What Mark Francis Doesn't Like To Talk-About

Werbung:
The most current scientific theory is that the universe is a simulation, which requires a writer, which they do not call god but a simulation writer. So science has accepted god,kiddy
Show the current scientific "theory" AND requires a writer. I'll bet you can't.
 
Show the current scientific "theory" AND requires a writer. I'll bet you can't.
Well you just lost your bet

Nick Bostrom

The simulation hypothesis, as formulated by Nick Bostrom, is part of a long tradition of skeptical scenarios. It was presented by Bostrom as not merely a philosophical speculation, but an empirical claim with quantifiable probabilities.
 
Well you just lost your bet

Nick Bostrom

The simulation hypothesis, as formulated by Nick Bostrom, is part of a long tradition of skeptical scenarios
It was presented by Bostrom as not merely a philosophical speculation, but an empirical claim with quantifiable probabilities.
You forgot to include this but but your cut from wiki.
I did not lose a bet wanker.

claim with quantifiable probabilities. The hypothesis has received criticism from some physicists, such as Sabine Hossenfelder who has called it pseudoscience,[4] and cosmologist George F. R. Ellis, who stated that "[the hypothesis] is totally impracticable from a technical viewpoint", and that "late-night pub discussion is not a viable theory".[5][6] Versions of the hypothesis have also been featured in science fiction, appearing as a central plot device in many stories and films, such as The Matrix.[7]

Let's not cherry pick any more. Your not smart enough.
 
You forgot to include this but but your cut from wiki.
I did not lose a bet wanker.

claim with quantifiable probabilities. The hypothesis has received criticism from some physicists, such as Sabine Hossenfelder who has called it pseudoscience,[4] and cosmologist George F. R. Ellis, who stated that "[the hypothesis] is totally impracticable from a technical viewpoint", and that "late-night pub discussion is not a viable theory".[5][6] Versions of the hypothesis have also been featured in science fiction, appearing as a central plot device in many stories and films, such as The Matrix.[7]

Let's not cherry pick any more. Your not smart enough.

This is your science
 

This is your science
Unless it's proven without doubt either way, it's pure piffle. But godbotherers like you have never concerned yourself about evidence.
Just cherry pick beliefs and then it suddenly morphs into fact. You a loser dickhead.
 
Unless it's proven without doubt either way, it's pure piffle. But godbotherers like you have never concerned yourself about evidence.
Just cherry pick beliefs and then it suddenly morphs into fact. You a loser dickhead.
So your theory that the universe created itself because nothing got tired of being nothing and created itself is pure piffle as you say.

Glad that you see it my way
 
Unless it's proven without doubt either way, it's pure piffle. But godbotherers like you have never concerned yourself about evidence.
Just cherry pick beliefs and then it suddenly morphs into fact. You a loser dickhead.
So every theory is piffle to you, because no theory is proven
 
I think you should check the real meaning of theory. Try wiki.
I think you should check your Thorazine dosage.

A theory never becomes a fact. It is an explanation of one or more facts. A well-supported evidence-based theory becomes acceptable until disproved. It never evolves to a fact, and that's a fact.
 
I think you should check your Thorazine dosage.

A theory never becomes a fact. It is an explanation of one or more facts. A well-supported evidence-based theory becomes acceptable until disproved. It never evolves to a fact, and that's a fact.
This will make it clearer for you. Btw. Your definition defines the theory of god.


A theory is a rational type of abstract thinking about a phenomenon, or the results of such thinking. The process of contemplative and rational thinking is often associated with such processes as observational study or research. Theories may be scientific, belong to a non-scientific discipline, or no discipline at all. Depending on the context, a theory's assertions might, for example, include generalized explanations of how nature works. The word has its roots in ancient Greek, but in modern use it has taken on several related meanings.

In modern science, the term "theory" refers to scientific theories, a well-confirmed type of explanation of nature, made in a way consistent with the scientific method, and fulfilling the criteria required by modern science. Such theories are described in such a way that scientific tests should be able to provide empirical support for it, or empirical contradiction ("falsify") of it. Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge,[1] in contrast to more common uses of the word "theory" that imply that something is unproven or speculative.
 
This will make it clearer for you. Btw. Your definition defines the theory of god.


A theory is a rational type of abstract thinking about a phenomenon, or the results of such thinking. The process of contemplative and rational thinking is often associated with such processes as observational study or research. Theories may be scientific, belong to a non-scientific discipline, or no discipline at all. Depending on the context, a theory's assertions might, for example, include generalized explanations of how nature works. The word has its roots in ancient Greek, but in modern use it has taken on several related meanings.

In modern science, the term "theory" refers to scientific theories, a well-confirmed type of explanation of nature, made in a way consistent with the scientific method, and fulfilling the criteria required by modern science. Such theories are described in such a way that scientific tests should be able to provide empirical support for it, or empirical contradiction ("falsify") of it. Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge,[1] in contrast to more common uses of the word "theory" that imply that something is unproven or speculative.
Not reading, I might read it later if I need a good laugh.

And there is nothing that you can do to make yourself meaningful
 
Werbung:
You read alright and discovered your wrong. Suck eggs idiot.
I read that as you kept it to one sentence. The sad thing about schizzos like you is that your grandiosity tells you that everyone cares about your grand writings, when the complete opposite is true.

This is the word of the Lord

maxresdefault.jpg
 
Back
Top