Voting machines can and do flip votes

[pjmret]

Have you ever heard the phrase "statistical impossibility?". For Biden to have gotten 300,000 legitimate votes and Trump none in one unverifiable late night ballot dump is a statistical impossibility.

Sure I have heard morons say many things

Statistics doesn't say something is impossible

Prove the claimed numbers are real for starters with credible sources. I bet you cant

 

[mark francis]

This basically explains your not so reliable source.

Pamela Geller (born 1958) is an American anti-Muslim, far-right political activist, blogger and commentator.[1] Geller promoted birther conspiracy theories about President Barack Obama, saying that he was born in Kenya[5] and that he is a Muslim.[6] She has denied genocides where Muslims were victims, including the Bosnian genocide and the Rohingya genocide.

Can you see a pattern forming

Are you so saying your proof that there were no after,-jours massive ballot dumps for Biden was because Pam Geller? What does that even mea

 

[pjmret]

Are you so saying your proof that there were no after,-jours massive ballot dumps for Biden was because Pam Geller? What does that even mea

I am saying you should prove with credible sources there were fraudulent after hours ballots d7mps for Biden
But you won't because you are a lying *****

 

[mark francis]

I am saying you should prove with credible sources there were fraudulent after hours ballots d7mps for Biden
But you won't because you are a lying *****

Law officers are supposed to investigate evidence of crimes, not civilians.

 

[pjmret]

Law officers are supposed to investigate evidence of crimes, not civilians.

Credible evidence
Not right wing whin8ng

But of course byou can't prove the ballot dumps
You are a lying *****

 

[Boris Norris]

Are you so saying your proof that there were no after,-jours massive ballot dumps for Biden was because Pam Geller? What does that even mea

I saying your whole persistent bullshit about election fraud is bullshyt. I sick of it. Every fucking day about how you were robbed.
Even Trump knew he lost and admitted it. Get over it dickhead. You're paranoid.

 

[Boris Norris]

Have you ever heard the phrase "statistical impossibility?". For Biden to have gotten 300,000 legitimate votes and Trump none in one unverifiable late night ballot dump is a statistical impossibility.

Where's the evidence of that outrageous claim?
Prove it or shut up.

 

[mark francis]

Credible evidence
Not right wing whin8ng

But of course byou can't prove the ballot dumps
You are a lying *****

The evidence of voting fraud deserved, even demanded, official law enforcement investigations that were not conducted, resulting in the ongoing unsettled debates about voting fraud.

 

[mark francis]

I saying your whole persistent bullshit about election fraud is bullshyt. I sick of it. Every fucking day about how you were robbed.
Even Trump knew he lost and admitted it. Get over it dickhead. You're paranoid.

Americans were disserviced by law enforcement for not investigating voting fraud like they were supposed to.

 

[mark francis]

Where's the evidence of that outrageous claim?
Prove it or shut up.

Interpretations of statistical data is not junk science. Here is a lengthy article I will have to seriously crop for space here:

1. Statistical anomalies in the 2020 Presidential Election | Kiwiblog 11-21-20

NOVEMBER 21, 2020 8:51AM BY KIWI IN AMERICA

Statistical anomalies in the 2020 Presidential Election

A good friend is a forensic investigative accountant after serving for a time on the NZ Police Fraud Squad. She specialises in detecting corporate fraud for a variety of private sector companies (often insurance companies) in various countries. She once said the beauty about her profession is that the data cannot lie, and that forensic analysis of statistical records can unearth various anomalies that become the pointers to provable fraud.

1 – Incumbent loss anomaly. Donald Trump is the first incumbent President in 132 years since Grover Cleveland's failed bid for re-election in 1888 to have increased his vote from his initial election and seemingly to still not win re-election.

2 – House of Representative results anomaly. The party whose candidate wins a Presidential election normally increases its representation in the House of Representatives thanks to the campaign momentum of the winning candidate at the top of the ticket. ...This did not happen for Biden in 2020.

3 – Senate results anomaly. ...
... Sidney Powell (a Trump lawyer) estimates that, of those 99,000 excess Biden votes in GA, there were 65,000 votes solely for Biden and no other votes for any other candidate anywhere on the ballot. Biden's current lead in GA is only 12,000.

