They are reported as facts, just like the myriads of false allegations against Trump, long before any actual guilt is established. Dummiecraps have even had Trump's name removed from ballots on the stupid presumption of guilt on allegations that have never been proven, in court or outside of court.lol. they aren't actually facts until you prove they are facts, *****. lol
They were stopped because the law says they do not have permission to barge in and take equipment. Of course they were stopped and it was nothing to do with democrats.Here is another example of bent officials resisting investigations into the massive evidence of 2020 voting fraud:
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Blocks Voting Machine Inspection In GOP Election Audit (forbes.com)
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Blocks Voting Machine Inspection In GOP Election Audit
Just get a court order *****Pennsylvania County Will Refuse to Submit Voting Machines for Audit After Threat from Democratic Official (westernjournal.com) 7-14-21
Pennsylvania County Will Refuse to Submit Voting Machines for Audit After Threat from Democratic Official
Reported as facts? Doesn't make them facts *****They are reported as facts, just like the myriads of false allegations against Trump, long before any actual guilt is established. Dummiecraps have even had Trump's name removed from ballots on the stupid presumption of guilt on allegations that have never been proven, in court or outside of court.
Democrats to millions of Americans: 'We are not opposed to voter fraud investigations but the law forces us to adamantly block those investigations for the good of the American people.'They were stopped because the law says they do not have permission to barge in and take equipment. Of course they were stopped and it was nothing to do with democrats.
Why Can't you get that through your thick skull?
You always have some slanted description of an event away from the facts.
Why must Republicans take first voting fraud cases to courts suspected of bias before the Democrats will get involved with investigating the mountain of evidence of 2020 voting fraud?Just get a court order *****
If you have credible evidence duh
You don't just let random audits happen for obvious reasons
Failures to refute the facts reported does not make unsupported denials of the facts very persuasive.Reported as facts? Doesn't make them facts *****
You're lying again. Get someone to drill something into your god ridden atrophied brain.Democrats to millions of Americans: 'We are not opposed to voter fraud investigations but the law forces us to adamantly block those investigations for the good of the American people.'
That is what I said. Democrats claim it is against the law to question the election and/or to examine voting machines, immigration records, bloated voter files, mismatched signatures, unverified ballot dumps after deadlines, and so forth.You're lying again. Get someone to drill something into your god ridden atrophied brain.
It's the law dickhead.
Because that's how life isWhy must Republicans take first voting fraud cases to courts suspected of bias before the Democrats will get involved with investigating the mountain of evidence of 2020 voting fraud?
Nope not what they said lying ***** lolThat is what I said. Democrats claim it is against the law to question the election and/or to examine voting machines, immigration records, bloated voter files, mismatched signatures, unverified ballot dumps after deadlines, and so forth.
Whin8ng without credible facts isn't persuasive to intelligent adultsFailures to refute the facts reported does not make unsupported denials of the facts very persuasive.
True the Vote Wins Federal Election Lawsuit in Georgia | NTD 1-2-24Whin8ng without credible facts isn't persuasive to intelligent adults
Which facts about fraud did that lawsuit prove, *****? LolTrue the Vote Wins Federal Election Lawsuit in Georgia | NTD 1-2-24
True the Vote Wins Federal Election Lawsuit in Georgia
By Dan M. Berger
January 2, 2024Politics
2222
Show me exactly where any noted Democrat official with qualifications and the right to say that, said it.That is what I said. Democrats claim it is against the law to question the election and/or to examine voting machines, immigration records, bloated voter files, mismatched signatures, unverified ballot dumps after deadlines, and so forth.
