Leftist media is worse than ever

pjmret said:
You can't admit fox was wrong
Fox knew so they paid
They wouldn't have fired tucker otherwise no jury could force that legal *****
Click to expand...
Fox made mistakes and Dominion deliberately covered up the fraud they knew they were responsible for and for all present purposes Dominion seems to indicate they got away with their crime.
 
Werbung:
mark francis said:
Fox made mistakes and Dominion deliberately covered up the fraud they knew they were responsible for and for all present purposes Dominion seems to indicate they got away with their crime.
Click to expand...
If there was actual fraud with credible evidence fox wouldn't have paid
Stop making excuses for their lies
 
Boris Norris said:
The common theme is "we know".
No you don't. You're a liar.
Now post some link that confirms what you said but endure it can be verified.
Click to expand...
You call me a liar for pointing out that thousands of illegal immigrants registered to vote in the 2020 election. Why do you expose yourself as a stupid liar by foolishly falsely charging me with such preposterous allegations?

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jan/30/pennsylvania-11000-non-citizens-registered-vote/
Pennsylvania admits to 11,000 noncitizens registered to vote
+++++++++++++++++
Bombshells undercut the 'Big Lie:' 21 confirmed illegalities, irregularities from 2020 election | Just The News
+++++++++++++++++++
No Evidence? Nevada DMV Data Reveals Thousands of Non-Citizens Voted in 2020 Election (thenewamerican.com)
+++++++++++++++++++
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jan/30/texas-finds-95000-noncitizens-voter-rolls/
+++++++++++++++++++++

https://publicinterestlegal.org/press/report-5500-noncitizens-discovered-voter-rolls-virginia/
+++++++++++++++++++
https://www.lwv.org/newsroom/press-releases/federal-court-blocks-proof-citizenship-voting-requirement
+++++++++++++++++++++
https://www.capoliticalreview.com/capoliticalnewsandviews/california-allows-illegal-aliens-to-vote-so-each-potus-ballot-should-be-disqualified/
+++++++++++++++++
Washington state registered 'many' foreign nationals to vote in recent elections | Washington Examiner
++++++++++++++++++

California to auto-register drivers to vote, sparking fraud concerns (foxnews.com)
++++++++++++++++++
 
mark francis said:
You call me a liar for pointing out that thousands of illegal immigrants registered to vote in the 2020 election. Why do you expose yourself as a stupid liar by foolishly falsely charging me with such preposterous allegations?

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jan/30/pennsylvania-11000-non-citizens-registered-vote/
Pennsylvania admits to 11,000 noncitizens registered to vote
+++++++++++++++++
Bombshells undercut the 'Big Lie:' 21 confirmed illegalities, irregularities from 2020 election | Just The News
+++++++++++++++++++
No Evidence? Nevada DMV Data Reveals Thousands of Non-Citizens Voted in 2020 Election (thenewamerican.com)
+++++++++++++++++++
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jan/30/texas-finds-95000-noncitizens-voter-rolls/
+++++++++++++++++++++

https://publicinterestlegal.org/press/report-5500-noncitizens-discovered-voter-rolls-virginia/
+++++++++++++++++++
https://www.lwv.org/newsroom/press-releases/federal-court-blocks-proof-citizenship-voting-requirement
+++++++++++++++++++++
https://www.capoliticalreview.com/capoliticalnewsandviews/california-allows-illegal-aliens-to-vote-so-each-potus-ballot-should-be-disqualified/
+++++++++++++++++
Washington state registered 'many' foreign nationals to vote in recent elections | Washington Examiner
++++++++++++++++++

California to auto-register drivers to vote, sparking fraud concerns (foxnews.com)
++++++++++++++++++
Click to expand...
Which credible independent expert agrees with you? Name them lol
 
Boris Norris said:
The common theme is "we know".
No you don't. You're a liar.
Now post some link that confirms what you said but endure it can be verified.
Click to expand...
Do you know thousands of illegals did not vote in 2020? No, how could you know that since nobody looked into it? However, let me post a leftist propagandist attempt to fool rubes into believing the leftists proved no illegals or only a few illegals voted in 2020, which they never proved. Leftists did not even come close to disproving evidence of thousands of illegals voting, but in this article, they pretend they do:

PolitiFact | No evidence 449,000 noncitizens were registered to vote in California 10-2-19 (The leftists claim there is no evidence that 449,000 noncitizens voted. What they do not tell you is that there is no evidence 449,000 noncitizens did not vote or that evidence shows 448,000 noncitizens voted. In other words they prove nothing but attempt to fool people into erroneously thinking they proved none of the 449,000 illegals voted, which is a lie.)

