Where Would We Be, Without Democratic Economies?????

Leftists fail to understand that if volcanoes are producing dangerous levels of CO2 then there is nothing to worry about since life has continued as it has for thousands of years in spite of volcanoes.

"if"? well, are they? i haven't seen credible evidence saying they DO, so feel free to prove it. duh.
 
Werbung:
Shutting down fossil fuels due to imagine dangers is creating real dangers with the resulting degradation of energy sources essential for modern living.

imagined dangers? did you "imagine" the heat this year? I sure didn't "imagine" it, it was real.
 
Co2 hasn't been a problem in the past? So what. Lol. We are talking about the future.

Until 1945 being blown up by nuclear weapons wasn't a problem either, I guess right wing logic says the Japanese victims weren't really hurt by them? Duh
Secularist scientists first predicted alarming rates of global cooling 50 years ago but that has since changed to the popular promotion that the earth is currently warming at a dangerous rate. Since early predictions all failed, we can only assume the hype about alleged global warming is fake but is nevertheless being pushed by secularists seeking to increase their own personal wealth by promising to stop the so-called impending disaster using generous funding for their own much-hyped 'essential world-saving research.'
 
.
My most-dramatic experience was at a brewery, in Boulder, CO.
.
A friend, of mine (and, the brewer, he knew, there) took me on a tour. Eventually, we came-upon one o' those plastic 55-gal. barrels, where the CO2 was being expelled. A hose, from the vat, ran into that barrel....that was (approx.) 2/3 filled with water. I was told..."Go ahead and take a hit outta that barrel!!" I'd assumed they were talking about a smell. When I put my face just-below the top-edge of the barrel...and, attempted to take a "hit"....I almost blacked-out...but, was caught, before I hit the floor. Because of it's density, that CO2 goes nowhere....except over the top-edge of the barrel, as volume increases.
.
Simple science: Plants breathe CO2 and produce oxygen. Humans breathe oxygen and produce CO2.
 
Secularist scientists first predicted alarming rates of global cooling 50 years ago but that has since changed to the popular promotion that the earth is currently warming at a dangerous rate. Since early predictions all failed, we can only assume the hype about alleged global warming is fake but is nevertheless being pushed by secularists seeking to increase their own personal wealth by promising to stop the so-called impending disaster using generous funding for their own much-hyped 'essential world-saving research.'
There was no consensus of global cooling then, it was mostly media stories

Try to pay attention
 
Secularist scientists first predicted alarming rates of global cooling 50 years ago but that has since changed to the popular promotion that the earth is currently warming at a dangerous rate. Since early predictions all failed, we can only assume the hype about alleged global warming is fake but is nevertheless being pushed by secularists seeking to increase their own personal wealth by promising to stop the so-called impending disaster using generous funding for their own much-hyped 'essential world-saving research.'

However, the clearest evidence the scientific consensus did not support the global cooling hypothesis in the 1970s is a 2008 study. It reviewed scientific literature from 1965 to 1979 and showed seven papers supported cooling, 20 were neutral and 44 backed global warming (Fig. 1, page 1333).

Since you clearly are a science ***** we can only laugh at your attemp to post science
 
wow, what a stupid post. lol

of course people understand how essential co2 is to plants. duh.

but TOO MUCH co2 is the problem here. More than the plants need so it builds up in the atmosphere and captures heat.

i hope someday a right wing person posts here who isn't a science *****, but so far, i'll have to keep hoping. lol
CO2 is not the problem; stupid leftist climate change propagandist hot air is.

1697393664974.webp
 
"if"? well, are they? i haven't seen credible evidence saying they DO, so feel free to prove it. duh.
Long Invisible, Research Shows Volcanic CO2 Levels Are Staggering (Op-Ed) | Live Science 10-15-13

... And we're getting there; the last twenty years have seen huge steps in our understanding of how, and how much CO2 leaves the deep Earth. But at the same time, a disturbing pattern has been emerging.

In 1992, it was thought that volcanic degassing released something like 100 million tons of CO2 each year. Around the turn of the millennium, this figure was getting closer to 200. The most recent estimate, released this February, comes from a team led by Mike Burton, of the Italian National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology – and it’s just shy of 600 million tons. It caps a staggering trend: A six-fold increase in just two decades.

These inflating figures, I hasten to add, don't mean that our planet is suddenly venting more CO2.

Humanity certainly is; but any changes to the volcanic background level would occur over generations, not years. The rise we’re seeing now, therefore, must have been there all along: As scientific progress is widening our perspective, the daunting outline of how little we really know about volcanoes is beginning to loom large.
 
Long Invisible, Research Shows Volcanic CO2 Levels Are Staggering (Op-Ed) | Live Science 10-15-13

... And we're getting there; the last twenty years have seen huge steps in our understanding of how, and how much CO2 leaves the deep Earth. But at the same time, a disturbing pattern has been emerging.

In 1992, it was thought that volcanic degassing released something like 100 million tons of CO2 each year. Around the turn of the millennium, this figure was getting closer to 200. The most recent estimate, released this February, comes from a team led by Mike Burton, of the Italian National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology – and it’s just shy of 600 million tons. It caps a staggering trend: A six-fold increase in just two decades.

These inflating figures, I hasten to add, don't mean that our planet is suddenly venting more CO2.

Humanity certainly is; but any changes to the volcanic background level would occur over generations, not years. The rise we’re seeing now, therefore, must have been there all along: As scientific progress is widening our perspective, the daunting outline of how little we really know about volcanoes is beginning to loom large.
Humans are 35 billion tons a year duhvolcanoes would be 2 percent lol
 
Werbung:
Back
Top