Voting machines can and do flip votes

[pjmret]

You don't explain why courts took voting fraud cases before bipartisan investigations into the emerging evidence of fraud were authorized and carried out by election officials. Were courts expected to rule on the evidence before the evidence had been thoroughly examined?

why would courts not take them when they were presented to the courts? duh.
the people starting the lawsuit thought they had credible evidence, s the courts acted. duh.

you are a legal *****.

 

[pjmret]

Yes, Democrats who claim the fraud cases were thoroughly examined by bipartisan experts and found to be false are lying. Democrats began lying about investigations almost as soon as the polls closed, proving they lied because there had not been sufficient time for investigations to have been authorized and initiated.

well you can't deny that independent experts did do investigations and found nothing.
and you can't deny that not a single court found your evidence credible.

here in america its up to you to prove your case, comrade

 

[pjmret]

Not true. Evidence of voting fraud and affidavits alleging eyewitness accounts of fraud emerged from around the nation just hours after polls closed. Leftists mouths began claiming just days after the election that the evidence had been examined thoroughly and irrefutably disproven, which was not even possible in that short of a time period. Democrats continue to lie to cover up their election fraud and have never disproven the majority of voting fraud evidence.

so the arizona gop inestigation found proof of fraud? no? lol.

well, cyber ninjas were morons, we can agree on that.

 

[mark francis]

why would courts not take them when they were presented to the courts? duh.
the people starting the lawsuit thought they had credible evidence, s the courts acted. duh.

you are a legal *****.

You make a good point. Fraud cases were presented to courts without prior investigations so courts could not rule on the legitimacy of the voting fraud evidence.

 

[mark francis]

well you can't deny that independent experts did do investigations and found nothing.
and you can't deny that not a single court found your evidence credible.

here in america its up to you to prove your case, comrade

You avoid posting the times, dates, circumstances, and qualifications of the alleged investigators as well as fail to post any published results from these alleged investigations. That looks like nothing more than more lying democrat crap from looters and liars who falsely claimed the investigations into fraud had been completed almost before the polls closed on election day, which is clearly a load of crap.

 

[mark francis]

so the arizona gop inestigation found proof of fraud? no? lol.

well, cyber ninjas were morons, we can agree on that.

You do not say who investigated the Arizona fraud, when they investigated the fraud, or what they found in their investigation. You fail to convince others that you know what you are talking about.

 

[pjmret]

You do not say who investigated the Arizona fraud, when they investigated the fraud, or what they found in their investigation. You fail to convince others that you know what you are talking about.

yes i already posted the link many times for you. i'm not making up for your laziness. lol

 

[pjmret]

You avoid posting the times, dates, circumstances, and qualifications of the alleged investigators as well as fail to post any published results from these alleged investigations. That looks like nothing more than more lying democrat crap from looters and liars who falsely claimed the investigations into fraud had been completed almost before the polls closed on election day, which is clearly a load of crap.

i did post detailed information in a link to the investigtion a number of times to you.
i'm not making up for your laziness. lol

 

[mark francis]

yes i already posted the link many times for you. i'm not making up for your laziness. lol

No, you did not say who made up the panel of investigators, when they investigated, what they investigated, how thorough was their investigation, what investigative procedures they followed, and where their results were posted.

 

[mark francis]

i did post detailed information in a link to the investigtion a number of times to you.
i'm not making up for your laziness. lol

Details? Who were the investigators? What procedures did they follow? When did they conduct their investigation, why did they not initiate their investigation earlier, where did they post their qualifications and results, and did they convince conservatives that their investigation was not biased, flawed, or insufficient in scope?

 

[pjmret]

No, you did not say who made up the panel of investigators, when they investigated, what they investigated, how thorough was their investigation, what investigative procedures they followed, and where their results were posted.

the link had who they were, what they did, and their results.

you are welcome to contact them to find out more details like "how thorough" they were (lol). what a stupid question, as if anyone is going to explain to some random internet ***** how "thorough" they were.

they are licensed and certified auditors. If you think the certification process is invalid, contact the board that certifies them.

otherwise random internet morons whining about what actual credible certified auditors do is, well, stupid. lol

https://www.maricopa.gov/5681/Elections-Equipment-Audit

but just for you random internet election morons:

The multi-layered forensic audit is comprised of three separate audits performed by two United States Elections Assistance Commission Voting System Testing Laboratories and a Certified Public Accounting Firm.

The audit of the tabulation equipment’s software and hardware was performing by two independent Voting System Testing Laboratories: Pro V&V and SLI Compliance. The firms were hired to:

• Analyze election equipment software and hardware’s hacking vulnerability
• Verify that no malicious malware was installed
• Test that tabulators were not sending or receiving information over the internet
• Confirm that no vote switching occurred

As an added measure of transparency, the Board hired a reputable Certified Public Accounting firm, Berry Dunn, to review county contracts with Dominion Voting Services and verify that the county leased the tabulation equipment according to state and county procurement regulations. Read the report here.

 

[pjmret]

Details? Who were the investigators? What procedures did they follow? When did they conduct their investigation, why did they not initiate their investigation earlier, where did they post their qualifications and results, and did they convince conservatives that their investigation was not biased, flawed, or insufficient in scope?

contact the listed companies if you want to know more.

feel free to explain your qualifications to critique their processes. lol.



did they convince conservatives? why would that be a goal of theirs? lol. you arrogant morons are so, well, arrogant. lol

if you can't accept investigations by THREE independent, certified firms, you won't accept anything, and no one will bother trying.

 

[mark francis]

the link had who they were, what they did, and their results.

you are welcome to contact them to find out more details like "how thorough" they were (lol). what a stupid question, as if anyone is going to explain to some random internet ***** how "thorough" they were.

they are licensed and certified auditors. If you think the certification process is invalid, contact the board that certifies them.

otherwise random internet morons whining about what actual credible certified auditors do is, well, stupid. lol

https://www.maricopa.gov/5681/Elections-Equipment-Audit

but just for you random internet election morons:

The multi-layered forensic audit is comprised of three separate audits performed by two United States Elections Assistance Commission Voting System Testing Laboratories and a Certified Public Accounting Firm.

The audit of the tabulation equipment’s software and hardware was performing by two independent Voting System Testing Laboratories: Pro V&V and SLI Compliance. The firms were hired to:

• Analyze election equipment software and hardware’s hacking vulnerability
• Verify that no malicious malware was installed
• Test that tabulators were not sending or receiving information over the internet
• Confirm that no vote switching occurred

As an added measure of transparency, the Board hired a reputable Certified Public Accounting firm, Berry Dunn, to review county contracts with Dominion Voting Services and verify that the county leased the tabulation equipment according to state and county procurement regulations. Read the report here.

Nobody should trust sloppy or biased investigations.

 

[mark francis]

contact the listed companies if you want to know more.

feel free to explain your qualifications to critique their processes. lol.



did they convince conservatives? why would that be a goal of theirs? lol. you arrogant morons are so, well, arrogant. lol

if you can't accept investigations by THREE independent, certified firms, you won't accept anything, and no one will bother trying.

I already know Democrats got caught lying about their fraud even before they finished counting all the fake Biden ballots days after the election. Nobody should trust corrupted investigators who claimed the lying and looting crooks did not commit fraud.

 

[Phoenix68]

Nobody should trust sloppy or biased investigations.

.

.​