I am pretty sure Mueller admitted he did not look into the Seth Rich possibility of transferring DNC emails to Assange and instead focused on lies perpetrated by Democrats and Russians claiming Trump has something to do with it. Thankfully, after 3 years and tens of millions of dollars Mueller discovered what Fox News had been reporting all along - Trump had nothing to do with it.
What evidence? That evidence you presented to the courts? How did that go? Courts don't have to disprove anything. That's a cop out because you know Trump is guilty and is going to jail. Pray for him.
There is definitely something fishy going on here. First the FBI claimed it did not know who killed Seth Rich or why and then claimed it did not have his computer. When forced to admit it had Rich's computer years later by court order which directed the FBI to release the data it had gathered from the computer the FBI said it would take decades to release the data practically one page at a time to indefinitely delay obeying the court order. That is not transparency and justice, that is obfuscation and cover up.
Pretty sure? Now you are backtracking like a true liar lol
If Mueller admitted he investigated the rumored Seth Rich connection to the exfiltrated DNC emails, then I must have missed it. I do know Mueller came up empty in his alleged search for the guilty party in the DNC email transfer to Assange.
Why do you think everything in an investigation is made public
What was made public is that Mueller did not find how or who exfiltrated DNC emails from DNC headquarters to Assange. Leftists, intent on avoiding any spotlight on the Seth Rich murder claimed that Mueller proved Seth Rich had nothing to do with the email transfer, in spite of the evidence to the contrary, by indicting 12 Russians. That is one of the stupidest attempts to deceive or evade associated with the Mueller failure.
www.rollingstone.com
What was made public is that Mueller did not find how or who exfiltrated DNC emails from DNC headquarters to Assange. Leftists, intent on avoiding any spotlight on the Seth Rich murder claimed that Mueller proved Seth Rich had nothing to do with the email transfer, in spite of the evidence to the contrary, by indicting 12 Russians. That is one of the stupidest attempts to deceive or evade associated with the Mueller failure.
If Mueller had proven, on the other hand, that Russians and only Russians were involved, that would give the argument against the Rich connection some support. But Mueller did not prove that at all. In fact Mueller avoided entering into courtrooms to try his case in front of a judge and jury because he knew his case was bogus, as proven by CrowdStrike's testimony that nobody knew how the emails were exfiltrated or who might have done it.
This Is Robert Mueller's Chance to Dismantle the Seth Rich Conspiracy Theory
Robert Mueller could demolish one of the most viral and cruel conspiracy theories of the Trump era.
This April, Mueller’s final redacted report concluded WikiLeaks had obtained the leaked emails from cutouts used by Russian intelligence. Assange and WikiLeaks’ public statements about Rich, the report goes on to say, were “apparently designed to obscure the source of the materials that WikiLeaks was releasing.”
Mueller’s brief section about Rich and WikiLeaks specifically accused Assange of “dissembling” about the source of the stolen DNC emails. It also says that Assange “implied falsely” that Rich was his source. On Wednesday, Mueller has the opportunity to translate this dry legalese into a clear, full-throated rebuke of the Rich conspiracy theorists.
What was made public was CrowdStrike's testimony before Congress that nobody knows who stole DNC emails and gave them to Assange or who did it.
www.crowdstrike.com
This article you trust in is another lying leftist coverup of the facts. There are so many lies it is hard to tell where to begin. What the Democrats and their leftist supporters claim should be checked against other records for verification, because they lie all the time. Surely you have heard the claim that intelligence officials lied about WMDs in Iraq. Likewise, Brennan and his pals colluded with Democrats to lie about the 'Russian hack' that turned out to not have been a hack at all.Did CrowdStrike have proof that Russia hacked the DNC?
Yes, and this is also supported by the U.S. Intelligence community and independent Congressional reports.
Following a comprehensive investigation that CrowdStrike detailed publicly, the company concluded in May 2016 that two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries breached the DNC network.
To reference, CrowdStrike’s account of their DNC investigation, published on June 14, 2016, “CrowdStrike Services Inc., our Incident Response group, was called by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the formal governing body for the US Democratic Party, to respond to a suspected breach. We deployed our IR team and technology and immediately identified two sophisticated adversaries on the network – COZY BEAR and FANCY BEAR…. At DNC, COZY BEAR intrusion has been identified going back to summer of 2015, while FANCY BEAR separately breached the network in April 2016.”
This conclusion has most recently been supported by the Senate Intelligence Committee in April 2020 issuing a report [intelligence.senate.gov] validating the previous conclusions of the Intelligence community, published on January 6, 2017, that Russia was behind the DNC data breach.
Our Work with the DNC: Setting the record straight
Get the key facts about CrowdStrike's work with the Democratic Natiional Committee in 2016 and debunk the false claims that have been made about our work.
you're a moron. lol. right from crowdstrike's web pages. duh
Stop calling me a moron. You are the one who accepts one side of thew story offered by those who are intent of denying facts clearly known and understood by those publishing from the other side of the story. No case can be justly decided if only one side is allowed to present evidence (as in Trump's impeachment fiasco, for example) while the other side is silenced. Maybe I should try to point out a few of dozens of problems with your posted CrowdStrike testimony.
