Prove itLife without parole is an appropriate sentence for lesser offenses.
Prove itLife without parole is an appropriate sentence for lesser offenses.
Like Trump's many crimes.Life without parole is an appropriate sentence for lesser offenses.
FTR: i think (even) mcvey should not have been executed.Trump is guilty as hell of what he was convicted of and a whole lot more. Trump is a narcissistic psychopath and cannot be rehabilitated. He should be incarcerated until he is no threat to anyone.
We should execute NOBODY unless the evidence is exceedingly clear. Like McVeigh, for example.
i doubt the veracity of this claim even though you put in quotes. any cite?You are right. Bill Ayers was the son of privileged prominent Democrats so he escaped a murder conviction, famously declaring as he exited the courtroom, "Guilty as hell but free as a bird."
blah blah blahAllowing the overwhelming majority of cold blooded murders off on lighter sentences for any reason is unjust.
actually it is.Innocent victims of guilty verdicts in criminal trials is no justification for doing away with guilty verdicts or appropriate sentences.
Seems a valid quote... from an Era long gonei doubt the veracity of this claim even though you put in quotes. any cite?
no one pushed for "light sentences". are you severely incompetent or severely dishonest?Families of murder victims do not think the murderers should be given light sentences. Light sentences for serious crimes are unjust.
Executing mass murderers for committing mass murder is justFTR: i think (even) mcvey should not have been executed.
i do not make inquiries like that lightly. i googled and only found one unfamiliar source. no nyt or wapo eg.Seems a valid quote... from an Era long gone
Mark obsessed about him
Being unjustly condemned is a result of human error and sin, as we have seen in Trump's unjust persecution by the wickedactually it is.
here:
Is it Better that Ten Guilty Persons Go Free Than that One ...
View attachment 16899
Office of Justice Programs (.gov)
https://www.ojp.gov › ncjrs › virtual-library › abstracts
by V Halvorsen · Cited by 48 — This article examines and attempts to interpret a 1769 doctrine that says, “the law holds that it is better that 10 guilty persons escape, than that 1 innocent ...
your opinion is no more valid than mine on face of it. but i have argument in favor of my position. i suspect you have none or crappy/religous ones.Executing mass murderers for committing mass murder is just
Prove itExecuting mass murderers for committing mass murder is just
Do you know how to use internet search engines? If so there is no excuse for you to doubt the truth of irrefutable factsi doubt the veracity of this claim even though you put in quotes. any cite?