4 – Swing state anomalies versus Obama's very strong 2008 performance. Biden's leads in swing states are uneven and the difference seems to be who is in control of the voting procedures at the state level. ...
suppression and never conceded and in order to appease her, Kemp and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger entered into a procedural Consent Decree that relaxed the Georgia absentee ballot rules for 2020 and made the auditing process in a recount so complex as to render an audit to be little more than a standard recount which is why the Georgia recount is now the subject of various lawsuits as it is not a full audit because it has no signature reconciliation component as Kemp and Raffensperger negotiated that away.

5 – Bellwether county anomaly. All western first world democratic countries have bellwether districts that election prognosticators look to during result counting as they have gone with the winning party in many elections. ...
And yet strangely Trump won Vigo County in 2020 by a comfortable 56/41 margin or 15 points and he won Valencia County a slightly smaller 10 point margin 54/44!

6 – Thousands of precincts all reporting significant over vote in Michigan. Russell Ramsland of Allied Security Group, LLC of Dallas, TX swore an affidavit concerning a detailed audit his company did on voting machines in Texas in 2018. He wrote in detail of the many serious security inadequacies of the software and then examined the 2020 Presidential vote count in a number of counties in Michigan. He reported that over 3,000 precincts in the state of Michigan reported a vote count between 80 and 350% of registered voters. He lists a number of precincts in his report and in some cases a massive over vote. The vast majority of the precincts on the list were on or about 100%. The whole affidavit makes for interesting reading.


7 = Biden underperforms Obama in 80% of Wisconsin counties but hugely overperforms in just 5 counties. This anomaly was actually covered in my post last week but this time I have put what happened to the Biden vote in table form:

The 5 counties with the disproportionate vote for Biden encompass in order, north west of Milwaukee, outskirts of Minneapolis MN, Madison (a liberal college town and the state capital), eastern suburbs of Milwaukee and northern suburbs of Milwaukee. Obama's and Clinton's votes are distributed along historical Democrat strength patterns as was Trump's vote for Republican areas in 2016 and 2020. Biden's vote is well down across almost all the state and massively even unnaturally up in a few key urban strongholds.

8 = Wayne County, Michigan anomaly. On Tuesday attempts were made to certify the vote in Democrat heavy Wayne County in which Detroit Michigan sits. Initially the decision was deadlocked 2 -2 but after various online attacks, doxxing and threats on a Zoom call the two Republicans on the County Elections Board caved and certified. They have since reversed their decision and filed affidavits alleged intimidation and bullying tactics. One of the Democrats on the Board in his rant on Twitter to heavy his colleagues, uttered some inadvertent but important truths that shed light on yet another anomaly, that of the fact that in fully 71% of precincts in the county, the tally of absentee ballot of those who requested ballots and those who cast ballots was unable to be reconciled because the number of actual absentee ballots counted exceeded the number legally requested. Furthermore, 28% of ballots could not be verified because they have either been lost or destroyed! There is no doubt that Biden would carry a county like this but for the sake of voter integrity, election officials ought not certify until all ballots can be properly reconciled.

 

[mark francis]

Interpretations of statistical data is not junk science. Here is a lengthy article I will have to seriously crop for space here:

1. Statistical anomalies in the 2020 Presidential Election | Kiwiblog 11-21-20

NOVEMBER 21, 2020 8:51AM BY KIWI IN AMERICA

Statistical anomalies in the 2020 Presidential Election

9 = Anomaly of hugely lopsided Biden votes added in minutes in the dead of night. This statistical anomaly was picked up in real time by an analyst awake in Switzerland at around 3am Central Standard Time (CST) of the morning of November 4th watching the results coming in for Wisconsin. He noticed Fox News' election map of Wisconsin went from light red for Trump with a 77% likelihood for Trump to light blue for Biden with an 80% for Biden IN THE SPACE OF MERE MINUTES. He got suspicious of such a massive switch in such a short period of time and so he went to the New York Times minute by minute electronic update from the raw data feed supplied by Edmonds Polling of reported election results and observed this:

“For non-programmers, here is the translation:

Total increase in Trump votes in 5 minutes: 25,163 (1.64%).

Total increase in Biden votes in 5 minutes: 143,379 (10.04%).

Before the Biden vote dump, both candidates' votes were increasing at about the same rate, 1.64% per 5 minutes. So, the “legitimate” Biden vote increase is likely around 23,400 votes. The remaining 119,979 votes are fake.

