US government shutdown

How long will the shutdown last?

  • A few hours

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • A few days

    Votes: 8 57.1%
  • A few weeks

    Votes: 5 35.7%
  • Longer

    Votes: 1 7.1%

  • Total voters
    14
  • Poll closed .
If the sdministration keeps doing things like closing stores on military bades and leaving open BOs military golf courses people will get the idea who is being childish.
I think they are getting the idea already, and there seem to be plenty of children in Washington, all wearing suits and ties.
 
Werbung:
the-new-american-dream-2010.jpg

Government-Shudown-Now.png
 
PEOPLE OUTSIDE THE USAA ARE STILL PUZZLE BY THE TACTICS OF THE REPUBLICANS. Surely they realise they will get the blame. The ignorance of people who in one survey rejected obamacare but supported the Affordable health care bill is outstanding. They are both the same thing . Apparently the name makes them seem different. In the end Affordable Health care will be popular as it is in most countries. So the Republicans will lose again.
 
PEOPLE OUTSIDE THE USAA ARE STILL PUZZLE BY THE TACTICS OF THE REPUBLICANS. Surely they realise they will get the blame. The ignorance of people who in one survey rejected obamacare but supported the Affordable health care bill is outstanding. They are both the same thing . Apparently the name makes them seem different. In the end Affordable Health care will be popular as it is in most countries. So the Republicans will lose again.
Aus ...

I think you should start a thread on astrophysics instead of commenting on US politics ....

Although, I am sure you know nothing of astrophysics, it would make you sound so much more intelligent than attempting to comment on US politics!
 
PEOPLE OUTSIDE THE USAA ARE STILL PUZZLE BY THE TACTICS OF THE REPUBLICANS. Surely they realise they will get the blame. The ignorance of people who in one survey rejected obamacare but supported the Affordable health care bill is outstanding. They are both the same thing . Apparently the name makes them seem different. In the end Affordable Health care will be popular as it is in most countries. So the Republicans will lose again.

Your comment was very interesting. I had to look up the details. You are right:

In CNBC's third-quarter All-America Economic Survey it was found that 46 percent oppose Obamacare and 37 percent oppose the Affordable Care Act.

You seem to understand US politics more than the tea baggers here.
 
Your comment was very interesting. I had to look up the details. You are right:

In CNBC's third-quarter All-America Economic Survey it was found that 46 percent oppose Obamacare and 37 percent oppose the Affordable Care Act.

You seem to understand US politics more than the tea baggers here.
So, quoting a CNBC poll suggest one has an understanding of US politics?

Does it really surprise you that CNBC viewers do not know the difference between Obamacare and the Affordable Care Act?

Easy there Lag .... your own wacko liberal ignorance is shinning through here!
 
PEOPLE OUTSIDE THE USAA ARE STILL PUZZLE BY THE TACTICS OF THE REPUBLICANS. Surely they realise they will get the blame. The ignorance of people who in one survey rejected obamacare but supported the Affordable health care bill is outstanding. They are both the same thing . Apparently the name makes them seem different. In the end Affordable Health care will be popular as it is in most countries. So the Republicans will lose again.

IF...people around the world are puzzled, they are similar to those fools who do not know the difference between Obummercare and ACA.

Big centralized government, like the one you have in Aussieland, is not welcome in America by INFORMED Americans. Sadly, many western nations have fallen for the fallacy and weakness that is big government.

Sorry Mate, but you are not informed. Obummercare is NOT popular and it will NEVER BE...not in America...with exceptions for those too weak to realize that big government is NOT the solution. It is the PROBLEM.
 
Does it really surprise you that CNBC viewers do not know the difference between Obamacare and the Affordable Care Act?
Easy there Lag .... your own wacko liberal ignorance is shinning through here!
Does it really surprise you that CNBC viewers were NOT the basis of the poll and it was done by an outside organization in conjunction with the WSJ and had republican consultants?

Easy there TeaBag .... your own wacko extremist knee-jerk ignorance is shinning through here!
 
Does it really surprise you that CNBC viewers were NOT the basis of the poll and it was done by an outside organization in conjunction with the WSJ and had republican consultants?

Easy there TeaBag .... your own wacko extremist knee-jerk ignorance is shinning through here!
Well, considering you have not posted a link to the reference you are referring to, I would say that it should not be surprising for anyone to assume whatever they choose about your little claim here.

However, in reality your personal attacks already reflect that you not only don't have a clue what your talking about but, indeed don't have a legitimate point either!
 
Well, considering you have not posted a link to the reference you are referring to, I would say that it should not be surprising for anyone to assume whatever they choose about your little claim here.

However, in reality your personal attacks already reflect that you not only don't have a clue what your talking about but, indeed don't have a legitimate point either!
My gosh you are dripping with irony. My personal attacks? Surely you see that I was doing a parody of your personal attacks by using some of the very same words that you used.

Furthermore, in post #50 above your comment to Aussy was totally a personal attack where you weren't even curious if his post was true or not. I had the curiosity to look it up. That also makes your teabag drip with hypocrisy and irony.

As I remember, the poll was done by Hart Research. I didn't save the link so you will have to look it up for yourself, unless you operate with truthiness. Here, I'll give you a link to that:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truthiness.
 
My gosh you are dripping with irony. My personal attacks? Surely you see that I was doing a parody of your personal attacks by using some of the very same words that you used.

Furthermore, in post #50 above your comment to Aussy was totally a personal attack where you weren't even curious if his post was true or not. I had the curiosity to look it up. That also makes your teabag drip with hypocrisy and irony.

As I remember, the poll was done by Hart Research. I didn't save the link so you will have to look it up for yourself, unless you operate with truthiness. Here, I'll give you a link to that:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truthiness.
I am not interested in researching your liberal spin ....

If you had anything worth posting (as if any liberal does, now there's your "irony") you would post it with the correct links as most serious members do!

But, it's OK .... I can be tolerant .... I understand that it is a difficult task to legitimize any liberal BS and spin among informed members. Perhaps you should try democraticunderground .... they would be more your speed!
 
I am not interested in researching your liberal spin ....
Why am I not surprised.
If you had anything worth posting (as if any liberal does, now there's your "irony") you would post it with the correct links as most serious members do!

But, it's OK .... I can be tolerant .... I understand that it is a difficult task to legitimize any liberal BS and spin among informed members. Perhaps you should try democraticunderground .... they would be more your speed!
Ha. So you think it's my fault that you are not curious about polling evidence? Your tantrums are not a good substitute for research on your part. But as I see it you operate with truthiness which is not a good substitute for anything.

Here's a recursive irony. The poll showed that a percentage of the population was replete with truthiness, and you regard that poll with a different truthiness. Did you look up that word yet?
 
Werbung:
Back
Top