My point was more on the other side...say you catch a lowe leval guy, it does not mean he may not have info as well. He could just as well give you very valuble intel ...My point is that, anyone could have info....yes of course a top guy will have more, but it does not mean the rest have no info...so do just toruture them all and find out?
Of course not. That's illogical at face value. Why would you waste countless days if not weeks, interrogating someone who could possibly know nothing, when you could be focusing on those you know for a fact do?
It would be better to hunt down leadership personnel and again, only waterboard if needed. Most will break over a long period of time. The issue in 2002 was that the CIA thought there was no time. They needed the information NOW to make sure there wasn't secondary plans in the works.
Again they will like, tell you what you want, what ever they do say will be hard to verify, you will not know the motive to why they told you, and they may still not say anything as they may be trained. Though Anyone can be broken ...McCain is a good example do you belive the things he signed or what ever as a POW...no I am guessing, but he still said/signed it...thats basicly what you get with those tactics...
Again... what they said was verified, and it was highly accurate. So you can't say it will be hard to verify.. when it wasn't. We don't need the motive, just the information. The information given led to the capture of many AQ terrorist members and planners. I couldn't care less what motivation he had, we captured many major fish in the AQ network. What else matters?
Apple and Oranges. Let us say that McCain (who supports the use of waterboarding) was tortured into signing a statement denouncing the US. This is not even comparable. The purpose of their actions is to get McCain to say something they know he doesn't believe or support, for the purpose of propaganda. It's to demoralize both prisoners and the enemy, while showing themselves strong to the public.
We are not trying to get them to say something we know is wrong. We are not trying to gain propaganda. We are not attempting to demoralize. We are simply trying to find information to save peoples lives.
Again, since we KNOW they have information, if they did MAKE UP stuff, we would verify and know it was false, and they would end up waterboarded again. Which is why they don't make up stuff. The information given was highly accurate. Of course this duck-tails my point above, being that we only do this on people we KNOW have information..