California Proposition 8

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: California Proposition 8 Continued

Being vegans we didn't have most of the traditional things. Mock mock turtle soup was new for us, it comes from Peter Sinclair's recipe in Alex's Restaurant. No turtles were mocked in the making of this soup. Real turtle soup was made from green turtles until they disappeared from over hunting, then mock turtle soup was made from some of the more disgusting parts of calves and sheep. Mock mock turtle soupl is vegan, nothing of animal origin is used.

Many pumpkin pies have milk, eggs, sugar, whip cream, or other animal products in them, vegan pumpkin does not.

Tofurkey is a tofu roast with stuffing inside and comes with gravy.

AHHHH...our turtle soup comes from those nasty 'alligator type snapping turtles' that are horribly prevalent in our local ponds {vicious hateful nasty things}...but they sure do fry up nice and make some fantastic full meat soup!
 
Werbung:
Re: California Proposition 8 Continued

Oh, now you've gone and done IT...you've interrupted her conversation with herself :confused:
And she's dredging up the same-ole-same-ole but with a new twist...she's discussing this same repetitive B.S. on another site and bringing her acknowledgements back here to share like an award/banner of intelligence/certificate of knowledge...
It's sounding more like a Porky (Limbaugh) PLUS tactic, where....ol' Porky will verbally-quote (with his own spin) someone, then mix-in a recorded-quote, to magically-support whatever crap he's attempting to sell.

Sihouette has taken such a tactic on-step-farther, by generating both-quotes, without those inconvenient references/links/actual-quotes.....magically-supporting whatever crap Sihouette's attempting to sell.

:rolleyes:

"conservatives" really do need to spend a lil'-less-time in that parallel-universe, only they have managed to discover.​
 
Re: California Proposition 8 Continued

;)

I know! It was a bit of a riot watching her pat herself on the back for being at the least a homophobe and at worst just a good old fashion bigot. :D
Traditional ("conservative") values....aren't they grand??!!!

:rolleyes:
 
Re: California Proposition 8 Continued

The tag-team is back! Hey guys and gals and whatever, Welcome back!

Now, when you get done foaming at the mouth, let's revisit this quote from the 2001 article from Pfaus et al. and discuss the implications.

"Experience early in life that has a latent effect on
subsequent sexual behavior has been termed sexual
imprinting (Bateson, 1978a,b). As with other forms of
imprinting (see Lorenz, 1970), the exact nature of associations
and reinforcement contingencies involved
in this type of learning are not well understood. However,
it has been argued that imprinting follows contingency
rules similar to those important for classical
conditioning (Hollis, ten Cate, and Bateson, 1991)." http://www-psychology.concordia.ca/fac/pfaus/Pf

Do you conclude that sexual preference is learned or innate given the AI industry's practices of sexual imprinting stud animals onto inanimate objects and same-gender mounts, and the findings in this article? If not, why not exactly?

Do you believe that we are a trainable species? No? In other words that much of the studies and conclusions in the field of comparative psychology are false?

http://www-psychology.concordia.ca/fac/pfaus/Pfaus-Kippin-Centeno(2001).pdf can be typed directly into your address bar to get the link to work. For some reason this information gets screwed up when the link feature is used.

It's funny that you guys brought up vegetarianism. Just last night we had a wild mushroom/lentil loaf with mashed potatoes. It was excellent. We eat vegan or vegetarian meals about 4 nights out of 7 just because it's healthier and easier on the karma. I've been a total vegetarian at times in my life. Not sure exactly what that has to do with the findings of an industry that caters to people eating meat. Logically you cannot debunk a conclusion of science and practice by personal superstitions and beliefs?
 
Re: California Proposition 8 Continued

In other words, just because you abhor eating meat, doesn't mean that the industry that produces it for people that do has reached false conclusions in imprinting their AI stud animals. The Grand Canyon pales in comparison to the leap that must be made there in your deducing process.

Meanwhile I thought it might be fun to visit some of the terminology that the gay culture uses to refer to its various members and their peculiar kink.

"[BRI, Bring out, "To aid and abet the coming-out process", "Usually refers to an `experienced' gay man initiating a sexual relationship with a younger man who has never had homosexual sex."

