These are the people Biden and Harris want to make peace with .

[mark francis]

Actually, humans are more closely related to apes, chimps, bonobos and orangutans.
Monkeys have tails, perhaps you also have a tail, bu humans and apes do not.

You repeat common secularist evolution narratives that are scientifically unsound and unproven.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

You repeat common secularist evolution narratives that are scientifically unsound and unproven.

Humans and chimps share 96% of the same DNA sequence.
It is sound and proven science.

Comparison of human and chimpanzee genomes reveals striking similarities and differences

The first comprehensive comparison of the genetic blueprints of humans and chimpanzees shows our closest living relatives share perfect identity with 96 percent of our DNA sequence, an international research consortium reported today. Led by scientists from the Broad Institute of the...

www.broadinstitute.org

Your silliest assumption is that proving evolution wrong means that the Bible story with the talking snake is true.
There is nothing in the Bible that is proven in the Bible. The Bible is full of contradictions, false folktales and gibberish.

 

[mark francis]

Humans and chimps share 96% of the same DNA sequence.
It is sound and proven science.

Comparison of human and chimpanzee genomes reveals striking similarities and differences

The first comprehensive comparison of the genetic blueprints of humans and chimpanzees shows our closest living relatives share perfect identity with 96 percent of our DNA sequence, an international research consortium reported today. Led by scientists from the Broad Institute of the...

www.broadinstitute.org

Your silliest assumption is that proving evolution wrong means that the Bible story with the talking snake is true.
There is nothing in the Bible that is proven in the Bible. The Bible is full of contradictions, false folktales and gibberish.

What low knowledge leftists fail to understand is that in some respects human and chimp DNAs share high degrees of similarity but in other aspects the similarities could fall below 70%.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

What low knowledge leftists fail to understand is that in some respects human and chimp DNAs share high degrees of similarity but in other aspects the similarities could fall below 70%.

DNA is DNA. 96% is the lowest comparative figure they give.
It is undeniable that apes and humans are closely related biologically.
Evolution is not a political issue, it is simply a fact.

Is there a gene for a soul? Apparently none has been discovered. So perhaps apes have souls, or humans do not.

 

[mark francis]

DNA is DNA. 96% is the lowest comparative figure they give.
It is undeniable that apes and humans are closely related biologically.
Evolution is not a political issue, it is simply a fact.

Is there a gene for a soul? Apparently none has been discovered. So perhaps apes have souls, or humans do not.

Nonsense. Chimp and human DNA is more than 90% similar if certain elements are ignored. If all aspects of DNA are considered in the comparison the similarities are in the low 70% range.

 

[the annoying thing]

Name them and proves they support hamas, mooron lol
I really like how consistently stupid you are

Your the stupid one for denying the truth and lying . then you use the old attack the poster tactic when the what about trump isn't working

Loading…

www.wsj.com

Full list of Democrats who refused to condemn Hamas supporters

Some 23 representatives, 22 Democrats and one Republican, opposed a resolution condemning supporters of Hamas and Hezbollah on college campuses.

www.newsweek.com

 

[pjmret]

Radiocarbon Dating of Dinosaur Fossils | TASC (tasc-creationscience.org) Nov 2013

Radiocarbon Dating of Dinosaur Fossils

Below is a list of some dinosaur fossils and their dated ages from the Miller paper. 6

• An allosaurus from the Morrison formation, late Jurassic, found in 1989 was dated by the University of Georgia by accelerator mass spectrometry. The age was found to be 31,360 ± 100 years old.
• The femur of an Upper Creataceous Hell Creek formation triceratops-like dinosaur (perhaps a new type of ceratopsid) found in 2007 was carbon-14 dated by the University of Georgia using accelerator mass spectrometry and found to be 39,230 ± 140 years old.
• Another Hell Creek formation dinosaur, found in 2004, a triceratops, was dated by the University of Georgia by accelerator mass spectrometry in 2009 as 24,340 ± 70 years old.
• An apatosaurus was found in late Jurassic strata of the Morrison formation, and excavation was done in 2007 and 2009. In 2011 the University of Georgia dated the fossil to 38,250 ± 160 years old.
• A hadrosaur’s hip bone was found in 2011 in the Hell Creek formation. The University of Georgia dated a sample from this bone to be 37,660 ± 160 years old.
• In 2012 a triceratops horn was found. The University of Georgia dated the fossil to be 33,570 ± 120 years old.
• A femur bone from a hardosaur in 2004 was found in the Hell Creek formation. The University of Georgia using accelerator mass spectrometry dated the sample to 25,670 ± 220 years old.
• An acrocanthosaurus (carnivorous dinosaur) specimen was excavated in 1984 near Glen Rose, Texas and was tested in 2010 by the University of Georgia. It was found to be 29,690 ± 90 years old.

