California Proposition 8

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh, you're citing the univeristy of "BS" again eh shaman? ..lol..

Hey Mare, this is on topic so I thought I'd ask you a question. If you hold your hand out flat and look at your fingers, is your ring finger longer-looking than your index, shorter, or about the same length? I promise this is on topic and I'll tell you why I'm asking after you answer.
 
Werbung:
Re: California Proposition 8 Continued

Hey Mare, this is on topic so I thought I'd ask you a question. If you hold your hand out flat and look at your fingers, is your ring finger longer-looking than your index, shorter, or about the same length? I promise this is on topic and I'll tell you why I'm asking after you answer.
 
Just because Siho wants to 'BUMP' this one up and keep 2 topics going at the same exact time {for her convenience because she can't seem to comprehend/function with the search option} now we have 2 identical topics about: sexual deviancy, beastiality, perverted adolescence and how that all can be imprinted upon young minds...:eek:

If your taking a poll...my vote is lock this one up and make her do the one and only new one...heaven forbid that she actually learns how to do the search function on HOP :p
 
OK, merger complete.

What just happened???
OH, No...now I'll be a real whiny A$$ LMAO
Could you at least sprinkle 'Fairy Dust' all over those really sick twisted old drudged up B.S. so that she can't keep cutting & pasting them all over the new posts from this point forward :confused: I mean, once around that pervert sludge was enough...if you catch my drift ;)






 
OK, yeah I wasn't sure if the old thread was getting too big. It was approaching 100 pages. Some websites have restrictions so..

How many pages can a thread go to on this site? Just curious.

So Mare, I'll ask again, when you place your hands down flat, is your index finger longer than your ring or the other way around? Remember, this is subject-oriented so I'll reveal why when you answer, if you answer..
 
I watched Rachel Maddow last night, who I usually enjoy for her restraint on her bias on various issues and just sticking to good old journalism. Last night though I was cringing for her to stop as she BLEW it hugely with her guest Richard Cohen. He utterly denounced what was going on in Uganda and she had the gall to accuse him of having "blood on [his] hands"! The guy cannot control how someone interprets his book! I wonder if she's going to insist that he be tried in a court of law for aiding and abetting murder if someone in Uganda gets killed who liked his book that in no way espouses violence towards anyone? Just because information conflicts with her own preconceptions about homosexuality, doesn't necessarily mean it is wrong, or that it will lead to homosexuals dying as the author' fault??

The guy has a degree in psychotherapy but apparently never bothered to be licensed in it to open practice. And he has thousands of case-studies behind him to at least lend support to what he is trained in a university to understand. Thousands of laypeople, many with degrees and vast experience in their field write good and knowledgeable material on subjects that cause the "licensed" community to sit up and take notice. Rachel IMHO really went overboard in taking him to task. She inserted so many words into his mouth that I actually muted the tube out of shame for her. Good point after good point she waved aside with a rabid comment while the interviewee maintained his composure and grace throughout. I thought at one point I was watching Glenn Beck's show. Hannity has shown more restraint. aggh..

He has a right to discuss whether or not he believes homosexuality can be un-imprinted. Good luck to him because I've seen in animals anyway that it is very difficult, but perhaps not impossible? [in other words I still have an open mind]. He agreed with her that praying and trying to find the right woman just wouldn't cut the program because the underlying causes of homosexuality are way too complex for these simplistic solutions. She offered him no quarter. It was clear that her isms were winning out against her better judgement of remaining objective.

When the interview was done, I had my jaw on the floor and am convinced that if the entire evolving field of psychology joined together after further studies to announce that Cohen was onto something, she would've had them all burned at the stake for heresy. The gay culture is now looking more like a cult than whatever it is they're trying to pass themselves off as. She was virtually cultish. I look forward for her return to her usual restrained stance on other issues. Obviously those having to do with differing findings and opinions on the origins of homosexuality have touched a very deep and raw nerve in her.. She had a clear and vested interest in keeping those stones unturned.
 