"[BUN, Bunker shy, "A young man afraid of being forced into homosexual sex.", "From an early nineteenth-century prison term."

"[CAT, Catamite, "Originally, since the 1500s, a young boy or man kept by an older man for sexual purposes; now, any male bottom in anal sex.", "Related terms are bronco and peg boy."

"[CD, cute Daddy, "usually used to refer to an attractive man with children."

"[CHE, Cherry Queen, "Likes to initiate virgins."

"CHI, Chicken Queen, "Prefers sex with young boys or men."

"CHICK, chickenhawk, "an older gay man who prefers chicken."

"[HIT, hit, "homo in training.", "A young gay man who may or may not be aware that he's gay."

http://www.glinn.com/news/gaygloss.htm
*********

It's an interesting list that sheds light on some of the gay culture. A must-read for anyone considering normalizing sexual deviance via marriage. Maybe they stumbled on it in NY before they voted? That might explain the defeat for their lobby right there..
 
Re: California Proposition 8 Continued

It's funny that you guys brought up vegetarianism. Just last night we had a wild mushroom/lentil loaf with mashed potatoes. It was excellent. We eat vegan or vegetarian meals about 4 nights out of 7 just because it's healthier and easier on the karma. I've been a total vegetarian at times in my life.
:cool:

So why do you keep returning to 'carnivore' in your eating habits?
 
Re: California Proposition 8 Continued

So why do you keep returning to 'carnivore' in your eating habits?~ASPCA
Well you could start another thread about that if you want and I'll answer you there. This one is about homosexuals and other deviants trying to get legally married.
 
Just thought I'd bump this since its sister thread is here and it might be hard to find for reference. Took me a little while for sure.
 
Re: California Proposition 8 Continued

Well you could start another thread about that if you want and I'll answer you there. This one is about homosexuals and other deviants trying to get legally married.

You mean that you THINK that you're going to find anyone to respond to this regurgitated topic that you are fixated about...hmmm:eek:

Well, whatever turns you ON!!! ;)






 
Re: California Proposition 8 Continued

We've been through all of Siho's nonsense several times. If teaching sexual orientation was so simple then there would be no gays or pedophiles and there would be some scientific proof of the efficacy of this education process. There isn't any proof.

And sexually abusing animals for money and having a hardon for gay people because of a failed love affair are hardly the basis for drawing conclusions about human sexuality.

Dragging up old definitions is also silly, why not drag up some about phrenology or phlogiston while you're at it? You have no credibility, Siho, and you admitted that your own sister (who DOES have an education) also disagrees with you. Bleat like a sheep if you wish, but we all know the fury of a woman scorned and you have been scorned by a gay man. All of this fury just shows the depth of the pain you feel and how badly you want to get revenge by causing pain to others. Shameful, sad, pitiful, disgusting, but more than anything just sad, sad, sad.
 
It's bad enough that you are resurrecting a dead subject without doing it on two threads with the same name simultaneously.
 
Re: California Proposition 8 Continued

We've been through all of Siho's nonsense several times. If teaching sexual orientation was so simple then there would be no gays or pedophiles and there would be some scientific proof of the efficacy of this education process. There isn't any proof.

And sexually abusing animals for money and having a hardon for gay people because of a failed love affair are hardly the basis for drawing conclusions about human sexuality.
Dragging up old definitions is also silly, why not drag up some about phrenology or phlogiston while you're at it? You have no credibility, Siho, and you admitted that your own sister (who DOES have an education) also disagrees with you. Bleat like a sheep if you wish, but we all know the fury of a woman scorned and you have been scorned by a gay man. All of this fury just shows the depth of the pain you feel and how badly you want to get revenge by causing pain to others. Shameful, sad, pitiful, disgusting, but more than anything just sad, sad, sad.







 
Werbung:
I think the whole phenomenon of being gay is a little hard to understand. I think there may be some people with legitmate hormone imbalances from birth that cause them to be attracted to the same sex. But I also think there are a much wider group of people who have adopted gayness as an impressed behavior.
Yeah....right.....bring-on the "conservative"-Hustlers (to "cure" them).

:rolleyes:

Many people who I know to be gay have admitted to a sexual encounter at an impressionable age of a same-sexed, almost always older or adult perpetrator.
B.S.

:rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top