2020 Democrat election official to sheriff: I don't care who you are, nobody looks at our voting machines without democrat party approval

mark francis

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2021
Messages
26,954
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/constitutional-sheriff-tried-seize-voting-machines-2020-officials-are-rcna177906 11-3-24

A 'constitutional sheriff' tried to seize voting machines in 2020. Officials are bracing for a repeat.
+++++++++++++++++++++
Dominion official was caught on tape saying he would make sure Trump did not win.


Did a Dominion Voting Systems Employee Brag About Rigging the Election Against Trump? | Snopes.com
Fact Check

Did a Dominion Voting Systems Employee Brag About Rigging the Election Against Trump?

Eric Coomer, director of product strategy and security for Dominion Voting Systems, bragged about rigging the 2020 election against Donald Trump in an antifa conference call.

What did Snopes say about the claim? They could not prove Eric Coomer did not make the claim.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++


Don't worry, democrats, Dominion and the democrat party will not allow republicans to examine the voting machines after elections because the proven corruptible machines are shielded by democrats from investigations on the basis of Dominion patent rights. Dominion can program its machines to secretly create a win for a particular candidate and nobody will ever be the wiser because the machines can never be examined for such corruption in keeping with patent laws.
 
Werbung:
So the only acceptable voting machines would be those that the Democrats reject? Is that what you're telling us, Bozo?
 
So the only acceptable voting machines would be those that the Democrats reject? Is that what you're telling us, Bozo?
The only machines that have been proven were not corrupted were those machines properly examined and found to have remained clean.
 
How many were examined in 2016?
I don't know. But voting machine problems have cast election results into doubt for more than a decade.

Security Evaluation of ES&S Voting Machines and Election Management System (usenix.org) July 2007

Despite our admittedly incomplete analysis, we identified numerous critical vulnerabilities in nearly every component of the ES&S system. We describe serious practical and undetectable attacks that could be carried out by pollworkers, and in many cases, individual voters. (As a noteworthy example, a voter can surreptitiously delete all vote data and audit logs stored on a touchscreen voting machine using a Palm handheld device and a small magnet.) Such attacks could alter or forge precinct results, install corrupt firmware, and erase audit records. Of particular concern, several attacks could spread virally, propagating between voting machines and backend systems, and vice versa.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Voting Machine Audit Logs Raise More Questions about Lost Votes in California Election | WIRED

1-13-2009

SECURITY

Voting Machine Audit Logs Raise More Questions about Lost Votes in California Election

Computer audit logs showing what occurred on a vote tabulation system that lost ballots in the November election are raising more questions not only about how the votes were lost, but also about the general reliability of voting system audit logs to record what occurs during an election and to ensure the integrity of results. […]
+++++++++++++++++

Why Haven't ES&S Voting Machines Been Outlawed? | Crooks and Liars 6-12-10


By
Karoli Kuns — June 12, 2010

No one with any sense at all believes Alvin Greene won the South Carolina primary fairly. It doesn't pass the smell test, not even the argument that his name was at the top of the ballot and was simply chosen by its place. There was a similar situation in my district in 2008, but the winner didn't win by 17 percentage points! Any way you slice this, it stinks.

Leave aside the question of how the hapless Mr. Greene found a checking account and over $10,000 for a minute. The machines used in the South Carolina primaries are ES&S IVotronic voting machines. These machines have quite a history.
++++++++++++++++++++++



Electronic Voting Machine Problems Raise Early Concerns | Fox News 12-23-15

Published December 23, 2015 11:40pm EST​

Electronic Voting Machine Problems Raise Early Concerns

By Ed Barnes , | Fox News


An iVotronic voting machine.

Early monitoring of voting around the country is raising concerns about electronic voting machines in key battleground states -- especially in Pennsylvania, where machines are registering Democratic votes instead of Republican, and vice versa.
 
I don't know. But voting machine problems have cast election results into doubt for more than a decade.

Security Evaluation of ES&S Voting Machines and Election Management System (usenix.org) July 2007

Despite our admittedly incomplete analysis, we identified numerous critical vulnerabilities in nearly every component of the ES&S system. We describe serious practical and undetectable attacks that could be carried out by pollworkers, and in many cases, individual voters. (As a noteworthy example, a voter can surreptitiously delete all vote data and audit logs stored on a touchscreen voting machine using a Palm handheld device and a small magnet.) Such attacks could alter or forge precinct results, install corrupt firmware, and erase audit records. Of particular concern, several attacks could spread virally, propagating between voting machines and backend systems, and vice versa.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Voting Machine Audit Logs Raise More Questions about Lost Votes in California Election | WIRED

1-13-2009

SECURITY

Voting Machine Audit Logs Raise More Questions about Lost Votes in California Election

Computer audit logs showing what occurred on a vote tabulation system that lost ballots in the November election are raising more questions not only about how the votes were lost, but also about the general reliability of voting system audit logs to record what occurs during an election and to ensure the integrity of results. […]
+++++++++++++++++

Why Haven't ES&S Voting Machines Been Outlawed? | Crooks and Liars 6-12-10


By Karoli Kuns — June 12, 2010

No one with any sense at all believes Alvin Greene won the South Carolina primary fairly. It doesn't pass the smell test, not even the argument that his name was at the top of the ballot and was simply chosen by its place. There was a similar situation in my district in 2008, but the winner didn't win by 17 percentage points! Any way you slice this, it stinks.

Leave aside the question of how the hapless Mr. Greene found a checking account and over $10,000 for a minute. The machines used in the South Carolina primaries are ES&S IVotronic voting machines. These machines have quite a history.
++++++++++++++++++++++



Electronic Voting Machine Problems Raise Early Concerns | Fox News 12-23-15

Published December 23, 2015 11:40pm EST​

Electronic Voting Machine Problems Raise Early Concerns

By Ed Barnes , | Fox News


An iVotronic voting machine.

Early monitoring of voting around the country is raising concerns about electronic voting machines in key battleground states -- especially in Pennsylvania, where machines are registering Democratic votes instead of Republican, and vice versa.
Thanks for admitting you are a clueless liar
 
Thanks for admitting you are a clueless liar
You seem ignorant of the history of problems with voting machines. The machines should have been examined for corruption after the 2020 machines yielded more votes for Biden than were registered to vote in the precincts.
 
You seem ignorant of the history of problems with voting machines. The machines should have been examined for corruption after the 2020 machines yielded more votes for Biden than were registered to vote in the precincts.
You seem ignorant
Period lol

Prove precincts had more votes with credible independent experts lying moooron
Because that would be front page news
But you won't lol
 
What we have in Florida are not really machines, they are simply scanners. Voters fill out a ballot by filling in circles on the ballot, and then the poll worker feeds the ballot into the scanner. The scanner is not connected to any computer system. The paper ballot, with the voter's signature is kept in case there a need for a recount.

There is no way to fool the machine into misrecording the vote, as all it does is count.
 
What we have in Florida are not really machines, they are simply scanners. Voters fill out a ballot by filling in circles on the ballot, and then the poll worker feeds the ballot into the scanner. The scanner is not connected to any computer system. The paper ballot, with the voter's signature is kept in case there a need for a recount.

There is no way to fool the machine into misrecording the vote, as all it does is count.
Is that because Florida is a state that cares about voting security?
 
Werbung:
Back
Top