Obama Digs for Dirt!!

Werbung:
again, *****, signature matching is a subjective opinion.
when you say "clearly" had mismatched signatures, prove it.
oh you can't. lol
you just accept anything from you rmoron sources as being "fact" if it agrees with your bigotry. lol

sorry, burden of proof is on you, and you morons failed. again. lol

don't you ever get tired of being a ***** and failing completely? apparently not
Mis-matched signatures is not an issue Democrats can claim is not serious since it is allegedly subjective. Signature verification laws would be meaningless if signatures could not be acceptably judged to match or fail to match. Mis-matched signatures are a problem Democrats cannot simply wave away with the magic leftist lying narrative.
 
Mis-matched signatures is not an issue Democrats can claim is not serious since it is allegedly subjective. Signature verification laws would be meaningless if signatures could not be acceptably judged to match or fail to match. Mis-matched signatures are a problem Democrats cannot simply wave away with the magic leftist lying narrative.

it not "allegedly" subjective, it is subjective. that's a fact. no one's signature ever matches exactly time after time, so its always a subjective analysis if it "matches" "closely enough" or not. duh.

good thing dems didn't have to "wave it" away, the courts did :)
 
it not "allegedly" subjective, it is subjective. that's a fact. no one's signature ever matches exactly time after time, so its always a subjective analysis if it "matches" "closely enough" or not. duh.

good thing dems didn't have to "wave it" away, the courts did :)
Your efforts to whitewash the mis-matching signature fiasco are futile.
 
Futile? Judge ruled against them
You morons were futile lol
You claim a judge ruled on the evidence of ballots with mis-matched signatures so now you have an obligation to try to prove that dishonest claim. Who was the judge and what can you show detailing the judge's ruling?
 
You claim a judge ruled on the evidence of ballots with mis-matched signatures so now you have an obligation to try to prove that dishonest claim. Who was the judge and what can you show detailing the judge's ruling?
I claim thr judge ruled that you morons failed to make your case
Since that is what happened duh
 
You claim a judge ruled on the evidence of ballots with mis-matched signatures so now you have an obligation to try to prove that dishonest claim. Who was the judge and what can you show detailing the judge's ruling?
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter A. Thompson said Lake failed to prove her claim that Maricopa County did not verify signatures on mail ballots as required by law.
 
I claim thr judge ruled that you morons failed to make your case
Since that is what happened duh
Not good enough. What judge ruled on the hundreds of thousands of ballots with mis-matched signatures illegally counted in the AZ 2020 election? Name the case and provide a transcript or stop telling fibs.
 
Werbung:
You claim a judge ruled on the evidence of ballots with mis-matched signatures so now you have an obligation to try to prove that dishonest claim. Who was the judge and what can you show detailing the judge's ruling?
Lake did not contest whether voters' signatures on ballot envelopes matched those in their voting records.

E
Her lawyers knew your claim was bogus and didn't even raise it lol
 
Back
Top