Is Communism dying in China?

[Gabriel_Bell]

Thanks for those pictures--the real things are always more interesting to me.

China--is a world unto to it's own.
A homogenous people--a big advantage.
They have a history of a controlled population.
That--is the big danger they pose to the world.
They are a totalitarian society--and they believe in it.
Mostly--out of necessity.
They know how to live under an astringent society.
Freedom--in general--will diminish as the world become over-crowded--like China is (to some extent--resource-wise).
Europe stands to lose the most,
America, Australia--could subsist without any other help forever.
Europe--cannot--without the Russians (Eurasians, I suppose one might say). It is also too populous.
That's why I think Russia is in the best position of all.
If--they are careful.

No, you are wrong. China has around 1,121,000,000 people, and there are 56 ethnic groups besides the majority Han Chinese group.
That is 107,690,000 people.
297 different languages are spoken in China. Mandarin is taught in schools, but 955,000,000 people speak something other than Mandarin, the language spoken in Beijing.
Chinese writing is not phonetic and does not depend on any spoken language.

If you have a nation of 1,121,000,000 people, then regardless of the political system, each individual can only have a very, very tiny amount of political power. I think the Chinese know a LOT MORE about their own country than you and I ever will.

Russia has always been very poorly governed and is people have never had much say about how resources are allocated.
The population of Russia is shrinking... every day there are fewer Russians, and the longevity is declining and has been for some time, alcoholism is a major problem.

 

[pjmret]

It's not communist now it's a mixed economy
Socialist and capitalistic

 

[mark francis]

It's not communist now it's a mixed economy
Socialist and capitalistic

The new world order has been touted to be a mixture of socialism and capitalism. The problem with the new world order version of capitalism is that it is not capitalism at all but fascist totalitarian government Marxist fascism. Democrats, leftists, and new world order enthusiasts are looking to reinvent capitalism because the traditional form of American capitalism allowed for private ownership of property, creating wealth by hard work, and keeping that wealth in spite of the plights of the poor who want or need Marxist redistribution of wealth policies in order to collect more money than they can under the old capitalist system.

The old capitalism will no longer exist under the new leftist one world order version of capitalism.


Why the next stage of capitalism is coming (bbc.com) 5-26-21

Why the next stage of capitalism is coming

 

[pjmret]

The new world order has been touted to be a mixture of socialism and capitalism. The problem with the new world order version of capitalism is that it is not capitalism at all but fascist totalitarian government Marxist fascism. Democrats, leftists, and new world order enthusiasts are looking to reinvent capitalism because the traditional form of American capitalism allowed for private ownership of property, creating wealth by hard work, and keeping that wealth in spite of the plights of the poor who want or need Marxist redistribution of wealth policies in order to collect more money than they can under the old capitalist system.

The old capitalism will no longer exist under the new leftist one world order version of capitalism.


Why the next stage of capitalism is coming (bbc.com) 5-26-21

Why the next stage of capitalism is coming

the us has always been a mixture of capitalism and socialism for example. so the new world order started in the 1700s here? lol

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

It's not communist now it's a mixed economy
Socialist and capitalistic

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

There is no country on this planet that is 100% capitalist or 100% communist or 100% anything else.

 

[mark francis]

the us has always been a mixture of capitalism and socialism for example. so the new world order started in the 1700s here? lol

Stakeholder capitalism is the new leftist Marxist form of substitute capitalism opposed by all who love freedom and prosperity.

 

[pjmret]

Stakeholder capitalism is the new leftist Marxist form of substitute capitalism opposed by all who love freedom and prosperity.

You support socialism so lecturing others is hypocrisy

 

[mark francis]

There is no country on this planet that is 100% capitalist or 100% communist or 100% anything else.

At least for now reasonably free Americans still have the right to totally reject the new Democrat plan to convert America to stakeholder capitalism.

 

[mark francis]

You support socialism so lecturing others is hypocrisy

I do support small government services some leftists falsely claim are justifications for converting to more invasive Marxist government control by fascist Democrat oligarchs.

 

[pjmret]

I do support small government services some leftists falsely claim are justifications for converting to more invasive Marxist government control by fascist Democrat oligarchs.

So you support socialism you are just to cowardly to use the word lol

 

[mark francis]

So you support socialism you are just to cowardly to use the word lol

I do not approve of socialism that is designed by fascist Marxists opposed to free market American capitalism.

 

[pjmret]

I do not approve of socialism that is designed by fascist Marxists opposed to free market American capitalism.

You support socialism you admitted it

 

[mark francis]

You support socialism you admitted it

I do support reasonable social policies, but not unreasonable socialism.

Howie Carr: Biden's endless handouts to the deadbeats (bostonherald.com) 2-24-24

Howie Carr: Biden’s endless handouts to the deadbeats

 

[pjmret]

I do support reasonable social policies, but not unreasonable socialism.

Howie Carr: Biden's endless handouts to the deadbeats (bostonherald.com) 2-24-24

Howie Carr: Biden’s endless handouts to the deadbeats

You support socialism