"449,000 Californians turned down jury duty because they were not citizens… but they were registered voters." (Politifact writers do not disprove this report, which is a key report they need to disprove if they wish to disprove the illegals were not registered to vote.)

No evidence 449,000 noncitizens were registered to vote in California (An unproven claim falsely suggesting there is no evidence of thousands of noncitizens registered to vote in California. There can be no doubt that thousands of illegals have been registered to vote in California.)

A viral Facebook post that has peppered social media for at least a year was given fresh life last month when former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin shared it on her account.

"449,000 Californians turned down jury duty because they were not citizens… but they WERE registered voters," reads the text of the Oct. 2 post. "Let that sink in."

This post, which has been shared more than 57,000 times, was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.) (Facebook has been exposed for creating false narratives favorable to Democrats and shutting down truth the Democrats find unwelcome.)

After searching online and in the Nexis news archive, we couldn’t find this statistic in any news coverage. So we started reaching out to California officials. (Democrat-friendly news outlets did not publish this fact even as Facebook and leftist fact-checkers were busy denying the fact.)

Sam Mahood, a spokesperson for California Secretary of State Alex Padilla, told us he couldn’t comment on how many Californians declined jury duty on citizenship grounds — that’s not the office’s purview — but he said it’s not true that 449,000 noncitizens were registered to vote. (Hearsay evidence from an official admits thousands of people requested exemption from jury duty because they were non-citizens, even though their names and addresses were on voting rolls. However, in the unproven personal opinion of the official, he did not personally believe it was as many as 4449,000.)

Here’s what else you should know about potential jurors in California.

First, people who are summoned for jury duty don’t "turn it down," said Blaine Corren, a public affairs analyst for the Judicial Council of California. Rather, they can be excused from jury duty for various reasons, or a court can disqualify them from serving based on a number of factors including not being 18 or older, having a felony conviction on their record or for not being a citizen of the United States. (Fine, so how many potential jurors were excused from jury duty because they were not citizens even though their names were on voting rolls? Politifact writers avoid answering that question. Another question that needs an answer is why are so many thousands of names on California voting rolls to begin with?)

And more...
 
mark francis said:
Do you know thousands of illegals did not vote in 2020? No, how could you know that since nobody looked into it? However, let me post a leftist propagandist attempt to fool rubes into believing the leftists proved no illegals or only a few illegals voted in 2020, which they never proved. Leftists did not even come close to disproving evidence of thousands of illegals voting, but in this article, they pretend they do:

PolitiFact | No evidence 449,000 noncitizens were registered to vote in California 10-2-19 (The leftists claim there is no evidence that 449,000 noncitizens voted. What they do not tell you is that there is no evidence 449,000 noncitizens did not vote or that evidence shows 448,000 noncitizens voted. In other words they prove nothing but attempt to fool people into erroneously thinking they proved none of the 449,000 illegals voted, which is a lie.)

"449,000 Californians turned down jury duty because they were not citizens… but they were registered voters." (Politifact writers do not disprove this report, which is a key report they need to disprove if they wish to disprove the illegals were not registered to vote.)

No evidence 449,000 noncitizens were registered to vote in California (An unproven claim falsely suggesting there is no evidence of thousands of noncitizens registered to vote in California. There can be no doubt that thousands of illegals have been registered to vote in California.)

A viral Facebook post that has peppered social media for at least a year was given fresh life last month when former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin shared it on her account.

"449,000 Californians turned down jury duty because they were not citizens… but they WERE registered voters," reads the text of the Oct. 2 post. "Let that sink in."

