Obama Digs for Dirt!!

[mark francis]

I take great please in slandering every god because know none exists. It's idiots like who feel you're being surveiled forever.
You've been conned by the oldest known trick to mankind and a man your age still worshipping a fucking stupid god.
There's is no hope for USA when the majority of people still believe that shit.

So you delight in slandering Biden's god? Knock yourself out.

 

[mark francis]

Have you evidence that they can be corrupted after being correlated for an election? I'll say you dont and it's your hate showing again.


When did a Democrat fight like hell to stop them being audited? I know they conducted themselves lawfully according to the electoral Act.

That's the proof you need to believe. But no, you're in a crusade by god to rid the country of those evil atheist democrats.
Cry you bastard cry.

How could the evidence of voting corruption be gathered when corrupt officials inexplicably refused to allow the machines to be examined by non-biased experts immediately after the election? The election officials suspected of committing fraud prove themselves worthy of suspicion by refusing to allow voting machines to be cleared of fraud by examination.

 

[mark francis]

Maricopa run bybrepublicans ***** lol

Sye lost in court because her evidence wasn't credible duh

No republican, democrat, or court official has adequately explained how hundreds of thousands of AZ ballots with mis-matching signatures ended up being counted in the 2020 election.

 

[mark francis]

Let's get the names of the whistle blowers and see if their evidence holds up in Court.
I'm saying there was none and the story was written by a disgruntled republican. The gateway pundit?
That's a communist rag.

The evidence of hundreds of thousands of ballots with mis-matched signatures counted in AZ in 2020 does not need a court to explain what happened but some government official needs to go on record with a plausible explanation for how that happened. BTW, this serious evidence of error in AZ has not been refuted by any judge.

 

[mark francis]

Authoritarian communists love projection, it would seem.

 

[pjmret]

No republican, democrat, or court official has adequately explained how hundreds of thousands of AZ ballots with mis-matching signatures ended up being counted in the 2020 election.

Courts didn't accept the claim as credible
Mismatched is a subjective claim
You morons believe every claim if it fits your bigotry

 

[pjmret]

View attachment 6214

You support criminals. Pathetic

 

[pjmret]

The evidence of hundreds of thousands of ballots with mis-matched signatures counted in AZ in 2020 does not need a court to explain what happened but some government official needs to go on record with a plausible explanation for how that happened. BTW, this serious evidence of error in AZ has not been refuted by any judge.

It's a subjective claim
You morons need to prove its correct and you didn't
Burden of proof on you and you failed

 

[NEDFLANDERS]

Borris is a complete contradiction. Belief there's no god is still Belief.

 

[NEDFLANDERS]

He's probably never been able to find credible proof there's no god. But the real question is, why does it matter to him?

Why does he feel threatened by an all powerful, all knowing, one god? A one god is axiomaticaly an atheist and thusly the only true atheist. But does it lead by example?

What would be the meaning of naming it's only son after the faggot god of the faggot people that kill him and publish his book with eunuch slave labor if it were a jealous god? Ji: zero year latin "mary/spouse" + "zeus" faggot god of the faggots that kill him. How does a self respecting jealous and: all powerful, all knowing, one god; just accidently name their only son after the faggot god of the faggot people that kill him? Wooopsy?

Now i heard the story about a man named sue but this is being a little rough, doncha think? doncha? Where's the love? How does an all powerful jealous one god just accidently do that? Or for that matter, name him for anything that could ever be construed that way so plausibly?

Looks like a big goddamned plot hole, imho.

Now don't go thinking this is an argument there's no god. A fkup this massive had to have had some kind of an unearthly power involved just to achieve it.

Sue never had it so good and boris is just a liar that convincingly lies to themselves.

 

[mark francis]

Courts didn't accept the claim as credible
Mismatched is a subjective claim
You morons believe every claim if it fits your bigotry

Courts never even looked at the evidence of hundreds of thousands of mis-matched signatures, much less ruled on the evidence.

 

[mark francis]

You support criminals. Pathetic

I do not support criminals who illegally lied and spied on Trump for the Democrat party

 

[mark francis]

It's a subjective claim
You morons need to prove its correct and you didn't
Burden of proof on you and you failed

Signature verification is serious, not something frivolous. Democrats have failed to prove the hundreds of thousands of ballots with mis-matched signatures were valid.

 

[pjmret]

Courts never even looked at the evidence of hundreds of thousands of mis-matched signatures, much less ruled on the evidence.

how do you know what they looked at *****? were you there?

 

[pjmret]

Signature verification is serious, not something frivolous. Democrats have failed to prove the hundreds of thousands of ballots with mis-matched signatures were valid.

who said it was frivolous *****?