Where Would We Be, Without Democratic Economies?????

"In late July, I visited a steel mill in Gallatin, Kentucky, operated by the company Nucor. During my visit, I watched as the facility churned out massive rolls of low-carbon steel destined for use in renewable infrastructure. Nucor’s stock price has increased nearly five-fold in the last three years, and the day before I visited the company had announced blockbuster profits citing, in large part, all the demand created by businesses racing to take advantage of money flowing from federal spending programs, including and especially the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA).

Kentucky is far from alone. Across the country, the IRA has spurred hundreds of billions of dollars in investment in clean technology. Lithium-ion battery makers are opening factories near auto industry hubs to serve the growing electric vehicle market. Solar manufacturers are setting up shop in red states like Georgia. And old-school oil companies are investing in hydrogen.

“It's a
transformation of the economy,” says John Podesta, President Joe Biden’s senior advisor charged with implementing the IRA."
.
.
Bidenomics is already transforming America from a free and prosperous nation into a third-world socialist-fascist nation of equally poor slave-citizens to the tyrannical government run by illegitimate leftist oligarchs.

1691949326093.webp
 
Werbung:
.
"Since World War II, the United States economy has performed better on average under the administration of Democratic presidents than Republican presidents. The reasons for this are debated, and the observation applies to economic variables including job creation, GDP growth, stock market returns, personal income growth and corporate profits. The unemployment rate has fallen on average under Democratic presidents, while it has risen on average under Republican presidents. Budget deficits relative to the size of the economy were lower on average for Democratic presidents. Ten of the eleven U.S. recessions between 1953 and 2020 began under Republican presidents.

From 1948 through 2023, the party holding the presidency has changed hands ten times. Every time a
Republican took over from a Democrat, GDP growth fell.

Every time a Democrat took over from a Republican, GDP growth rose."
 
.
"Since World War II, the United States economy has performed better on average under the administration of Democratic presidents than Republican presidents. The reasons for this are debated, and the observation applies to economic variables including job creation, GDP growth, stock market returns, personal income growth and corporate profits. The unemployment rate has fallen on average under Democratic presidents, while it has risen on average under Republican presidents. Budget deficits relative to the size of the economy were lower on average for Democratic presidents. Ten of the eleven U.S. recessions between 1953 and 2020 began under Republican presidents.

From 1948 through 2023, the party holding the presidency has changed hands ten times. Every time a
Republican took over from a Democrat, GDP growth fell.

Every time a Democrat took over from a Republican, GDP growth rose."
1693236925446.webp
 
"The jobs market is holding steady as the country heads into the Labor Day weekend.

Employers added
187,000 jobs last month, marking a modest pickup from the previous month, the Labor Department said on Friday, with health care, hospitality, and construction among the sectors that added the most jobs."

.
tumblr_mhp7ghh1es1s2jx30o1_1280.jpg

.
 
.
cheering-clapping-smiley-emoticon.gif

.

REVERUNT FRANKIE.....GOT YOUR CHERRIES, RIGHT HERE!!!!!
.
image.jpg

.

GO, AHEAD, AND GORGE YOURSELF, AS USUAL!
WE'VE GOT
PLENTY....AS USUAL!!!!
.
good-afternoon-smiley-emoticon.gif

.​
 
Sadly for you mark, the stats cannot be ignored. Everything has improved since Joe shovelled that fat slop out of the WH.
All those favourable bullshyt lies told be Trump how he did wonderful things, were complete rubbish and now proven to be so.
But keep cherry picking isolated cases to satisfy your pathetic argument.
Not everybody is sad, apparently. Government hiring and payrolls are skyrocketing, as is the wealth of the super-rich under Biden.


Wealthiest Americans Get $195 Billion Richer in Biden’s First 100 Days​

The vaccine rollout, stimulus bill and rising stock market have helped ...
 
Not everybody is sad, apparently. Government hiring and payrolls are skyrocketing, as is the wealth of the super-rich under Biden.


Wealthiest Americans Get $195 Billion Richer in Biden’s First 100 Days​

The vaccine rollout, stimulus bill and rising stock market have helped ...
That's fine by me but don't forget Jarrod's 2 billion from the Saudis
 
Sadly for you mark, the stats cannot be ignored. Everything has improved since Joe shovelled that fat slop out of the WH.
All those favourable bullshyt lies told be Trump how he did wonderful things, were complete rubbish and now proven to be so.
But keep cherry picking isolated cases to satisfy your pathetic argument.
I grant that officials in N. Korea, China, and many other nations around the world tend to try to hide their problems from public view. Democrats in America do the same by trying to hide the serious downsides to Democrat and Biden policies and their ill effects over the last few years.

Homeless in America​

The homelessness crisis is getting worse.
 
I grant that officials in N. Korea, China, and many other nations around the world tend to try to hide their problems from public view. Democrats in America do the same by trying to hide the serious downsides to Democrat and Biden policies and their ill effects over the last few years.

Homeless in America​

The homelessness crisis is getting worse.
Notice the date?
Immediately after the pandemic but that wouldn't be responsible. It's those ungodly democrats again.
You're as predictable as night follows day. You're pathetic.
 
That's fine by me but don't forget Jarrod's 2 billion from the Saudis
At least Jarrod reported his legal earnings, unlike other rich people who hide their wealth in tax-exempt foundations with two sets of books, in secret foreign bank accounts, and/or scattered among a dozen family members with cash payments laundered through dozens of shady banks via hard to track transactions.
 
At least Jarrod reported his legal earnings, unlike other rich people who hide their wealth in tax-exempt foundations with two sets of books, in secret foreign bank accounts, and/or scattered among a dozen family members with cash payments laundered through dozens of shady banks via hard to track transactions.
He never earnt it dickhead.
He pleaded with them to gift it because he was Trump's son in law. He put it in some mysterious wealth fund he supposedly manages. He's had no experience in that area but took the money anyway.

Those scenarios you described fit the Trump cartel perfectly.
 
Notice the date?
Immediately after the pandemic but that wouldn't be responsible. It's those ungodly democrats again.
You're as predictable as night follows day. You're pathetic.
The date is given in the article (July 15, 2022) and I do not understand why you think this must have been Trump's fault. If you attribute current gains to Biden, then why do you insist on attributing current losses to Trump two years into Biden's illegitimate administration?
 
Werbung:
He never earnt it dickhead.
You have not proven your slanderous claim against an innocent man, you (vulgar man) yourself.
He pleaded with them to gift it because he was Trump's son in law. He put it in some mysterious wealth fund he supposedly manages. He's had no experience in that area but took the money anyway.
You accuse Jarrod of deceiving Saudis into giving him 2 billion dollars because he promoted his father-in-law? You clearly have very little respect for Saudi businesspeople, and that sounds like hateful blind biased discrimination and defamation.
Those scenarios you described fit the Trump cartel perfectly.
You should try to support all your accusations against Trump and his family and friends with actual facts instead of unsupported allegations.
 
Back
Top