Another election official from the 2020 election has been charged with election fraud

Investigations take time and adequate time was not available between November 2020 and January 2021. Pundits who claimed no fraud had been found by January 2020 were likely mostly right, and the fact that courts found no reason to suspect widespread voting fraud was also likely mostly right, but since that time quite a few election officials and election wards have been charged with criminal 2020 election fraud.

Former Pr. Wm. voter registrar allegedly 'altered 2020 election results;' trial set for January (potomaclocal.com) 12-1-23

PRINCE WILLIAM

Former Pr. Wm. voter registrar allegedly ‘altered 2020 election results;’ trial set for January
If the criterion for pursuit of prosecution or court action is that the effect on the election needs to be so egregious that it would have changed the results of an election, then any single irregularity less than several million votes is a gimme. Morals and virtue on a sliding scale?
 
Werbung:
If the criterion for pursuit of prosecution or court action is that the effect on the election needs to be so egregious that it would have changed the results of an election, then any single irregularity less than several million votes is a gimme. Morals and virtue on a sliding scale?
Charges dropped after the evidence was not credible
 
Charges dropped after the evidence was not credible
Democrats violations of election laws in 2020 cannot be disproven even though liars repeatedly deny the facts. Hundreds of thousands of ballots were irresponsibly mailed to invalid addresses and illegitimate voters, thousands of illegal aliens voted, ballots were received and counted without the required verification documents and evidences, inflated numbers on computer results did not match observers' body counts on election day, Democrats refused to allow the voting machines to be examined by the American public who owned them, ballots were received and counted with the wrong postmark dates or no dates at all, high percentages of ballots were rejected by voting machines and then adjudicated by workers without proper oversight and observation, raising the possibility that tens of thousands of ballots were allocated to the candidates of the unsupervised workers' choice, and so forth.
 
I know you morons losts every court case
Your credible proof would fill a thimble with space left over
No court in the country ordered a forensic examination of the thousands of voting machines to ensure the machines had not been corrupted in spite of the evidence that suggested they had been corrupted, so don't try to prove court failures disprove evidence of voting fraud.,
 
No court in the country ordered a forensic examination of the thousands of voting machines to ensure the machines had not been corrupted in spite of the evidence that suggested they had been corrupted, so don't try to prove court failures disprove evidence of voting fraud.,

no court ordered anything because there was no compelling credible evidence to do so.
duh.
you morons should get some compelling credible evidence to back up your lies :)
 
Democrats violations of election laws in 2020 cannot be disproven even though liars repeatedly deny the facts. Hundreds of thousands of ballots were irresponsibly mailed to invalid addresses and illegitimate voters, thousands of illegal aliens voted, ballots were received and counted without the required verification documents and evidences, inflated numbers on computer results did not match observers' body counts on election day, Democrats refused to allow the voting machines to be examined by the American public who owned them, ballots were received and counted with the wrong postmark dates or no dates at all, high percentages of ballots were rejected by voting machines and then adjudicated by workers without proper oversight and observation, raising the possibility that tens of thousands of ballots were allocated to the candidates of the unsupervised workers' choice, and so forth.

let me know when you have any credible evidence of fraud.
since you couldn't convince a single judge, including those appointed by trump, clearly you are a lying morons.
 
Exactly. It was thrown out. Duuuuh
Of course. Most secular courts and judges tied to the secular Democrat mobocracy found ways to avoid examining voting fraud in court, just like Democrats found a way to turn the J-6 protest into a riot to stop Congress from examining the evidence of fraud on that day.
 
no court ordered anything because there was no compelling credible evidence to do so.
duh.
you morons should get some compelling credible evidence to back up your lies :)
The evidence of voting fraud was not worrisome to those government officials that saw no harm in Democrats winning the election by fraud.
 
let me know when you have any credible evidence of fraud.
since you couldn't convince a single judge, including those appointed by trump, clearly you are a lying morons.
I have a file full of irrefutable evidence of Democrat voting fraud, including massive evidence of 2020 voting fraud.
 
Of course. Most secular courts and judges tied to the secular Democrat mobocracy found ways to avoid examining voting fraud in court, just like Democrats found a way to turn the J-6 protest into a riot to stop Congress from examining the evidence of fraud on that day.
Every court ruled against you morons lol
You are 100 percent losers
 
Werbung:
Back
Top