This post, which has been shared more than 57,000 times, was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.) (Facebook has been exposed for creating false narratives favorable to Democrats and shutting down truth the Democrats find unwelcome.)

After searching online and in the Nexis news archive, we couldn’t find this statistic in any news coverage. So we started reaching out to California officials. (Democrat-friendly news outlets did not publish this fact even as Facebook and leftist fact-checkers were busy denying the fact.)

Sam Mahood, a spokesperson for California Secretary of State Alex Padilla, told us he couldn’t comment on how many Californians declined jury duty on citizenship grounds — that’s not the office’s purview — but he said it’s not true that 449,000 noncitizens were registered to vote. (Hearsay evidence from an official admits thousands of people requested exemption from jury duty because they were non-citizens, even though their names and addresses were on voting rolls. However, in the unproven personal opinion of the official, he did not personally believe it was as many as 4449,000.)

Here’s what else you should know about potential jurors in California.

First, people who are summoned for jury duty don’t "turn it down," said Blaine Corren, a public affairs analyst for the Judicial Council of California. Rather, they can be excused from jury duty for various reasons, or a court can disqualify them from serving based on a number of factors including not being 18 or older, having a felony conviction on their record or for not being a citizen of the United States. (Fine, so how many potential jurors were excused from jury duty because they were not citizens even though their names were on voting rolls? Politifact writers avoid answering that question. Another question that needs an answer is why are so many thousands of names on California voting rolls to begin with?)

And more...
Click to expand...
Still no proof lol
 
mark francis said:
PolitiFact | No evidence 449,000 noncitizens were registered to vote in California 10-2-19 (The leftists claim there is no evidence that 449,000 noncitizens voted. What they do not tell you is that there is no evidence 449,000 noncitizens did not vote or that evidence shows 448,000 noncitizens voted. In other words they prove nothing but attempt to fool people into erroneously thinking they proved none of the 449,000 illegals voted, which is a lie.)
Click to expand...
More:

The council collects statewide data on how many people were excused or disqualified and why — with some caveats. That information comes to the council from individual trial courts but since there’s no requirement that courts provide this data, some courts and categories may be missing in the Jury Data Reports the council produces. (In other words, Politifact admits they have no idea how many registered voters were excused from jury duty because they were not citizens.)

The data the state keeps on why someone was excused from jury duty includes financial hardship and physical or mental disabilities, but not citizenship status. The Judicial Council of California does, however, keep track of how many people were disqualified for jury duty because they’re not citizens. (Again. Politifact propagandists have no idea how may registered voters werre excused from jury duty because they were not citizens.)

We requested the council’s reports through the most recent fiscal year for which a completed report is available, which was July 2017-June 2018. Our analysis shows that, annually, around 1 million people — citizens and noncitizens — are disqualified from jury duty in California. Approximately half aren’t citizens. (Politifact did some research and got their hands on some records that show around 1 million Californians were excused from jury duty for various reaons, and approximately half were not citizens. Maybe the young writers at leftist Politifact missed a key point here. You cannot disprove that 449,000 illegals were registered to vote by posting state data that shows 500,000 potential jurors from voting rolls were disqualified for not being citizens.)

From July 2008 through June 2017, about 11.3 million people were disqualified. Of those, about 4.7 million were disqualified for not being a U.S. citizen.

Instagram posts

stated on November 8, 2023 in an Instagram post

On Nov. 7, 2023, Pennsylvania voting machines were “flipping votes,” which is evidence of “election fraud.”

By Sara Swann • November 10, 2023

In 2017-2018, 1,063,784 people overall were disqualified with 425,814 for not being citizens. But it was fiscal year 2016-17 that has a figure that comes closest to the claim in the Facebook post: Among 1,096,478 people who were disqualified for jury duty that year, 449,404 were disqualified for not being U.S. citizens.

But that doesn’t mean that those rejected juror candidates were registered to vote.

