Blatant voting fraud: Biden defies the SCOTUS in order to buy votes with US tax dollars

[mark francis]

Yet the SC admitted he did nothing wrong?
Let's see if you believe them when the SC say Trump is guilty.

I am not aware of any SCOTUS ruling addressing Obama's unilateral decision to resolve the issue of the Shah's frozen assets without waiting for the SCOTUS ruling to come down.

 

[pjmret]

Again, SCOTUS did not rule on Obama's mistake, they ruled on the frozen assets that formerly belonged to the Shah.

So Obama did not defy the law and you lied again

 

[pjmret]

I am not aware of any SCOTUS ruling addressing Obama's unilateral decision to resolve the issue of the Shah's frozen assets without waiting for the SCOTUS ruling to come down.

So Obama was lawful and your whin8ng about scotus is stupid

 

[mark francis]

shah did not own those assets. it belonged to the Iranian people. but i am sure you will continue this baseless claim again and again.

Obama did not give the money to the Iranian people but to the crooks who unjustly overthrew the Shah and set up a base for conducting terror missions worldwide. That money was never supposed to go to the terrorists and even if there had been some justification earlier for giving the money to the terrorists, after years of mass murder terrorism the Iranian thugs lost all claims to the money, whether legitimate or not.

 

[Randomguy]

I am not aware of any SCOTUS ruling addressing Obama's unilateral decision to resolve the issue of the Shah's frozen assets without waiting for the SCOTUS ruling to come down.

those were not shah's assets. those belonged to iranian people.

 

[Randomguy]

Obama did not give the money to the Iranian people but to the crooks who unjustly overthrew the Shah and set up a base for conducting terror missions worldwide. That money was never supposed to go to the terrorists and even if there had been some justification earlier for giving the money to the terrorists, after years of mass murder terrorism the Iranian thugs lost all claims to the money, whether legitimate or not.

the UN recognizes the gov of iran, your opinion notwithstanding.

maybe you should think about the perverts who are in love with the NK dictator.

 

[pjmret]

Obama did not give the money to the Iranian people but to the crooks who unjustly overthrew the Shah and set up a base for conducting terror missions worldwide. That money was never supposed to go to the terrorists and even if there had been some justification earlier for giving the money to the terrorists, after years of mass murder terrorism the Iranian thugs lost all claims to the money, whether legitimate or not.

Unjustly overthrew a dictator? Lol

The Pahlavi dynasty—Reza Shah Pahlavi and his son Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi—has sometimes been described as a "royal dictatorship", or "one man rule", and employed secret police, torture, and executions to stifle political dissent.

You condone genocide and torture

No wonder so many people dislike Christians

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

It is not up to some wacko fundie hicktown loser to decide who Iran's money belongs to. There was a contract, and THAT was the deciding factor.

The money never belonged to Americans, Most of it was interest that had accrued over 40 years or more. It was NEVER taxpayer money, fool.

 

[mark francis]

those were not shah's assets. those belonged to iranian people.

The Iranian people never got the assets. Obama funded the terrorist gangsters holding the Iranian people hostage, which was a wicked thing to do no matter how the money first was frozen.

 

[mark francis]

the UN recognizes the gov of iran, your opinion notwithstanding.

maybe you should think about the perverts who are in love with the NK dictator.

Putin and NK have signed a wicked pact to work together to fight Christianity (Western Civilization) together.

 

[mark francis]

Unjustly overthrew a dictator? Lol

The Pahlavi dynasty—Reza Shah Pahlavi and his son Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi—has sometimes been described as a "royal dictatorship", or "one man rule", and employed secret police, torture, and executions to stifle political dissent.

You condone genocide and torture

No wonder so many people dislike Christians

No, I do not support the world leaders in torture and genocide. That would be Obama and the murderous genocidal Muslim thugs currently holding the innocent citizens of Iran hostage.

 

[mark francis]

It is not up to some wacko fundie hicktown loser to decide who Iran's money belongs to.

I don't have to decide anything. Lawyers from all sides took the issue of the frozen Iranian assets to court and in 2016 the SCOTUS ruled on who the money belongs to.

 

[pjmret]

No, I do not support the world leaders in torture and genocide. That would be Obama and the murderous genocidal Muslim thugs currently holding the innocent citizens of Iran hostage.

you said removing the shah was unjust.
you support torture and executions.
of course you support genocide too, so that makes sense

 

[Boris Norris]

I am not aware of any SCOTUS ruling addressing Obama's unilateral decision to resolve the issue of the Shah's frozen assets without waiting for the SCOTUS ruling to come down.

You said the SC said the money should go to victims. You didn't say USA victims or Iranian victims.
They did not legislate that and you know it. When they did make a decision, it doesn't matter. Obama can and did do it when he chose. No laws broken. Get over it.

 

[Randomguy]

The Iranian people never got the assets. Obama funded the terrorist gangsters holding the Iranian people hostage, which was a wicked thing to do no matter how the money first was frozen.

your unsubstantiated opinion notwithstanding iran is a member of un. and they got the money.