Obama Digs for Dirt!!

Werbung:
The judge tossed her claims but was reprimanded by a higher court for errors. Nevertheless, the Lake case covered the 2022 election, not the 2020 election.
And then the case was retried and she lost without even bringing up her claim because she knew it was bogus
 
Nope they are not
They don't have to pander to morons who are unhappy

Life doesn't work the way you want it
Of course Democrats feel no obligation to be honest and open because they cannot be honest and open while simultaneously hiding the most massive voting fraud ever.
 
Of course not but until it does, which it won't because there was no fraud, you won't be happy. Suck eggs.
If this was all witnessed even by republican workers, where is that voice that needs to speak up? Why hasn't it been presented to a court? You're all piss and wind.
Democrats: Voting fraud is not fraud if done for the benefit of the Democrat Party.
Of course not, BECAUSE THERE WAS NONE.
There was no serious error and your the only idiot who cant see it.
If banks treated signature verifications like Democrats do in elections, then banks would be wasting time worrying about verifying signatures for any banking transactions of any kind.
 
Last edited:
Of course Democrats feel no obligation to be honest and open because they cannot be honest and open while simultaneously hiding the most massive voting fraud ever.
The fraud certified by... red states like Arizona lol
You are a *****
 
Democrats: Voting fraud is not fraud if done for the benefit of the Democrat Party.
Is that the same fraud which benefitted repigs when Trump was elected?
If banks treated signature verifications like Democrats do in elections, then banks would be wasting time worrying about verifying signatures for any banking transactions of any kind.
Don't talk shit.
You'll go to your grave with a hatred that will outlast religion. Soon I hope.
 
Burden of proof is on you
We do make light of your 100 percent failure
The fact of hundreds of thousands of mismatched signatures on ballots having been illegally accepted as legitimate has already been proven. It is now up to Democrats to prove the evidence does not show fraud.
 
The fact of hundreds of thousands of mismatched signatures on ballots having been illegally accepted as legitimate has already been proven. It is now up to Democrats to prove the evidence does not show fraud.
Who judged them to be mismatched? Not those republican electoral workers? Why would they do that mark?
To deliberately lose the election?

I suggest you proof read what you write. That's ridiculous.
 
Werbung:
The fact of hundreds of thousands of mismatched signatures on ballots having been illegally accepted as legitimate has already been proven. It is now up to Democrats to prove the evidence does not show fraud.
You morons don't know the difference between a fact and opinion lol
Then again you are morons
 
Back
Top