Are the dates beyond the range of testing technology? No, the University of Georgia had extended the maximum limit up over 50,000 years, and the ages were all well below this. Are the ages still too old? After all, even though these ages are much younger than conventional ages, many creationists believe life on earth to be much younger than even the reported carbon-14 ages of these dinosaur fossils. This question will be dealt with in a later section of this article.

Radiocarbon in Dinosaur Bones Revisited: Problems with Collagen

Evidence from isotopes other than radiocarbon shows that dinosaur fossils are millions of years old. Despite that, bone mineral from Mesozoic dinosaur fossils yields a falsely young radiocarbon “date” of less than 50,000 years, due to its accumulation of new radiocarbon via recrystallization...

bioone.org

Recapitalization
Duh

The YEC literature is correct in stating that bones that are millions of years old have indeed lost all their original radiocarbon. But they have since accumulated new radiocarbon, which yields a falsely young radiocarbon “date.” To understand how that happens, let’s review the basics of radiocarbon contamination

https://skepticalinquirer.org/2022/10/dinosaur-bones-and-radiocar-bunkum/

Article from creation science you link is not credible science duh

You are a science moooron
God you are stupid lol

 

[pjmret]

Your the stupid one for denying the truth and lying . then you use the old attack the poster tactic when the what about trump isn't working

Loading…

www.wsj.com

Full list of Democrats who refused to condemn Hamas supporters

Some 23 representatives, 22 Democrats and one Republican, opposed a resolution condemning supporters of Hamas and Hezbollah on college campuses.

www.newsweek.com

So 23 people out of tens of millions duh

 

[pjmret]

Nonsense. Chimp and human DNA is more than 90% similar if certain elements are ignored. If all aspects of DNA are considered in the comparison the similarities are in the low 70% range.

Dna comparisons prove... what? Lol

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Dna comparisons prove... what? Lol

They seem to prove that chimpanzees and humans have a common ancestor from whom both evolved.

 

[pjmret]

They seem to prove that chimpanzees and humans have a common ancestor from whom both evolved.

I am thinking our local science mooron will try to fling around numbers he doesn't understand in a pathetic attempt to try to prove some scientific stupidity

 

[mark francis]

Radiocarbon in Dinosaur Bones Revisited: Problems with Collagen

Evidence from isotopes other than radiocarbon shows that dinosaur fossils are millions of years old. Despite that, bone mineral from Mesozoic dinosaur fossils yields a falsely young radiocarbon “date” of less than 50,000 years, due to its accumulation of new radiocarbon via recrystallization...

bioone.org

Recapitalization
Duh

The YEC literature is correct in stating that bones that are millions of years old have indeed lost all their original radiocarbon. But they have since accumulated new radiocarbon, which yields a falsely young radiocarbon “date.” To understand how that happens, let’s review the basics of radiocarbon contamination

https://skepticalinquirer.org/2022/10/dinosaur-bones-and-radiocar-bunkum/

Article from creation science you link is not credible science duh

You are a science moooron
God you are stupid lol

The secular labs guaranteed their results until the found out the bones were dinosaur. That is how leftist liars prop up false science.

 

[mark francis]

Dna comparisons prove... what? Lol

Are you uninformed about DNA comparisons also? There are many aspects of the different DNA that cannot even be compared so the secularists simply ignore those aspects to make the comparison numbers seem higher.

 

[mark francis]

They seem to prove that chimpanzees and humans have a common ancestor from whom both evolved.

Bad conclusion.

 

[pjmret]

The secular labs guaranteed their results until the found out the bones were dinosaur. That is how leftist liars prop up false science.

Science mooron claims scientists are wrong lol