Nobody who is pro war can legitimately claim to be pro life.
It is a ridiculous position to hold.
Which is why Gipper is so good at holding it
I pointed this out to you earlier, and you obviously chose to ignore it. Care to try, and defend your position, using logic rather then irrational comments, and respond now?
"Using your form of "rational thought" then I guess we should just roll over, play dead, and let all who want to take over the country have their way.
Unless you can finds a way to fight the enemies of this country without killing innocent life that is.
Under your "logic" we would never have fought WW2, or even the Revolution, the War of 1812, etc.
Still, while you decry the loss of innocent life in a time of war you support the taking of innocent life for the convenience of the "woman", and over 90% of abortions are for the convenience of the "woman", not out of any medical need, or because of rape.
When you say a lot of thought has gone into the decision, do you think the same for the ones that have had 3, 4, 5, abortions?
Then too, the very process you support has contributed to the sexual promiscuity that causes the situation to begin with. And you ignore that the groups that support abortion also support an end to parental rights, and refuse to name the adult that gets a child pregnant which is statuatory rape in every State. All for the sake of profit."
