Voting machines can and do flip votes

[pjmret]

Wrong. Like mobs of dishonest or uninformed Biden supporters rushed to sign the leftist declaration that the Hunter Biden laptop was a lie, we had thousands of Biden supporters claiming just days after the election that evidence of voter fraud had been debunked when nobody had yet had time to investigate the evidence, and nobody had disproven it.

If your evidence was credible you wouldn't have lost every court case lol
You are an election *****

 

[pjmret]

Fraud is committed by lowlife crooks and is not debunked without investigations. Investigations into the massive evidence of fraud had not yet been done and there had not yet been enough time for the investigations to have been done, yet tens of thousands of lying leftists dishonestly insisted the evidence of fraud had been thoroughly investigated and disproven.

3 years isn't long enough for you idiots to find something credible?
Lol
You are an election *****

 

[mark francis]

Fraud is committed by lowlife crooks and is not debunked without investigations. Investigations into the massive evidence of fraud had not yet been done and there had not yet been enough time for the investigations to have been done, yet tens of thousands of lying leftists dishonestly insisted the evidence of fraud had been thoroughly investigated and disproven.

One of the most common retorts from lefties is "You did not prove it so it must not have been true." That argument is ridiculous, but lefties have found it very effective in fooling people into believing lies and rejecting the truth. Let's apply the demand for proof to their own dishonest claims about voting fraud.

Here is an article that came our just days after the election. The article was designed to fool the unintelligent into believing investigators had thoroughly examined every scrap of voter fraud evidence and found it all to be lies. Courts rejected voting fraud cases on the popular but erroneous assumption that voting fraud had already been disproven and any more investigations or court hearings involving voter fraud were just a waste of time.

No, Dominion voting machines did not delete Trump votes. - The New York Times (nytimes.com) 11-11-20

No, Dominion voting machines did not delete Trump votes. Prove it.

Published Nov. 11, 2020Updated Sept. 21, 2021

President Trump on Thursday spread new baseless claims (prove the claims are baseless) about Dominion Voting Systems, which makes software that local governments around the nation use to help run their elections, fueling a conspiracy theory that Dominion “software glitches” changed vote tallies in Michigan and Georgia last week.

The Dominion software was used in only two of the five counties that had problems in Michigan and Georgia, (that proves there were problems) and in every instance there was a detailed explanation for what had happened. In all of the cases, software did not affect the vote counts. (Unproven assertions do not serve as proof Trump was wrong.)

In the two Michigan counties that had mistakes, (more evidence of problems with Dominion machines) the inaccuracies were because of human errors, not software problems, according to the Michigan Department of State, county officials and election-security experts. (Commonplace appeals to authority fallacies are certainly not qualified as proof.) Only one of the two Michigan counties used Dominion software. (So? How does that prove Dominion machines were not corrupted?)

Issues in three Georgia counties had other explanations. (Unsupported explanations for the errors are not proof the errors did not occur or were void of criminal intent.) In one county, an apparent problem with Dominion software delayed officials’ reporting of the vote tallies, but did not affect the actual vote count. In two other counties, a separate company’s software slowed poll workers’ ability to check-in voters. (These are more instances of Dominion failures couple with unsupported claims of operators who had motivation to hide the fraud if fraud was indeed involved. That proves nothing in support of the statements by suspected corrupt election officials.)

 

[Boris Norris]

Fraud is committed by lowlife crooks and is not debunked without investigations. Investigations into the massive evidence of fraud had not yet been done and there had not yet been enough time for the investigations to have been done, yet tens of thousands of lying leftists dishonestly insisted the evidence of fraud had been thoroughly investigated and disproven.

Correct. It was investigated and found it didn't exist. You're getting warmer.

 

[mark francis]

Correct. It was investigated and found it didn't exist. You're getting warmer.

You claim the fraud was thoroughly investigated and the results of the investigation irrefutably proved the evidence of fraud was not accurate. That is a lie.

 

[Phoenix68]

No, Dominion voting machines did not delete Trump votes. - The New York Times (nytimes.com) 11-11-20

.

.​

 

[Phoenix68]

You claim the fraud was thoroughly investigated and the results of the investigation irrefutably proved the evidence of fraud was not accurate. That is a lie.

.

.

