry that falsely gives the impression that there are far more registwered democrats than really exist in democrat voting wards. That sllows democrats to insert fake ballots in elections that do not exceed the actual numbers of voters registered in those precincts, even though several precincts in 2020 still turned in vote totals that exceeded the number of voters on the rolls (the registries were 'updated' after the election to bring those excessive numbers back down.

Another crooked trick in the democrat bag is the illegal American voter who becomes registerted to vote without any examination of legitimacy before votes are illegally cast and counted.

So much lying and butthurt whining!

 

[mark francis]

So much lying and butthurt whining!

Denying the truth is a far cry from debunking the truth.

 

[pjmret]

Denying the truth is a far cry from debunking the truth.

Making claims and cowardly refusing to prove them is a far cry from prov8ng them

 

[mark francis]

Making claims and cowardly refusing to prove them is a far cry from prov8ng them

Why do democrats get so animated while defending corrupt bloated voting records? Because the democrat party has depended for so long on voting fraud that it becomes a matter of life and death to their party to keep avenues for voting fraud open.

• Judicial Watch sues NYC over bloated voter rolls, Judicial Watch 1-6-22
• California forced to clean up dirty rolls, USA Daily 1-7-19
• Massive Voter Roll cleanup in LA, Judicial Watch, G-mail
• Colorado agrees to clean up voter rolls, Judicial Watch 3-30-23
• Cloward Piven strategy to bloat voter rolls to collapse the system, Global Dispatch 8-14-11
• It's Official: Texas Resigns from Democrat Operative-founded ERIC Voter Registration System- 9 States Out - Only 23 Remain | The Gateway Pundit | by Brian Lupo 7-20-23
• Maryland Election Board Quietly Changes Rules, Threatens Legal Action Against Those Who Challenge Elections Based on Voter Rolls | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft 9-2-23
• Voter Rolls and Voter Purging - Rock the Vote 9-22-22
• DC Removing 103,000 Ineligible Names from the Voter Rolls in Response to Judicial Watch | Judicial Watch
• Michigan’s Secretary of State Fights to Keep Dead on Voter Rolls | The Heritage Foundation 8-31-22
• Judicial Watch Sues State of Illinois for Refusing to Disclose Voter Roll Data in Violation of Federal Law | Judicial Watch 9-21-20
• New Judicial Watch Study Finds 353 U.S. Counties in 29 States with Voter Registration Rates Exceeding 100% | Judicial Watch 10-16-20

 

[Gus Dad1]

Denying the truth is a far cry from debunking the truth.

You posted no “truth”. Just lying and butthurt whining.

 

[pjmret]

Why do democrats get so animated while defending corrupt bloated voting records? Because the democrat party has depended for so long on voting fraud that it becomes a matter of life and death to their party to keep avenues for voting fraud open.

• Judicial Watch sues NYC over bloated voter rolls, Judicial Watch 1-6-22
• California forced to clean up dirty rolls, USA Daily 1-7-19
• Massive Voter Roll cleanup in LA, Judicial Watch, G-mail
• Colorado agrees to clean up voter rolls, Judicial Watch 3-30-23
• Cloward Piven strategy to bloat voter rolls to collapse the system, Global Dispatch 8-14-11
• It's Official: Texas Resigns from Democrat Operative-founded ERIC Voter Registration System- 9 States Out - Only 23 Remain | The Gateway Pundit | by Brian Lupo 7-20-23
• Maryland Election Board Quietly Changes Rules, Threatens Legal Action Against Those Who Challenge Elections Based on Voter Rolls | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft 9-2-23
• Voter Rolls and Voter Purging - Rock the Vote 9-22-22
• DC Removing 103,000 Ineligible Names from the Voter Rolls in Response to Judicial Watch | Judicial Watch
• Michigan’s Secretary of State Fights to Keep Dead on Voter Rolls | The Heritage Foundation 8-31-22
• Judicial Watch Sues State of Illinois for Refusing to Disclose Voter Roll Data in Violation of Federal Law | Judicial Watch 9-21-20
• New Judicial Watch Study Finds 353 U.S. Counties in 29 States with Voter Registration Rates Exceeding 100% | Judicial Watch 10-16-20

Which of those proved the election was stolen in a court case you won? Lol
Nothing there about fraud at all
God you are stupid lol

 

[Gus Dad1]

Why do democrats get so animated while defending corrupt bloated voting records? Because the democrat party has depended for so long on voting fraud that it becomes a matter of life and death to their party to keep avenues for voting fraud open.

