"Shokin played the role of protecting the vested interest in the Ukrainian system," saidCarpenter, who traveled with Biden to Ukraine in 2015. "He never went after any corruptindividuals at all, never prosecuted any high-profile cases of corruption."That demonstrated that Poroshenko's administration was not sincereabout tackling corruption and building strong, independent law enforcement agencies, saidHeather Conley, director of the Europe program at the Center for Strategic and InternationalStudies, a Washington-based foreign policy think tank.
Shokin's office also stepped in to help Zlochevsky, the head of Burisma.British authorities had frozen $23 million in a money-laundering probe, but Shokin's officefailed to send documents British authorities needed to prosecute Zlochevsky. The caseeventually unraveled and the assets were unfrozen.In October 2015, Ukrainians staged a protest outside Poroshenko's home calling for Shokin'sremoval.
"Rather than supporting Ukraine's reforms and working to root out corruption," Pyatt said,"corrupt actors within the Prosecutor General’s Office are making things worse by openly andaggressively undermining reform."In October 2015, then-Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland told the Senate ForeignRelations committee the Prosecutor General's Office must lock up "dirty personnel" in itsown office.