Libsmasher
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2008
- Messages
- 3,151
That has got to be, without a doubt, one of the most mindless things I've read here.
Stick around - the resident Obamabots are capable of much worse.
That has got to be, without a doubt, one of the most mindless things I've read here.
That has got to be, without a doubt, one of the most mindless things I've read here. Take pride in the fact that you've now set the bar to an all time low. Call hearings, and punish people who had absolutely nothing to do with what happened.
Senator Obama has repeatedly complimented both the Clintons and agrees with them fully on the benefits of a surplus, rolling the Bush tax cuts for the rich back to Clinton administration levels and on the need to overhaul our healthcare system...
That's one thing that never-made-The-List.of course you do, you think sea should part for Clinton as well.
It's called Precedence.Fact is the Clinton's are working together quite well with the Obama campaign. And it's Bush that screwed us all over spending up to $12 BILLION DOLLARS per month on his invasion & occupation built on lies... tax cuts in time of war... and love of almost total deregulation. You run your economic house on unheard of big debt overseas and do some stupid things here at home and you get the Bush Republican economic catastrophe!
July 30, 1990 - "Mortgage foreclosures are soaring in the New York metropolitan region as growing numbers of property owners are overwhelmed by crushing real-estate debt.
Mortgage foreclosures are soaring in the New York metropolitan region as growing numbers of property owners are overwhelmed by crushing real-estate debt.
Just months after the giddy boom years of the 1980's, with their rising home values, generous bank lending policies and firm optimism about the regional economy, banks have started declaring defaults on thousands of delinquent mortgages and forcing owners to scramble for new financing or face property losses.
Officials in the region say they are stunned by the depth and suddenness of the increase in foreclosures."
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9c0ce2de1e38f933a05754c0a966958260
This is why we are having banking problems today. This law was put in after the Great Depression. Changed in 1999
Clinton Signs Legislation Overhauling Banking Laws
WASHINGTON, Nov. 12, 1999 (Reuters) - President Clinton signed into law today a sweeping overhaul of Depression-era banking laws. The measure lifts barriers in the industry and allows banks, securities firms and insurance companies to merge and sell each other's products.
"This legislation is truly historic," President Clinton told a packed audience of lawmakers and top financial regulators. "We have done right by the American people."
The bill repeals parts of the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act and the 1956 Bank Holding Company Act to level the domestic playing field for United States financial companies and allow them to compete better in the evolving global financial marketplace.
Analysts and industry leaders say the measure will probably fuel a wave of mergers as companies compete to build financial supermarkets offering all the services customers need under one roof.
Financial stocks were winners on Wall Street today, with J.P. Morgan & Company, Citigroup, American Express and Merrill Lynch all posting big gains. That helped the Dow Jones industrial average end up 174.02 points, at 10,769.32.
The Senate approved the final bill by 90 to 8 on Nov. 4 and the House followed suit by a vote of 362 to 57. Congress had previously made almost a dozen unsuccessful attempts over the last 25 years to revise the statutes, which had increasingly come to be viewed as anachronisms.
"The world changes, and Congress and the laws have to change with it," said Senator Phil Gramm of Texas, chairman of the Banking Committee and one of the bill's prime sponsors.
Opponents said it would have the opposite effect, creating behemoths that will raise fees, violate customers' privacy by sharing and selling their personal data, and put the stability of the financial system at risk.
The privacy issue was a key focus in the long and often heated negotiations that produced a compromise bill, and President Clinton made clear he still wanted to see more done to safeguard consumers' personal financial information.
Clinton's support for the legislation comes despite warnings from critics and consumer activists that it could lead to price-gouging of consumers and the erosion of their privacy by newly formed financial conglomerates that are too big and powerful.
"The bill is anti-consumer and anti-community," advocate Ralph Nader declared. "It will mean higher prices and fewer choices for low-, moderate- and middle-income families across the nation."
What's the full story? The full story was that in 1999 the Republicans had a veto overriding majority in Congress. John McCain's top economic advisor Phil Graham authored this legislation and pushed it through.
President Clinton trying to be centrist did sign the legislation but it would have been put into effect regardless.
Republicans came up with it... pushed it through and proudly announced they would override a Presidential veto if that were to happen.
Full story...
For most of America a vote for the Republicans is a Turkey voting for xmas.
And boy do they fit the bill.
Or should I say, beak
You don't know what you're talking about (as usual ) - that bill had absolutely nothing to do with the credit crisis, as has been thoroughly explained in this thread.
The Republican (Phil Graham/John McCain) take away all accountability in favor of deregulation led us down this path. I know it's extremely embarrassing for REPUBLICANT'S to admit... but you guys couldn't find a good economy and keep it with two hands and a flashlight!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trykOppmfiE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfcdEoYk8XM
The economy.
McCain says its base is "still strong"
One of Clinton's final acts as President was to sign into law the Commodity Futures Modernization Act that played a substantial role in bringing down Wall Street lest than 8 years later.This is why we are having banking problems today. This law was put in after the Great Depression. Changed in 1999
Clinton Signs Legislation Overhauling Banking Laws
WASHINGTON, Nov. 12, 1999 (Reuters) - President Clinton signed into law today a sweeping overhaul of Depression-era banking laws. The measure lifts barriers in the industry and allows banks, securities firms and insurance companies to merge and sell each other's products.
"This legislation is truly historic," President Clinton told a packed audience of lawmakers and top financial regulators. "We have done right by the American people."
The bill repeals parts of the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act and the 1956 Bank Holding Company Act to level the domestic playing field for United States financial companies and allow them to compete better in the evolving global financial marketplace.
Analysts and industry leaders say the measure will probably fuel a wave of mergers as companies compete to build financial supermarkets offering all the services customers need under one roof.
Financial stocks were winners on Wall Street today, with J.P. Morgan & Company, Citigroup, American Express and Merrill Lynch all posting big gains. That helped the Dow Jones industrial average end up 174.02 points, at 10,769.32.
The Senate approved the final bill by 90 to 8 on Nov. 4 and the House followed suit by a vote of 362 to 57. Congress had previously made almost a dozen unsuccessful attempts over the last 25 years to revise the statutes, which had increasingly come to be viewed as anachronisms.
"The world changes, and Congress and the laws have to change with it," said Senator Phil Gramm of Texas, chairman of the Banking Committee and one of the bill's prime sponsors.
Opponents said it would have the opposite effect, creating behemoths that will raise fees, violate customers' privacy by sharing and selling their personal data, and put the stability of the financial system at risk.
The privacy issue was a key focus in the long and often heated negotiations that produced a compromise bill, and President Clinton made clear he still wanted to see more done to safeguard consumers' personal financial information.
Clinton's support for the legislation comes despite warnings from critics and consumer activists that it could lead to price-gouging of consumers and the erosion of their privacy by newly formed financial conglomerates that are too big and powerful.
"The bill is anti-consumer and anti-community," advocate Ralph Nader declared. "It will mean higher prices and fewer choices for low-, moderate- and middle-income families across the nation."