mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 26,945
I have no use for courts under influence from leftist liars and looters.Take it to court then lazy ***** lol
I have no use for courts under influence from leftist liars and looters.Take it to court then lazy ***** lol
you keep posting that as if it proves anything but how stupid you are. lolNo court disproved 2020 voting fraud in spite of stupid senseless attempts to undermine that fact by lying leftist looters and their ignorant supporters
I have no use for courts under influence from leftist liars and looters.
How can you claim courts that refused to examine voting fraud in court somehow disproved massive evidence of widespread 2020 voting fraud?you keep posting that as if it proves anything but how stupid you are. lol
but don't let me stop you from proving you are a *****!
because courts did examine it, *****.How can you claim courts that refused to examine voting fraud in court somehow disproved massive evidence of widespread 2020 voting fraud?
Not in court they didn't. Not before witnesses they didn't. Not in a trial before a jury they didn't. Judges do not investigate voting fraud so the best we can say is that judges looked it over and decided the evidence was insufficient to warrant a further review in a courtroom trial setting.because courts did examine it, *****.
so i claim you are a ***** for always ignoing that. lol
In court they did. It was a courtroom trial that's how those trials work, legal *****Not in court they didn't. Not before witnesses they didn't. Not in a trial before a jury they didn't. Judges do not investigate voting fraud so the best we can say is that judges looked it over and decided the evidence was insufficient to warrant a further review in a courtroom trial setting.
Yeah sure and they still found nothing.Of course. Most secular courts and judges tied to the secular Democrat mobocracy found ways to avoid examining voting fraud in court, just like Democrats found a way to turn the J-6 protest into a riot to stop Congress from examining the evidence of fraud on that day.
I have dozens of evidence of 2020 fraud that never made it into court, and that have never been debunked by anyone. Those unrefuted evidence of fraud cannot be made invalid by some court decision involving other evidence.In court they did. It was a courtroom trial that's how those trials work, legal *****
You morons were free to provide all the testimony from witnesses you wanted duh
But they decided it was insufficient to rule that fraud occurred
No court found evidence it did not want to find and certainly no court or groups of courts have ever refuted hundreds of examples of 2020 election fraud that were never presented to courts in the first place.Yeah sure and they still found nothing.
you keep repeating that as if it proves anything except what a legal ***** you are lolNo court found evidence it did not want to find and certainly no court or groups of courts have ever refuted hundreds of examples of 2020 election fraud that were never presented to courts in the first place.
I have dozens of evidence of 2020 fraud that never made it into court, and that have never been debunked by anyone. Those unrefuted evidence of fraud cannot be made invalid by some court decision involving other evidence.
As long as you keep promoting the idea that courts disproved the massive evidence of 2020 voting fraud, I will point out that such claims are lies.you keep repeating that as if it proves anything except what a legal ***** you are lol
What courts? Courts that are currently unjustly persecuting Trump for objecting to the 2020 Democrat theft of the election by fraud?so are you too lazy or too stupid to go to court?
or both?
As long as you keep promoting the idea that courts disproved the massive evidence of 2020 voting fraud, I will point out that such claims are lies.