mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 27,701
Yes, the Democrat indictment lays out the debatable Democrat allegations.debatable? the indictment clearly lays out the reasons in many pages of documented findings, *****.
Yes, the Democrat indictment lays out the debatable Democrat allegations.debatable? the indictment clearly lays out the reasons in many pages of documented findings, *****.
Mis-matched signatures is not an issue Democrats can claim is not serious since it is allegedly subjective. Signature verification laws would be meaningless if signatures could not be acceptably judged to match or fail to match. Mis-matched signatures are a problem Democrats cannot simply wave away with the magic leftist lying narrative.again, *****, signature matching is a subjective opinion.
when you say "clearly" had mismatched signatures, prove it.
oh you can't. lol
you just accept anything from you rmoron sources as being "fact" if it agrees with your bigotry. lol
sorry, burden of proof is on you, and you morons failed. again. lol
don't you ever get tired of being a ***** and failing completely? apparently not
Mis-matched signatures is not an issue Democrats can claim is not serious since it is allegedly subjective. Signature verification laws would be meaningless if signatures could not be acceptably judged to match or fail to match. Mis-matched signatures are a problem Democrats cannot simply wave away with the magic leftist lying narrative.
Yes, the Democrat indictment lays out the debatable Democrat allegations.
Your efforts to whitewash the mis-matching signature fiasco are futile.it not "allegedly" subjective, it is subjective. that's a fact. no one's signature ever matches exactly time after time, so its always a subjective analysis if it "matches" "closely enough" or not. duh.
good thing dems didn't have to "wave it" away, the courts did
Who is the real anti-American traitor, Trump or (pick any prominent Socialist Democrat Party fascist)?whcih allegaations areebatable
Futile? Judge ruled against themYour efforts to whitewash the mis-matching signature fiasco are futile.
TrumpWho is the real anti-American traitor, Trump or (pick any prominent Socialist Democrat Party fascist)?
You claim a judge ruled on the evidence of ballots with mis-matched signatures so now you have an obligation to try to prove that dishonest claim. Who was the judge and what can you show detailing the judge's ruling?Futile? Judge ruled against them
You morons were futile lol
Sez the bent Marxist ideologue.Trump
I claim thr judge ruled that you morons failed to make your caseYou claim a judge ruled on the evidence of ballots with mis-matched signatures so now you have an obligation to try to prove that dishonest claim. Who was the judge and what can you show detailing the judge's ruling?
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter A. Thompson said Lake failed to prove her claim that Maricopa County did not verify signatures on mail ballots as required by law.You claim a judge ruled on the evidence of ballots with mis-matched signatures so now you have an obligation to try to prove that dishonest claim. Who was the judge and what can you show detailing the judge's ruling?
I am a Marxist? LolSez the bent Marxist ideologue.
Not good enough. What judge ruled on the hundreds of thousands of ballots with mis-matched signatures illegally counted in the AZ 2020 election? Name the case and provide a transcript or stop telling fibs.I claim thr judge ruled that you morons failed to make your case
Since that is what happened duh
Lake did not contest whether voters' signatures on ballot envelopes matched those in their voting records.You claim a judge ruled on the evidence of ballots with mis-matched signatures so now you have an obligation to try to prove that dishonest claim. Who was the judge and what can you show detailing the judge's ruling?