Phoenix68
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2022
- Messages
- 12,336
I don't know anything about him...
I don't know anything about him...
Show the current scientific "theory" AND requires a writer. I'll bet you can't.The most current scientific theory is that the universe is a simulation, which requires a writer, which they do not call god but a simulation writer. So science has accepted god,kiddy
Well you just lost your betShow the current scientific "theory" AND requires a writer. I'll bet you can't.
Well you just lost your bet
Nick Bostrom
The simulation hypothesis, as formulated by Nick Bostrom, is part of a long tradition of skeptical scenarios
You forgot to include this but but your cut from wiki.It was presented by Bostrom as not merely a philosophical speculation, but an empirical claim with quantifiable probabilities.
You forgot to include this but but your cut from wiki.
I did not lose a bet wanker.
claim with quantifiable probabilities. The hypothesis has received criticism from some physicists, such as Sabine Hossenfelder who has called it pseudoscience,[4] and cosmologist George F. R. Ellis, who stated that "[the hypothesis] is totally impracticable from a technical viewpoint", and that "late-night pub discussion is not a viable theory".[5][6] Versions of the hypothesis have also been featured in science fiction, appearing as a central plot device in many stories and films, such as The Matrix.[7]
Let's not cherry pick any more. Your not smart enough.
Unless it's proven without doubt either way, it's pure piffle. But godbotherers like you have never concerned yourself about evidence.
This is your science
So your theory that the universe created itself because nothing got tired of being nothing and created itself is pure piffle as you say.Unless it's proven without doubt either way, it's pure piffle. But godbotherers like you have never concerned yourself about evidence.
Just cherry pick beliefs and then it suddenly morphs into fact. You a loser dickhead.
I never said that is my theory, you did.So your theory that the universe created itself because nothing got tired of being nothing and created itself is pure piffle as you say.
Glad that you see it my way
So every theory is piffle to you, because no theory is provenUnless it's proven without doubt either way, it's pure piffle. But godbotherers like you have never concerned yourself about evidence.
Just cherry pick beliefs and then it suddenly morphs into fact. You a loser dickhead.
I think you should check the real meaning of theory. Try wiki.So every theory is piffle to you, because no theory is proven
I think you should check your Thorazine dosage.I think you should check the real meaning of theory. Try wiki.
This will make it clearer for you. Btw. Your definition defines the theory of god.I think you should check your Thorazine dosage.
A theory never becomes a fact. It is an explanation of one or more facts. A well-supported evidence-based theory becomes acceptable until disproved. It never evolves to a fact, and that's a fact.
Not reading, I might read it later if I need a good laugh.This will make it clearer for you. Btw. Your definition defines the theory of god.
A theory is a rational type of abstract thinking about a phenomenon, or the results of such thinking. The process of contemplative and rational thinking is often associated with such processes as observational study or research. Theories may be scientific, belong to a non-scientific discipline, or no discipline at all. Depending on the context, a theory's assertions might, for example, include generalized explanations of how nature works. The word has its roots in ancient Greek, but in modern use it has taken on several related meanings.
In modern science, the term "theory" refers to scientific theories, a well-confirmed type of explanation of nature, made in a way consistent with the scientific method, and fulfilling the criteria required by modern science. Such theories are described in such a way that scientific tests should be able to provide empirical support for it, or empirical contradiction ("falsify") of it. Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge,[1] in contrast to more common uses of the word "theory" that imply that something is unproven or speculative.
You read alright and discovered your wrong. Suck eggs idiot.Not reading, I might read it later if I need a good laugh.
And there is nothing that you can do to make yourself meaningful
I read that as you kept it to one sentence. The sad thing about schizzos like you is that your grandiosity tells you that everyone cares about your grand writings, when the complete opposite is true.You read alright and discovered your wrong. Suck eggs idiot.