• Judicial Watch sues NYC over bloated voter rolls, Judicial Watch 1-6-22
• California forced to clean up dirty rolls, USA Daily 1-7-19
• Massive Voter Roll cleanup in LA, Judicial Watch, G-mail
• Colorado agrees to clean up voter rolls, Judicial Watch 3-30-23
• Cloward Piven strategy to bloat voter rolls to collapse the system, Global Dispatch 8-14-11
• It's Official: Texas Resigns from Democrat Operative-founded ERIC Voter Registration System- 9 States Out - Only 23 Remain | The Gateway Pundit | by Brian Lupo 7-20-23
• Maryland Election Board Quietly Changes Rules, Threatens Legal Action Against Those Who Challenge Elections Based on Voter Rolls | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft 9-2-23
• Voter Rolls and Voter Purging - Rock the Vote 9-22-22
• DC Removing 103,000 Ineligible Names from the Voter Rolls in Response to Judicial Watch | Judicial Watch
• Michigan’s Secretary of State Fights to Keep Dead on Voter Rolls | The Heritage Foundation 8-31-22
• Judicial Watch Sues State of Illinois for Refusing to Disclose Voter Roll Data in Violation of Federal Law | Judicial Watch 9-21-20
• New Judicial Watch Study Finds 353 U.S. Counties in 29 States with Voter Registration Rates Exceeding 100% | Judicial Watch 10-16-20

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE​

A questionable source exhibits one or moreof the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section of that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate Judicial Watch Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories, and an abysmal fact-check record.

---

Detailed Report​

Reasoning: Conspiracy, Propaganda, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History​

Founded in 1994 by Larry Klayman, Judicial Watch (JW) is an American conservative activist group that files Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits to investigate government officials’ alleged misconduct. They primarily target Democrats such as the Clinton’s, Obama, and climate scientists as they label climate science “fraud science.” Judicial Watch has made numerous false and unsubstantiated claims, with a “vast majority” of their lawsuits dismissed. They describe themselves as “a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation that promotes transparency, accountability, and integrity in government, politics, and the law.” The current President of JW is Tom Fitton.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership​

Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization with contributions from individuals, foundations, and corporations. According to Sourcewatch, JW receives funding from prominent right-wing organizations such as the Carthage Foundation and Scaife Foundation.

Analysis / Bias​

Judicial Watch reports news on their website using strong emotional language, usually pro-right or anti-left. Typical topics covered are anti-immigration, in which they highlight crimes committed by illegal immigrants, such as this: Busy Month for Illegal Immigrants Committing Heinous Crimes or dedicating an entire website to exposing former President Obama’s alleged IRS scandal.

They have also promoted debunked conspiracy theories such as this. Further, the founder of JW, Larry Klayman, recently promoted the conspiracy that the Clintons were killing people. Finally, they routinely promote conspiracy theories claimed by Former President Trump that are usually debunked. See failed fact checks below. Generally, most content and story selection is anti-left and not always factual.

---

---

Failed Fact Checks​

• DHS Quietly Moving, Releasing ‘Vanloads’ of ‘Illegal Aliens’ Away from Border – FALSE
• Has Nancy Pelosi spent $100,000 on food, booze, and “partying” during her air travel? – FALSE
• Judicial Watch says ISIS operating a camp in Mexico–near El Paso – FALSE
• ‘Islamic Refugee’ with Gas Pipeline Plans Arrested in New Mexico Border County – FALSE
• Did the IRS ‘Fast Track’ Tax-Exempt Status for ‘After School Satan’ Clubs? – FALSE
• “More than 100,000 DACA applicants have been arrested—Murder, Rape, DUI.” – MOSTLY FALSE
• Did a legal settlement between Judicial Watch and California election officials prove that one million illegal votes were cast in the 2018 elections in California? – FALSE
• Donald Trump was allowed to destroy classified documents – MOSTLY FALSE

Overall, we rate Judicial Watch Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories, and an abysmal fact-check record. (7/19/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 02/21/2024)

Judicial Watch – Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Would be very difficult to find a worse choice than “Judicial Watch” (gatewaypundit or epoch times run about equal) to support any right wing argument.