One of the primary sources courts use to summon jurors is the voter registration list, Corren said. The other is the state Department of Motor Vehicles’ list of licensed drivers and identification card holders in the area served by the court. Noncitizens, such as lawful permanent residents, can get driver’s licenses. As of 2015, undocumented immigrants in California can, too. So it follows that noncitizens — both lawful permanent residents and undocumented immigrants — would be summoned for jury duty as courts tap potential jurors from DMV data.

"These two lists are considered inclusive of a representative cross-section of the population, according to the California Code of Civil Procedure," Corren said. But, he added, courts could seek jurors from other sources like telephone directories and utility company lists.

In Nevada County, Calif., for example, 97 potential jurors were excused because they weren’t citizens, said Jason Galkin, court executive officer of the Superior Court there. Galkin said the county tapped them from a list it got from the DMV. But searching for their names on the voter registration list, he said, there were no matches.

In fiscal year 2017-2018, three Sierra County residents were dismissed from jury duty because they weren’t citizens but none of them were registered voters, said Jean-Anne Cheatham, a court assistant there.

Karen Dalton, a spokesperson for the San Diego County Superior Court, told us most courts in California use the DMV’s driver’s license database as its primary source for the jury master list and then augment that with the voter registrar's list. In California, noncitizens can get driver’s licenses so, again, it follows that noncitizens would appear for jury duty in San Diego County, among others.

The DMV has a "motor voter" program that automatically registers eligible driver’s license applicants unless they opt out. Sometimes, Corren said, people will inadvertently mark themselves down to register to vote and it’s possible that the lists courts receive from the DMV include these individuals. That information also goes to the California Secretary of State’s office to determine whether to add them to the voter rolls, according to Corren. The office then reviews the lists and cancels requests to register to vote from people who aren’t eligible, he said.

Three Republican voters recently sued Secretary of State Padilla over the "motor voter" program, claiming that the state enables voter fraud by failing to investigate voters’ citizenship status, Courthouse News Service reported on Oct. 1.

Since the DMV started automatically registering people to vote in April 2018, it acknowledged making 105,000 processing errors out of more than 2.4 million, according to a January Sacramento Bee story, and at least one noncitizen came forward to say he was improperly added to the voter rolls. But that doesn’t mean that 105,000 noncitizens cast ballots. Sam Mahood, with the secretary of state’s office, told us he doesn’t know of any recent convictions for noncitizens registering to vote.

It’s also a far cry from the Facebook post’s claim: that 449,000 noncitizens were registered voters who had also been summoned for jury duty and turned it down.

We rate this post False.


The propagandists do not disprove hundreds of thousands of Californians have been registered to vote. On the contrary they prove many hundreds of thousands of illegals have been registered to vote in California. Democrats do not care whether the illegals vote or not. They need the voting rolls stuffed with names whether illegal or not so they can manufacture fake ballots by the hundreds of thousands without drawing attention to the fact that the numbers of democrat votes in elections are far exceeding the number of Democrats registered to vote.
 
The aliens didn't vote. They would not have endangered themselves going to the polls. It's silly on its face. The Dems didn't want the GOP to get any unregistered votes either, so what passes for poll workers, -Dem flunkies of typical Dem moral turpitude, could use any name on the rolls any way they wanted. They were automatically registered by the Dems so that their names could fatten the list of registered voters to use as having voted via mail-in or as harvested or counted late in the evening like the video in GA showed. The Dem system registered them and ipso facto knew exactly who wouldn't show up at the polls and make a fuss because they wanted to vote when the list showed them as already having voted. When you're not legit, you don't go to the polls and make a scene, you don't show up at all unless you're stupid. Since there has only rarely ever been a serious forensic examination of actual ballots the truth will never be known. The Dems are low-down, dirty, crooked slime, but they're not stupid. The struggle to recount in AZ in '20 & '22 are pretty good examples of how they resisted, -successfully, long enough to give the crooked judicial system a chance to strike down any real investigation. MI was a good example of the Governor & Secretary of State stepping in closing doors thwarting the system. The Dems are better at stealing than the GOP is at wadding through the legal system putting up roadblocks and judge shopping, so outcomes will not change until that changes.
 
