Do you agree Deport the Hamas supporters

[the annoying thing]

Where would you deport the American Hamas supporters too?

Think, please

You can not deport American citizens who believe different but you can charge them with supporting terrorist if they support them with money . We shouldn't offer Gaza one dime.

 

[mark francis]

The money the US returned to Iran was Iranian money seized by the US government that was intended to pay for weapons.

Wrong. The SCOTUS ruled those funds were to be distributed among US victims of Iranian terrorists, not to the terrorists who illegally deposed the Shah whose money it was to begin with.

https://www.cnn.com/2016/04/20/politics/supreme-court-rules-in-favor-of-terror-victims/index.html

 

[Tripoli]

Wrong. The SCOTUS ruled those funds were to be distributed among US victims of Iranian terrorists, not to the terrorists who illegally deposed the Shah whose money it was to begin with.

https://www.cnn.com/2016/04/20/politics/supreme-court-rules-in-favor-of-terror-victims/index.html

Mark, you are very confused

Why did Biden release money to Iran?


The now infamous $6 billion was Iran's oil revenue blocked in South Korea. The US government allowed it to be released as part of a deal in September that brought back five Iranian-Americans who were held hostage in Iran. That deal raised many questions from the onset.

 

[mark francis]

Mark, you are very confused
Why did Biden release money to Iran?

Biden was working a different deal with thugs in Iran, likely turning loose billions of dollars under some kind of under the table quid pro quo arrangement that would boost his personal bank account by millions of dollars. Obama laid his hands on money that had been frozen for more than 30 years, releasing it to the wrong people just weeks before the SCOTUS ruled the money belonged to Americans, not thieving murdering terrorist thugs that never o3wned the money in the first place.

 

[Tripoli]

Biden was working a different deal with thugs in Iran, likely turning loose billions of dollars under some kind of under the table quid pro quo arrangement that would boost his personal bank account by millions of dollars. Obama laid his hands on money that had been frozen for more than 30 years, releasing it to the wrong people just weeks before the SCOTUS ruled the money belonged to Americans, not thieving murdering terrorist thugs that never o3wned the money in the first place.

Actually you are confused.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

The money in question was Iranian money sent by the Shah to buy weapons, and interest on said funds. It was not American money, it was not foreign aid, it was Iranian money accumulating interest at a rate which was likely to rise. The US is obligated to return it, and to pay interest on it as long as they hold it based on valid contracts approved by the US government.

 

[the annoying thing]

matters not to me any time you release money to IRAN

The money in question was Iranian money sent by the Shah to buy weapons, and interest on said funds. It was not American money, it was not foreign aid, it was Iranian money accumulating interest at a rate which was likely to rise. The US is obligated to return it, and to pay interest on it as long as they hold it based on valid contracts approved by the US government.

The money in question was Iranian money sent by the Shah to buy weapons, and interest on said funds. It was not American money, it was not foreign aid, it was Iranian money accumulating interest at a rate which was likely to rise. The US is obligated to return it, and to pay interest on it as long as they hold it based on valid contracts approved by the US government.

Matters not who money it was any time you release money or asserts to a terrorist nation its wrong , people will die and suffer . Every effort to bring Iran to its knees it need to stop them ,

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

It matters to world banks, The US cannot seize money and refuse to return it. You know don't know diddly about world finance.

 

[the annoying thing]

It matters to world banks, The US cannot seize money and refuse to return it. You know don't know diddly about world finance.

O yes making the banking system happy is much more important than punishing terrorists. Who have killed thousand .

 

[mark francis]

The money in question was Iranian money sent by the Shah to buy weapons, and interest on said funds. It was not American money, it was not foreign aid, it was Iranian money accumulating interest at a rate which was likely to rise. The US is obligated to return it, and to pay interest on it as long as they hold it based on valid contracts approved by the US government.

If the money belonged to the Shah then why did Obama give it to the Shah's enemies? Also, if the money was held up in court for more than 30 years what gave Obama the right to come along and give the money to the terrorists without the court's approval or recommendation?

 

[mark francis]

It matters to world banks, The US cannot seize money and refuse to return it. You know don't know diddly about world finance.

The world bank did not agree for Obama to take the former Shah's money and give it to the Shah's enemies while the case was still being debated by the SCOTUS.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

If the money belonged to the Shah then why did Obama give it to the Shah's enemies? Also, if the money was held up in court for more than 30 years what gave Obama the right to come along and give the money to the terrorists without the court's approval or recommendation?

It did NOT belong to the Shah, it belongs to the country of Iran. Obama was president, and that gave him the right. Presidents negotiate treaties. One president (Carter) froze the money. Obama had the authority, but he did not return the money, that is why we are still discussing it: all the money has not been returned.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

American citizens have the right to hold any opinions they wish to, and they also have the right to speak freely, guaranteed by the First Amendment. Citizens cannot be deported for expressing themselves.

 

[the annoying thing]

American citizens have the right to hold any opinions they wish to, and they also have the right to speak freely, guaranteed by the First Amendment. Citizens cannot be deported for expressing themselves.

Im not talking about citizens.

 

[mark francis]

The money in question was Iranian money sent by the Shah to buy weapons, and interest on said funds. It was not American money, it was not foreign aid, it was Iranian money accumulating interest at a rate which was likely to rise. The US is obligated to return it, and to pay interest on it as long as they hold it based on valid contracts approved by the US government.

If the money belonged to free Iranians under the Shah then why did bozo take it upon himself to give the money belonging to the Shah and the Iranian people to the murderous thugs who wickedly overthrew the Shah and brutally subjected the Iranian people? Furthermore, if the money was being held for the Shah for forty years while courts deliberated the disposition of the money why did bozo take it upon himself just weeks before the SCOTUS ruled to give the money to terrorists that the SCOTUS ruled just weeks afterward did not belong to the terrorists?