Here is his analysis of the same trend in Michigan

“At 5:32 AM CST on November 4, total votes were 4,574,555; Trump had 2,346,747 votes (51.3%); Biden 2,150,041 votes (47.0%); other candidates 77,767 votes (1.7%).

Then, still at 5:32 AM CST, only five seconds later than the prior reading, total votes were 4,724,327; Trump had 2,352,715 votes (49.8%); Biden 2,291,299 votes (48.5%); other candidates 80,313 votes (1.7%). In that brief five-second period, Trump's vote total increased by 5,968 (0.25%) while Biden's vote total increased by 141,258 (6.57%)! Folks, that is a clear, fraudulent electronic “ballot dump” for Biden. I calculate that this fraud created about 135,883 fake votes for Basement Joe. ...
Unlike the previous half-hour of counting, this deluge produced almost two Biden votes for every Trump vote counted.

Of those 113K total votes, 40K showed up in the last two minutes – between 6:12 and 6:14 AM. In two minutes, Trump gained 5,665 votes; Biden gained 29,588 votes. That's about 5.2 Biden votes for every Trump vote. Because paper ballots simply cannot be fed into the ballot boxes that quickly, I consider this interval to also be electronic vote fraud, adding about 24,037 fake votes to Biden.

My total count for electronic fraudulent Biden ballots from this 2-hour, 30-minute period is 159,920”

10 – Anomalous turnouts in Wisconsin and Minnesota ...

Are there any statisticians out there that can calculate the odds of this huge voter turnout in these key swing states being a natural and normal trend?

Data for Florida is from here, 2020 turnout here, historical turnouts here and Pennsylvania here:

11 – Pennsylvania's mail in ballot anomaly. ...

This result is statistically impossible and has never been replicated anywhere.



12 – Michigan counties anomalies. MIT PhD engineer Dr. Shiva Ayyaddurai, did an interesting analysis ...

No real vote turns out like this smooth and linear in its progression nor would you expect a margin of Biden over Trump to get bigger the more conservative the precinct and so he hypothesises that a vote switching algorithm is the only logical way to explain such a statistical anomaly.

13 = Same anomaly occurs in Wisconsin. Using Dr Ayyaduria's analytical technique, a Gateway Pundit data analyst compared Dane County results which have the same flat line and normal distribution
and yet 20 miles away in Milwaukee County, the same anomalous trend line found in some Michigan counties are found there.

14 – Virginia has similar ballot count anomalies. Virginia is another state that electronically posted ballot counts through the night of November 3rd which this analysis shows that batch after batch in a perfect 55/45 Biden/Trump split. No large series of separate mail in ballot batches would end up with identical partisan splits time and time again. The statistical likelihood is astronomical. One statistician said it was like Biden winning a coin toss 100 times in a row! Once again, the only logical conclusion is that the count must have been manipulated.

15 = Mail in ballot rejection rates in 2020 defy historical norms.

CONCLUSION. These various statistical patterns raise some serious concerns.

 

[Phoenix68]

Interpretations of statistical data is not junk science. Here is a lengthy article I will have to seriously crop for space here:

1. Statistical anomalies in the 2020 Presidential Election | Kiwiblog 11-21-20

.
..
.​

"Farrar was previously national secretary of the youth wing of the New Zealand National Party, the Young Nationals. During his tenure as national secretary, he survived some media calls for his resignation when he was arrested for his part in a joke press release, along with fellow Young National Michael P Moore, announcing that maverick National MP Michael Laws had been assassinated and that the Prime Minister was one of over 10,000 suspects. The joke press-release was made with the New Zealand Police logo. Farrar and Moore were subsequently arrested, but not convicted of any crime as they chose to participate in a diversion scheme for first time offenders of minor crime. The infamous fax and related media items are now displayed at the Backbencher Bar on Molesworth Street in Wellington, across the road from Parliament."

.​

 

[pjmret]

The evidence of voting fraud deserved, even demanded, official law enforcement investigations that were not conducted, resulting in the ongoing unsettled debates about voting fraud.

nope. if its not credible, intelligent people would just laugh at it and walk away.

