Texas_tea
Well-Known Member
Yes ... this is true. But, considering the majority of our wacko liberal friends get their "hard news" from these sources .... I believe it to be in context!see what taking Comedy Central seriously can do ?
Yes ... this is true. But, considering the majority of our wacko liberal friends get their "hard news" from these sources .... I believe it to be in context!see what taking Comedy Central seriously can do ?
Ignorant Facts are Liberal!
Now your making sense.
I would like to see a real public out-cry against the "liars" in the media. There needs to be a campaign against their "traitorous" behaviors. I don't think "free press" means deliberately lying to the American public or withholding information. What about trust, morality and integrity? They don't seem to have any.
Time for another Obama bail-out?They are paying for it. The MSM on TV has lost a lot of viewers, they have nowhere near as many viewers as they used to. Newspapers are going out of business, alternative media sources are growing. The MSM is being judged harshly right now, it just takes time.
Also funny how you don't back up viewer ship numbers ( viewers don't equal correct as fox proves) or show How Fox has had large losses as well at times...( not sure current as I don't care) Also this ignores that MSNBC also fired its most watched person...Olberman...and saw a drop after that...aka MSNBC lost viewers going away from the hardest hitting guy they had on the Right...BUt I mean just details...don't let facts get in the way of your idea.
Media coverage of Obama's Libya handling by turns blaring, muffled
One Republican lawmaker calls it "Benghazi-gate." Others say Congress was misled, while raising the possibility of a cover-up at the highest levels.
But the media reaction to and coverage of the potential scandal regarding the Obama administration's changing narrative on the consulate attack in Libya has ranged wildly, from top-of-the-broadcast to back page.