Dave
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2007
- Messages
- 364
If they only choose high profile cases, don't you think that in itself is promoting an agenda?
Point is - they have a visable and verifiable record of taking on all kinds of cases - it's indisputable. It's like when the religious right rant about the ACLU's anti-Christian actions yet they completely ignore all the pro-Christian cases they have fought. You just keep denying it becuase it doesn't fit with your bogeyman image of ACLU.
No, the point is that people are trying to say that an entire study is invalid because the don't like the way one organization is classified. Personally, I don't care how people feel about the ACLU. I didn't set out on this thread trying to prove one irrelevant point of the study. I merely wanted to bring attention to the study and get thoughts on it as a whole.