Iran has the ticket, Siho, first they beat the fwcking queer with a whip 500 times and then they cut off their head. So far this has ended the problem and they have not a single case of recidivism.

Being scorned by a gay guy must be incredibly painful for a hetero/bestiality person such as yourself, have you gotten counseling to deal with the trauma? I think that most counselors would suggest that a vendetta against all gay people is not the most beneficial way to deal with your hurts.
 
Iran has the ticket, Siho, first they beat the fwcking queer with a whip 500 times and then they cut off their head. So far this has ended the problem and they have not a single case of recidivism.

Being scorned by a gay guy must be incredibly painful for a hetero/bestiality person such as yourself, have you gotten counseling to deal with the trauma? I think that most counselors would suggest that a vendetta against all gay people is not the most beneficial way to deal with your hurts.

Yep...that would seem like a quick cure...but we both know that it only drives it underground further.;)

Maybe they could try the Sara Palin Church method; "Pray Away the GAY"...LOL Maybe, just maybe they'll have better luck with that method then they did with the abstinence method for premarital SEX :rolleyes:
 
Being scorned by a gay guy
He was bisexual who cared about me quite a lot. We never had sex because neither of us found that sex was a necessary part of the relationship. He was like a brother to me and he died of AIDS. Are you saying his dying was some sort of a scorning? Find the quote where I said I was scorned by him? Can you find it?

You didn't answer the question about your fingers Mare. Care to?

On to the Maddow agenda. People getting killed for being homosexual is something all of us agree is wrong. People getting flogged for being deviants is also wrong. Mr. Cohen of Rachel's interview also heartily agreed on those matters and urged compassion and understanding. I realize it serves "the cause" better if it looks like every single person with an opposing view on gay marriage looks like a homocidal homophobe which is why I and others are setting the record straight. We can have a differing point of view without being accused of hate or murder. There is plenty of hate and misleading talk on this thread but it ain't on this side of the table..
 
There is plenty of hate and misleading talk on this thread but it ain't on this side of the table..

Your basic thesis is hateful and misleading. What you do to animals is just disgusting and perverted--of course it's okay because you do it for money.
 
Your basic thesis is hateful and misleading. What you do to animals is just disgusting and perverted--of course it's okay because you do it for money.
Meanwhile I thought it might be fun to visit some of the terminology that the gay culture uses to refer to its various members and their peculiar kink.
Quote:
"[BRI, Bring out, "To aid and abet the coming-out process", "Usually refers to an `experienced' gay man initiating a sexual relationship with a younger man who has never had homosexual sex."

"[BUN, Bunker shy, "A young man afraid of being forced into homosexual sex.", "From an early nineteenth-century prison term."

"[CAT, Catamite, "Originally, since the 1500s, a young boy or man kept by an older man for sexual purposes; now, any male bottom in anal sex.", "Related terms are bronco and peg boy."

"[CD, cute Daddy, "usually used to refer to an attractive man with children."

"[CHE, Cherry Queen, "Likes to initiate virgins."

"CHI, Chicken Queen, "Prefers sex with young boys or men."

"CHICK, chickenhawk, "an older gay man who prefers chicken."

"[HIT, hit, "homo in training.", "A young gay man who may or may not be aware that he's gay."

http://www.glinn.com/news/gaygloss.htm
It's an interesting list that sheds light on some of the gay culture. A must-read for anyone considering normalizing sexual deviance via marriage. Maybe they stumbled on it in NY before they voted? That might explain the defeat for their lobby right there..

AGREED MARE; if I was of the notion/desire to subject myself to a porn sight/XXX rated community forum then that's where I would be Siho...but this isn't the place and your constant dragging your twisted/deviant topic back onto this site for your viewing pleasure is just SICK...REALLY, REALLY SICK :mad:
 
Werbung:
The gay culture is now looking more like a cult than whatever it is they're trying to pass themselves off as.

Human beings, perhaps? That is, human beings with nothing fundamentally wrong with them? Do you think the possibility exists that that is what they might be trying to 'pass themselves off as'?


Some of them, anyway. Others may not consider themselves entirely human, but that is a topic for another thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top