mark francis said:
Do you know thousands of illegals did not vote in 2020? No, how could you know that since nobody looked into it? However, let me post a leftist propagandist attempt to fool rubes into believing the leftists proved no illegals or only a few illegals voted in 2020, which they never proved. Leftists did not even come close to disproving evidence of thousands of illegals voting, but in this article, they pretend they do:

PolitiFact | No evidence 449,000 noncitizens were registered to vote in California 10-2-19 (The leftists claim there is no evidence that 449,000 noncitizens voted. What they do not tell you is that there is no evidence 449,000 noncitizens did not vote or that evidence shows 448,000 noncitizens voted. In other words they prove nothing but attempt to fool people into erroneously thinking they proved none of the 449,000 illegals voted, which is a lie.)

"449,000 Californians turned down jury duty because they were not citizens… but they were registered voters." (Politifact writers do not disprove this report, which is a key report they need to disprove if they wish to disprove the illegals were not registered to vote.)

No evidence 449,000 noncitizens were registered to vote in California (An unproven claim falsely suggesting there is no evidence of thousands of noncitizens registered to vote in California. There can be no doubt that thousands of illegals have been registered to vote in California.)

A viral Facebook post that has peppered social media for at least a year was given fresh life last month when former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin shared it on her account.

"449,000 Californians turned down jury duty because they were not citizens… but they WERE registered voters," reads the text of the Oct. 2 post. "Let that sink in."

This post, which has been shared more than 57,000 times, was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.) (Facebook has been exposed for creating false narratives favorable to Democrats and shutting down truth the Democrats find unwelcome.)

After searching online and in the Nexis news archive, we couldn’t find this statistic in any news coverage. So we started reaching out to California officials. (Democrat-friendly news outlets did not publish this fact even as Facebook and leftist fact-checkers were busy denying the fact.)

Sam Mahood, a spokesperson for California Secretary of State Alex Padilla, told us he couldn’t comment on how many Californians declined jury duty on citizenship grounds — that’s not the office’s purview — but he said it’s not true that 449,000 noncitizens were registered to vote. (Hearsay evidence from an official admits thousands of people requested exemption from jury duty because they were non-citizens, even though their names and addresses were on voting rolls. However, in the unproven personal opinion of the official, he did not personally believe it was as many as 4449,000.)

Here’s what else you should know about potential jurors in California.

First, people who are summoned for jury duty don’t "turn it down," said Blaine Corren, a public affairs analyst for the Judicial Council of California. Rather, they can be excused from jury duty for various reasons, or a court can disqualify them from serving based on a number of factors including not being 18 or older, having a felony conviction on their record or for not being a citizen of the United States. (Fine, so how many potential jurors were excused from jury duty because they were not citizens even though their names were on voting rolls? Politifact writers avoid answering that question. Another question that needs an answer is why are so many thousands of names on California voting rolls to begin with?)

And more...
Click to expand...
You've been banging on with this forever. It's going nowhere. What's your point.
 
Werbung:
mark francis said:
Exactly. Leftists cannot prove illegals were not registered to vote, cannot prove illegals did not vote, and cannot prove that only a few immigrants voted.
Click to expand...

good thing leftists don't have to prove that.
in our society, and in common sense, its those with a complaint who have to prove it happened.

good thing too or you'd be in jail as a murderer because you haven't proven you aren't one :)
 

Similar threads

Little-Acorn
As poll numbers tumble, Democrats shoot the messenger in record numbers
2
Replies
17
Views
3K
Mr. Shaman
Mr. Shaman
M
Forget Trump and Charlottesville misinterpretations, Walz has now said he has become friends with school shooters
Replies
5
Views
69
the annoying thing
T
P
Polls: Biden wins debate
2
Replies
22
Views
4K
Pandora
Pandora
K
Voters say they’re worse off after four years of Obama, so why is Romney struggling?
2
Replies
18
Views
4K
steveox
steveox
J
What Happens When The Media-Bias Loses All Effectiveness?
Replies
10
Views
2K
dogtowner
dogtowner
Back
Top