Chauncey Gardner
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2024
- Messages
- 397
Your shamanistic declarations are not compelling.Abiogenesis is that mystery scientists will never be able to explain or reproduce without God's involvement.
Your shamanistic declarations are not compelling.Abiogenesis is that mystery scientists will never be able to explain or reproduce without God's involvement.
LOL, if I started over I would still buy Apple computers again, and you would still choose to be a brainless twittyNo. You confused yourself again. Pay attention this time:
I can prove that life DID form. I cannot show exactly how it formed.
I will give you a chance to start over, once the hyperactive episode passes.
That's nice. Good luck with your internet rich guy character.LOL, if I started over I would still buy Apple computers again, and you would still choose to be a brainless twitty
Market Summary > Apple Inc
188.52 USD+188.40 (171,277.27%)all time
Tallyho
Thanks, I retired at 55 while you will work until you are 90 if you are lucky, and never create anything much less a life like I have created twoThat's nice. Good luck with your internet rich guy character.
Sure you did.Thanks, I retired at 55 while you will work until you are 90 if you are lucky
I sure did.Sure you did.
Sure.
In a universe where people are paid to be ignorant jerks on the internet, maybe.
That's nice. If we want to hear your hilarious claims, we will look you up on Grinder.I sure did.
This is about a dumb English tea bag pretending to be a great scientist because CERN passed on his credentials. You may now explain how you created life spontaneously in the lab.That's nice. If we want to hear your hilarious claims, we will look you up on Grinder.
This is a thread about a scientific topic.
Yes. For those who choose the pleasures of sin over righteousness an invisible God is irrational.An eternal, omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent god that is also invisible, inaudible, intangible and odorless is far more speculative and irrational.
He did not. He suggested everything is possible and if they did, they would be super intelligent.Dawkins admitted he believes some intelligent being or beings may have seeded life on earth in the beginning, but he adamantly refuses to acknowledge the possibility of the existence of the God of the Bible. That makes him a fool.
Glad that you admit that Dawkins has no facts just assumptionsHe did not. He suggested everything is possible and if they did, they would be super intelligent.
His assumption there is no god is because there is no evidence, the same for aliens. Possibilities don't prove fact.
You've enjoyed the pleasures of sin with eight kids. Procreation every time? I don't think so.Yes. For those who choose the pleasures of sin over righteousness an invisible God is irrational.
He claimed aliens may have seeded life on earth and he cannot see aliens, so your argument suggesting the unseen is not real or not scientific falls completely apart.He did not. He suggested everything is possible and if they did, they would be super intelligent.
His assumption there is no god is because there is no evidence, the same for aliens. Possibilities don't prove fact.
In marriage between one husband and one wife, the bed is undefiled.You've enjoyed the pleasures of sin with eight kids. Procreation every time? I don't think so.