.​

 

[mark francis]

.
View attachment 8771
.​

Democrats: Shame on anyone attacking democracy by seditiously claiming Dominion machines corrupted the 2020 election. Since everybody knows that didn't happen, we advocate that no investigators examine the machines and no courts allow examiners to examine the machines.

 

[mark francis]

.​

.

.
View attachment 8773
.​

Democrats: Krebs has told us the 2020 election was the most secure in US history and we damn to hell any and all Americans who do not dutifully accept his unsupported claims.

 

[Boris Norris]

You claim the fraud was thoroughly investigated and the results of the investigation irrefutably proved the evidence of fraud was not accurate. That is a lie.

Again, only for the sake of the demented members. The GOP had their own audits and found nothing.

Now, if your evidence contravenes what your party believes, you'd better show it to them.
Alternatively you can whinging like a petulant child and accept he was beaten democratically and you lost. It says soon the Bible.

 

[pjmret]

One of the most common retorts from lefties is "You did not prove it so it must not have been true." That argument is ridiculous, but lefties have found it very effective in fooling people into believing lies and rejecting the truth. Let's apply the demand for proof to their own dishonest claims about voting fraud.

Here is an article that came our just days after the election. The article was designed to fool the unintelligent into believing investigators had thoroughly examined every scrap of voter fraud evidence and found it all to be lies. Courts rejected voting fraud cases on the popular but erroneous assumption that voting fraud had already been disproven and any more investigations or court hearings involving voter fraud were just a waste of time.

No, Dominion voting machines did not delete Trump votes. - The New York Times (nytimes.com) 11-11-20

No, Dominion voting machines did not delete Trump votes. Prove it.

Published Nov. 11, 2020Updated Sept. 21, 2021

President Trump on Thursday spread new baseless claims (prove the claims are baseless) about Dominion Voting Systems, which makes software that local governments around the nation use to help run their elections, fueling a conspiracy theory that Dominion “software glitches” changed vote tallies in Michigan and Georgia last week.

The Dominion software was used in only two of the five counties that had problems in Michigan and Georgia, (that proves there were problems) and in every instance there was a detailed explanation for what had happened. In all of the cases, software did not affect the vote counts. (Unproven assertions do not serve as proof Trump was wrong.)

In the two Michigan counties that had mistakes, (more evidence of problems with Dominion machines) the inaccuracies were because of human errors, not software problems, according to the Michigan Department of State, county officials and election-security experts. (Commonplace appeals to authority fallacies are certainly not qualified as proof.) Only one of the two Michigan counties used Dominion software. (So? How does that prove Dominion machines were not corrupted?)

Issues in three Georgia counties had other explanations. (Unsupported explanations for the errors are not proof the errors did not occur or were void of criminal intent.) In one county, an apparent problem with Dominion software delayed officials’ reporting of the vote tallies, but did not affect the actual vote count. In two other counties, a separate company’s software slowed poll workers’ ability to check-in voters. (These are more instances of Dominion failures couple with unsupported claims of operators who had motivation to hide the fraud if fraud was indeed involved. That proves nothing in support of the statements by suspected corrupt election officials.)

No you didn't win a sinle case so it must not have been credible

 

[pjmret]

Democrats: Krebs has told us the 2020 election was the most secure in US history and we damn to hell any and all Americans who do not dutifully accept his unsupported claims.

They are unsupported? What makes you say that? Do you work with him? No?
God hates when you lie

 

[mark francis]

Again, only for the sake of the demented members. The GOP had their own audits and found nothing.

Not true. Evidence of voting fraud and affidavits alleging eyewitness accounts of fraud emerged from around the nation just hours after polls closed. Leftists mouths began claiming just days after the election that the evidence had been examined thoroughly and irrefutably disproven, which was not even possible in that short of a time period. Democrats continue to lie to cover up their election fraud and have never disproven the majority of voting fraud evidence.

 

[mark francis]

No you didn't win a sinle case so it must not have been credible

You don't explain why courts took voting fraud cases before bipartisan investigations into the emerging evidence of fraud were authorized and carried out by election officials. Were courts expected to rule on the evidence before the evidence had been thoroughly examined?

 

[mark francis]

They are unsupported? What makes you say that? Do you work with him? No?
God hates when you lie

Yes, Democrats who claim the fraud cases were thoroughly examined by bipartisan experts and found to be false are lying. Democrats began lying about investigations almost as soon as the polls closed, proving they lied because there had not been sufficient time for investigations to have been authorized and initiated.