 

[pjmret]

9 = Anomaly of hugely lopsided Biden votes added in minutes in the dead of night. This statistical anomaly was picked up in real time by an analyst awake in Switzerland at around 3am Central Standard Time (CST) of the morning of November 4th watching the results coming in for Wisconsin. He noticed Fox News' election map of Wisconsin went from light red for Trump with a 77% likelihood for Trump to light blue for Biden with an 80% for Biden IN THE SPACE OF MERE MINUTES. He got suspicious of such a massive switch in such a short period of time and so he went to the New York Times minute by minute electronic update from the raw data feed supplied by Edmonds Polling of reported election results and observed this:

“For non-programmers, here is the translation:

Total increase in Trump votes in 5 minutes: 25,163 (1.64%).

Total increase in Biden votes in 5 minutes: 143,379 (10.04%).

Before the Biden vote dump, both candidates' votes were increasing at about the same rate, 1.64% per 5 minutes. So, the “legitimate” Biden vote increase is likely around 23,400 votes. The remaining 119,979 votes are fake.

Here is his analysis of the same trend in Michigan

“At 5:32 AM CST on November 4, total votes were 4,574,555; Trump had 2,346,747 votes (51.3%); Biden 2,150,041 votes (47.0%); other candidates 77,767 votes (1.7%).

Then, still at 5:32 AM CST, only five seconds later than the prior reading, total votes were 4,724,327; Trump had 2,352,715 votes (49.8%); Biden 2,291,299 votes (48.5%); other candidates 80,313 votes (1.7%). In that brief five-second period, Trump's vote total increased by 5,968 (0.25%) while Biden's vote total increased by 141,258 (6.57%)! Folks, that is a clear, fraudulent electronic “ballot dump” for Biden. I calculate that this fraud created about 135,883 fake votes for Basement Joe. ...
Unlike the previous half-hour of counting, this deluge produced almost two Biden votes for every Trump vote counted.

Of those 113K total votes, 40K showed up in the last two minutes – between 6:12 and 6:14 AM. In two minutes, Trump gained 5,665 votes; Biden gained 29,588 votes. That's about 5.2 Biden votes for every Trump vote. Because paper ballots simply cannot be fed into the ballot boxes that quickly, I consider this interval to also be electronic vote fraud, adding about 24,037 fake votes to Biden.

My total count for electronic fraudulent Biden ballots from this 2-hour, 30-minute period is 159,920”

10 – Anomalous turnouts in Wisconsin and Minnesota ...

Are there any statisticians out there that can calculate the odds of this huge voter turnout in these key swing states being a natural and normal trend?

Data for Florida is from here, 2020 turnout here, historical turnouts here and Pennsylvania here:

11 – Pennsylvania's mail in ballot anomaly. ...

This result is statistically impossible and has never been replicated anywhere.



12 – Michigan counties anomalies. MIT PhD engineer Dr. Shiva Ayyaddurai, did an interesting analysis ...

No real vote turns out like this smooth and linear in its progression nor would you expect a margin of Biden over Trump to get bigger the more conservative the precinct and so he hypothesises that a vote switching algorithm is the only logical way to explain such a statistical anomaly.

13 = Same anomaly occurs in Wisconsin. Using Dr Ayyaduria's analytical technique, a Gateway Pundit data analyst compared Dane County results which have the same flat line and normal distribution
and yet 20 miles away in Milwaukee County, the same anomalous trend line found in some Michigan counties are found there.

14 – Virginia has similar ballot count anomalies. Virginia is another state that electronically posted ballot counts through the night of November 3rd which this analysis shows that batch after batch in a perfect 55/45 Biden/Trump split. No large series of separate mail in ballot batches would end up with identical partisan splits time and time again. The statistical likelihood is astronomical. One statistician said it was like Biden winning a coin toss 100 times in a row! Once again, the only logical conclusion is that the count must have been manipulated.

15 = Mail in ballot rejection rates in 2020 defy historical norms.

CONCLUSION. These various statistical patterns raise some serious concerns.

your link references the precincts in michigan that were over 100%...which turned out that the ***** doing that analysis got the state wrong. lol.

right wing morons are so stupid they can't even figure out that michigan is not minnesota.
hahahahah
hahahhaha
hahahahahha

 

[Boris Norris]

Interpretations of statistical data is not junk science. Here is a lengthy article I will have to seriously crop for space here:

1. Statistical anomalies in the 2020 Presidential Election | Kiwiblog 11-21-20

NOVEMBER 21, 2020 8:51AM BY KIWI IN AMERICA

Statistical anomalies in the 2020 Presidential Election

A good friend is a forensic investigative accountant after serving for a time on the NZ Police Fraud Squad. She specialises in detecting corporate fraud for a variety of private sector companies (often insurance companies) in various countries. She once said the beauty about her profession is that the data cannot lie, and that forensic analysis of statistical records can unearth various anomalies that become the pointers to provable fraud.

