You believe the election was not stolen because you want to and wrongly assume Democrats must be telling the truth by denying the fraud because courts refused to examine individual examples of fraud in trials before juries.
no i believe it because you lost over 60 courts cases. you keep "forgetting" to mention you couldn't convince a single judge, including trump appointed ones, of your cases. lol
Any judge who claimed fraud did not occur but refused to examine a fraud case in court is a bent individual.
You seem willing to believe dirty Democrat crooks and thugs would have never committed voter fraud in spite of committing massive violent anti-American riots in the months prior to the election. And you support your belief on the silly idea that the inability of courts to uncover the hidden evidence of fraud must prove no fraud occurred.
Democrats called arson, looting, assaults on cops, invasions of government buildings and other violence "summer of live peaceful protests." Nobody should be surprised when these mal-contented anti-American rioters call protests against fraud an "insurrection."i know they were accused of sedition by VIOLENTLY RIOTING and trying to prevent the constitutionally elected president from taking office.
dont try to deny it.
name a single american who was accused of sedition for MERELYI "opposing" the results of election? I dare you
Courts do not investigate fraud and cannot prove massive fraud did not occur in spite of the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
I don't know why so many judges treated voting fraud so lightly and refused to make sure election officials did all they could to assure Americans that massive evidence of fraud and obstruction was not what it seemed.
I can prove that leftists called mostly peaceful protests against fraud "extremely violent" and mostly violent leftist riots "mostly peaceful and justified."
Courts cannot disprove fraud occurred.