 

[mark francis]

Which of those proved the election was stolen in a court case you won? Lol
Nothing there about fraud at all
God you are stupid lol

I never presented any evidence to courts. That is the job of government officials willing to do the right thing. Courts did not always look on the crime of voting fraud as a crime when committed by democrats for the democrat party.

• Courts are cracking down on fraud, Wash Examiner 9-19-22
• Judge rejects claim of elections violations in Detroit, usnews.com 11-7-22
• Judge in Wayne County rejects evidence and refuses to halt certification of election, Gateway Pundit 11-13-20
• District judge halts 3 Georgia counties from erasing Dominion voting machine data | Fox News 11-30-20
• Federal judge orders Georgia officials not to wipe, reset or alter Dominion voting machines (bizpacreview.com) 11-30-20
• Judge directs state officials not to reset Georgia voting machines | The Hill 11-30-20
• FACT CHECK: Did No Court Consider Evidence Of Election Fraud In The 2020 Elections? | Check Your Fact 11-1-22
• https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/jan/08/joe-biden/joe-biden-right-more-60-trumps-election-lawsuits-l/ 1-8-21

 

[mark francis]

View attachment 15235

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE​

A questionable source exhibits one or moreof the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section of that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate Judicial Watch Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories, and an abysmal fact-check record.

---

Detailed Report​

Reasoning: Conspiracy, Propaganda, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History​

Founded in 1994 by Larry Klayman, Judicial Watch (JW) is an American conservative activist group that files Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits to investigate government officials’ alleged misconduct. They primarily target Democrats such as the Clinton’s, Obama, and climate scientists as they label climate science “fraud science.” Judicial Watch has made numerous false and unsubstantiated claims, with a “vast majority” of their lawsuits dismissed. They describe themselves as “a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation that promotes transparency, accountability, and integrity in government, politics, and the law.” The current President of JW is Tom Fitton.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership​

Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization with contributions from individuals, foundations, and corporations. According to Sourcewatch, JW receives funding from prominent right-wing organizations such as the Carthage Foundation and Scaife Foundation.

Analysis / Bias​

Judicial Watch reports news on their website using strong emotional language, usually pro-right or anti-left. Typical topics covered are anti-immigration, in which they highlight crimes committed by illegal immigrants, such as this: Busy Month for Illegal Immigrants Committing Heinous Crimes or dedicating an entire website to exposing former President Obama’s alleged IRS scandal.

They have also promoted debunked conspiracy theories such as this. Further, the founder of JW, Larry Klayman, recently promoted the conspiracy that the Clintons were killing people. Finally, they routinely promote conspiracy theories claimed by Former President Trump that are usually debunked. See failed fact checks below. Generally, most content and story selection is anti-left and not always factual.

---

---

Failed Fact Checks​

• DHS Quietly Moving, Releasing ‘Vanloads’ of ‘Illegal Aliens’ Away from Border – FALSE
• Has Nancy Pelosi spent $100,000 on food, booze, and “partying” during her air travel? – FALSE
• Judicial Watch says ISIS operating a camp in Mexico–near El Paso – FALSE
• ‘Islamic Refugee’ with Gas Pipeline Plans Arrested in New Mexico Border County – FALSE
• Did the IRS ‘Fast Track’ Tax-Exempt Status for ‘After School Satan’ Clubs? – FALSE
• “More than 100,000 DACA applicants have been arrested—Murder, Rape, DUI.” – MOSTLY FALSE
• Did a legal settlement between Judicial Watch and California election officials prove that one million illegal votes were cast in the 2018 elections in California? – FALSE
• Donald Trump was allowed to destroy classified documents – MOSTLY FALSE

Overall, we rate Judicial Watch Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories, and an abysmal fact-check record. (7/19/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 02/21/2024)

Judicial Watch – Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Would be very difficult to find a worse choice than “Judicial Watch” (gatewaypundit or epoch times run about equal) to support any right wing argument.