1 – Incumbent loss anomaly. Donald Trump is the first incumbent President in 132 years since Grover Cleveland's failed bid for re-election in 1888 to have increased his vote from his initial election and seemingly to still not win re-election.

2 – House of Representative results anomaly. The party whose candidate wins a Presidential election normally increases its representation in the House of Representatives thanks to the campaign momentum of the winning candidate at the top of the ticket. ...This did not happen for Biden in 2020.

3 – Senate results anomaly. ...
... Sidney Powell (a Trump lawyer) estimates that, of those 99,000 excess Biden votes in GA, there were 65,000 votes solely for Biden and no other votes for any other candidate anywhere on the ballot. Biden's current lead in GA is only 12,000.

4 – Swing state anomalies versus Obama's very strong 2008 performance. Biden's leads in swing states are uneven and the difference seems to be who is in control of the voting procedures at the state level. ...
suppression and never conceded and in order to appease her, Kemp and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger entered into a procedural Consent Decree that relaxed the Georgia absentee ballot rules for 2020 and made the auditing process in a recount so complex as to render an audit to be little more than a standard recount which is why the Georgia recount is now the subject of various lawsuits as it is not a full audit because it has no signature reconciliation component as Kemp and Raffensperger negotiated that away.

5 – Bellwether county anomaly. All western first world democratic countries have bellwether districts that election prognosticators look to during result counting as they have gone with the winning party in many elections. ...
And yet strangely Trump won Vigo County in 2020 by a comfortable 56/41 margin or 15 points and he won Valencia County a slightly smaller 10 point margin 54/44!

6 – Thousands of precincts all reporting significant over vote in Michigan. Russell Ramsland of Allied Security Group, LLC of Dallas, TX swore an affidavit concerning a detailed audit his company did on voting machines in Texas in 2018. He wrote in detail of the many serious security inadequacies of the software and then examined the 2020 Presidential vote count in a number of counties in Michigan. He reported that over 3,000 precincts in the state of Michigan reported a vote count between 80 and 350% of registered voters. He lists a number of precincts in his report and in some cases a massive over vote. The vast majority of the precincts on the list were on or about 100%. The whole affidavit makes for interesting reading.


7 = Biden underperforms Obama in 80% of Wisconsin counties but hugely overperforms in just 5 counties. This anomaly was actually covered in my post last week but this time I have put what happened to the Biden vote in table form:

The 5 counties with the disproportionate vote for Biden encompass in order, north west of Milwaukee, outskirts of Minneapolis MN, Madison (a liberal college town and the state capital), eastern suburbs of Milwaukee and northern suburbs of Milwaukee. Obama's and Clinton's votes are distributed along historical Democrat strength patterns as was Trump's vote for Republican areas in 2016 and 2020. Biden's vote is well down across almost all the state and massively even unnaturally up in a few key urban strongholds.

8 = Wayne County, Michigan anomaly. On Tuesday attempts were made to certify the vote in Democrat heavy Wayne County in which Detroit Michigan sits. Initially the decision was deadlocked 2 -2 but after various online attacks, doxxing and threats on a Zoom call the two Republicans on the County Elections Board caved and certified. They have since reversed their decision and filed affidavits alleged intimidation and bullying tactics. One of the Democrats on the Board in his rant on Twitter to heavy his colleagues, uttered some inadvertent but important truths that shed light on yet another anomaly, that of the fact that in fully 71% of precincts in the county, the tally of absentee ballot of those who requested ballots and those who cast ballots was unable to be reconciled because the number of actual absentee ballots counted exceeded the number legally requested. Furthermore, 28% of ballots could not be verified because they have either been lost or destroyed! There is no doubt that Biden would carry a county like this but for the sake of voter integrity, election officials ought not certify until all ballots can be properly reconciled.

Why wasn't it presented to the courts?
It's bullshyt. Just one GOP sympathisers opinion.