Another election official from the 2020 election has been charged with election fraud

[Boris Norris]

You say the evidence was not presented in time to stop the crooks from stealing the election, yet you do not try to refute the evidence of 2020 voting fraud we still have today.

I cannot refute something that doesn't exist. You cannot prove there's a god because you have no evidence.

 

[Boris Norris]

Courts have demonstrated their inability or unwillingness to investigate voting fraud evidence before a jury.

They are not unable in the case of Trump where there is evidence.
No evidence, no court case.

 

[pjmret]

By fighting like hell against investigations that could exonerate Democrats and disprove voting fraud evidence against them the Democrats prove they do not want the facts examined because they fear what might come out.

Nope
You morons lost and can't stop whining

 

[mark francis]

I cannot refute something that doesn't exist. You cannot prove there's a god because you have no evidence.

Nobody should invite you to participate in a two-sided discussion of voting fraud evidence you know nothing about.

 

[mark francis]

They are not unable in the case of Trump where there is evidence.
No evidence, no court case.

Courts should never be asked to weigh in on evidence of voting fraud that does not exist. However, it would help mend divisions between the left and right in America if courts would take some voting fraud cases and examine them in court before a jury.

 

[mark francis]

Nope
You morons lost and can't stop whining

Christians have nothing to whine about but the unsaved have a great number of worries and fears with no comfort.

 

[pjmret]

Christians have nothing to whine about but the unsaved have a great number of worries and fears with no comfort.

You whine constantly
Guess you aren't a Christian

 

[mark francis]

You whine constantly
Guess you aren't a Christian

I may be deceived but I pray God I am not. And I pray God that others will turn to Him for forgiveness of their sins before they end up in hell's dead end.

 

[Boris Norris]

Courts should never be asked to weigh in on evidence of voting fraud that does not exist.

Exactly. That's what they did. No evidence. No court.

However, it would help mend divisions between the left and right in America if courts would take some voting fraud cases and examine them in court before a jury.

 

[Boris Norris]

Nobody should invite you to participate in a two-sided discussion of voting fraud evidence you know nothing about.

And you should get an invitation above everyone else? Because you're a nutter? Your position in the whole voter fraud thing is for Maga nutters.

 

[pjmret]

I may be deceived but I pray God I am not. And I pray God that others will turn to Him for forgiveness of their sins before they end up in hell's dead end.

You are deceived and also a whiner

 

[mark francis]

Exactly. That's what they did. No evidence. No court.

Courts could not disprove evidence of voting fraud, so they simply dismissed the evidence without proof.

 

[mark francis]

And you should get an invitation above everyone else? Because you're a nutter? Your position in the whole voter fraud thing is for Maga nutters.

One sided courts are called kangaroo courts, and we do not need kangaroo courts deciding who gets to rule over Americans with an iron fist.

 

[pjmret]

Courts could not disprove evidence of voting fraud, so they simply dismissed the evidence without proof.

nope. that's not how courts work.
you enjoy looking like a legal *****.

 

[mark francis]

nope. that's not how courts work.
you enjoy looking like a legal *****.

You are right. Courts unwilling to risk being destroyed by leftist politicians and news organizations will hardly be expected to do the right thing in getting to the bottom of the voting fraud evidence.