You are right to suggest there are many media sources out there who will lie to protect their political party and agenda.

 

[pjmret]

I never presented any evidence to courts. That is the job of government officials willing to do the right thing. Courts did not always look on the crime of voting fraud as a crime when committed by democrats for the democrat party.

• Courts are cracking down on fraud, Wash Examiner 9-19-22
• Judge rejects claim of elections violations in Detroit, usnews.com 11-7-22
• Judge in Wayne County rejects evidence and refuses to halt certification of election, Gateway Pundit 11-13-20
• District judge halts 3 Georgia counties from erasing Dominion voting machine data | Fox News 11-30-20
• Federal judge orders Georgia officials not to wipe, reset or alter Dominion voting machines (bizpacreview.com) 11-30-20
• Judge directs state officials not to reset Georgia voting machines | The Hill 11-30-20
• FACT CHECK: Did No Court Consider Evidence Of Election Fraud In The 2020 Elections? | Check Your Fact 11-1-22
• https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/jan/08/joe-biden/joe-biden-right-more-60-trumps-election-lawsuits-l/ 1-8-21

yes, courts rejected evidence that wasn't credible. its what courts do,
god you are stupid. lol

 

[mark francis]

yes, courts rejected evidence that wasn't credible. its what courts do,
god you are stupid. lol

Whatever evidence that was presented to them and rejected by them was flimsy at best, considering the fact that the biased courts were all done with their phony rejections of voter fraud within a month after the election.

https://www.foxnews.com/transcript/why-dont-democrats-want-to-investigate-potential-election-fraud
Why don't Democrats want to investigate potential election fraud? | Fox News

All right. Tonight, the deadline for Georgia's recount is less than three

hours away. Still at this hour, voters in the Peach State have more

questions than answers and thousands of uncounted ballots, most of which

were cast for President Trump, they've just been turning up all week.

Fayette County, 2,755 ballots just unearthed. Another 284 were discovered

in Walton County. This all in addition to the 2,600 uncounted ballots in

Floyd County that were discovered just a couple of days ago. If you're

keeping track, that's over 5,600 uncounted votes located in the past week,

two weeks later.

Now, in a state with a razor-thin margin of now just over 12,000, that is a

serious problem. Always want to have faith, trust, confidence in our

election system.

But the issues in Georgia don't end there. One county, a purported human

error during the recount, might have given thousands of extra votes to Joe

Biden if not for one extremely attentive observer.

According to Georgia's Republican Party chairman, it was a 9,000-vote

discrepancy that was signed off by two officials in DeKalb County, Georgia,

and would not have been discovered but for the Republican observer. Well,

we didn't have observers that most of the states that's -- whose legal

statutory language says you can have one.

 

[pjmret]

Whatever evidence that was presented to them and rejected by them was flimsy at best, considering the fact that the biased courts were all done with their phony rejections of voter fraud within a month after the election.

https://www.foxnews.com/transcript/why-dont-democrats-want-to-investigate-potential-election-fraud
Why don't Democrats want to investigate potential election fraud? | Fox News

All right. Tonight, the deadline for Georgia's recount is less than three

hours away. Still at this hour, voters in the Peach State have more

questions than answers and thousands of uncounted ballots, most of which

were cast for President Trump, they've just been turning up all week.

Fayette County, 2,755 ballots just unearthed. Another 284 were discovered

in Walton County. This all in addition to the 2,600 uncounted ballots in

Floyd County that were discovered just a couple of days ago. If you're

keeping track, that's over 5,600 uncounted votes located in the past week,

two weeks later.

Now, in a state with a razor-thin margin of now just over 12,000, that is a

serious problem. Always want to have faith, trust, confidence in our

election system.

But the issues in Georgia don't end there. One county, a purported human

error during the recount, might have given thousands of extra votes to Joe

Biden if not for one extremely attentive observer.

According to Georgia's Republican Party chairman, it was a 9,000-vote

discrepancy that was signed off by two officials in DeKalb County, Georgia,

and would not have been discovered but for the Republican observer. Well,

we didn't have observers that most of the states that's -- whose legal

statutory language says you can have one.

and courts laughed at your "evidence". because it wasn't credible.