Trump charged with election systems breach

[mark francis]

Democrats did not do that but blame them if you want. They were examined by independent qualified experts and found correct, not a rabid bunch of disgruntled hate filled republicans who couldn't read anyway.

As you remember fox lost a massive case about spreading the same rumours you are.
Stick with your Bible idiot. You know fuck all.

Crooks using voting machines to steal votes have always resisted any outsider examination of their corrupted machines, just as they did after the 2020 election. Suspect voting machines in the US years ago were carefully protected by their manufacturer and handlers from examination by non-insiders. The US should not be using voting machines controlled by one party and not available for examination for errors or fraud.

Sequoia Voting Systems - Wikipedia

Threat of legal action against Professor Edward Felten[edit]

In early 2008, New Jersey election officials announced that they planned to send one or more Sequoia Advantage voting machines to Professors Edward Felten and Andrew Appel of Princeton University for analysis. Felten and Appel are computer scientists interested in security issues, especially in regard to electronic voting systems. In March 2008, Sequoia sent an e-mail to Professor Felten asserting that allowing him to examine Sequoia voting machines would violate the license agreement between Sequoia and the county which bought them, and also that Sequoia would take legal action "to stop... non-compliant analysis... publication of Sequoia software... or any other infringement of our intellectual property."[19] This action sparked outrage among computer technology activists.[20] Author and digital rights activist Cory Doctorow commented "It's hard to imagine a stupider legal threat."[21]

 

[mark francis]

It doesn't. They were examined and found correct.

We know more than 80 voting machines failed in Detroit in the 2016 general election. You claim the voting machines were examined and no evidence of fraud was found. I must ask you to support your claim with facts and evidence. How many Detroit voting machines were examined immediately after the 2020 election, who examined them and were the examiners unbiased and qualified, what specific aspects of the machines did they examine, and were their detailed findings made available to the public?

 

[Boris Norris]

We know more than 80 voting machines failed in Detroit in the 2016 general election. You claim the voting machines were examined and no evidence of fraud was found. I must ask you to support your claim with facts and evidence. How many Detroit voting machines were examined immediately after the 2020 election, who examined them and were the examiners unbiased and qualified, what specific aspects of the machines did they examine, and were their detailed findings made available to the public?

Been here before dickhead.
You are wrong and a fool.

 

[Boris Norris]

Crooks using voting machines to steal votes have always resisted any outsider examination of their corrupted machines, just as they did after the 2020 election. Suspect voting machines in the US years ago were carefully protected by their manufacturer and handlers from examination by non-insiders. The US should not be using voting machines controlled by one party and not available for examination for errors or fraud.

Sequoia Voting Systems - Wikipedia

Threat of legal action against Professor Edward Felten[edit]

In early 2008, New Jersey election officials announced that they planned to send one or more Sequoia Advantage voting machines to Professors Edward Felten and Andrew Appel of Princeton University for analysis. Felten and Appel are computer scientists interested in security issues, especially in regard to electronic voting systems. In March 2008, Sequoia sent an e-mail to Professor Felten asserting that allowing him to examine Sequoia voting machines would violate the license agreement between Sequoia and the county which bought them, and also that Sequoia would take legal action "to stop... non-compliant analysis... publication of Sequoia software... or any other infringement of our intellectual property."[19] This action sparked outrage among computer technology activists.[20] Author and digital rights activist Cory Doctorow commented "It's hard to imagine a stupider legal threat."[21]

Blah blah blah