There goes the god theory.

[Chauncey Gardner]

You claim it is fact but respectable researchers claim otherwise.

Chicxulub crater - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

In the late 1970s, geologist Walter Alvarez and his father, Nobel Prize-winning scientist Luis Walter Alvarez, put forth their theory that the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction was caused by an impact event.[5][6] ...

The Alvarezes' impact hypothesis was rejected by many paleontologists, who believed that the lack of fossils found close to the K–Pg boundary—the "three-meter problem"—suggested a more gradual die-off of fossil species.[6][10]

Hahahahaha

1970 eh?

Good God.

 

[Chauncey Gardner]

The big bang theory itself implies God because nowhere in science does nothing create matter

Oops you made another mistake. It is not necessary that nothing at all existed before the big bang.

 

[Chauncey Gardner]

Boris and 3 cells knowledge of science is that of a imbecile, they do not seem to be able to comprehend the meaning of Scientific Theory .
We are in our infancy of science . It is far from being accurate . there are several theory's not only as to where water came from but how the universe formed to how life started. The simple truth is no one know . Perhaps in a few hundred or thousand years if we are not destroyed by nature or ourselves we will learn and know more.
Science proves it self wrong all the time.
And a theory is really saying were guessing .

Many scientific theories are fact and will not change.

For example, all species on earth descend from a common ancestor. That's a fact.

Also, you need to understand a distinction.

We don't know exactly how abiogenesis occured. But that it did occur is a FACT.

 

[Chauncey Gardner]

What is being confirmed here is that the water in our solar system formed long before the sun formed.

 

[Tripoli]

Everything is not moving together. You just made that up, and you are 100% wrong.

You should probably stop posting and read and learn.

LOL the entire universe is expanding and you know this and as such are just trolling. Just for kicks can you tell us which parts of the universe are not expanding together in an outward direction?

Chauncy tea bag Gardner

 

[Tripoli]

Many scientific theories are fact and will not change.

For example, all species on earth descend from a common ancestor. That's a fact.

Also, you need to understand a distinction.

We don't know exactly how abiogenesis occured. But that it did occur is a FACT.

There is no such thing as a theory that is a fact. In fact the moment that a theory is proven as fact the theory vanishes in favor of the new fact.

But on the plus side, you are rather funny

 

[mark francis]

Many scientific theories are fact and will not change.

No, all species did not descend from a common ancestor. That is a theory beset with contradictions from science.

 

[Tripoli]

What is being confirmed here is that the water in our solar system formed long before the sun formed.

Actually nothing about stellar formation is being confirmed here, or there, or anywhere. If you believe otherwise put your confirmation up for peer review

 

[mark francis]

No it hasn't. Stop spreading lies.

OK. Let's then accept the fact that scientists now admit the theory is a theory that not everyone believes, as was pointed out here earlier with this quote:

Volcanic fury​

However, other scientists maintain that the evidence for a massive meteor impact event is inconclusive, and that the more likely culprit may be Earth itself.

 

[mark francis]

"Proofs" are for mathematics

Some theories are the.

True things are facts.

Yes, most scientific theories are facts.

No, scientific theories are not proven facts. Darwin theorized that all life on earth evolved from a single common ancestor and from there life evolved like branches on a tree. Ford Doolittle and others felled Darwin's theoretical scientific tree long ago.

 

[mark francis]

Ken ham? He's a proven charlatan.

You think? Well, I think Dawkins is the charlatan. Ben Stein certainly put him in his place in that one interview Dawkins was totally unprepared for.

 

[Tripoli]

No, all species did not descend from a common ancestor. That is a theory beset with contradictions from science.

Actually God could have seeded a planet with a primitive plant that would be able to photosynthesize and survive inhospitable conditions for mammals, that would have all the genetic material to evolve as conditions changed. At least this is what will be attempted on Mars shortly, and in tens or hundreds of thousands of years in the future when we have amassed Gods knowledge. So son what it means to be made in Gods image, is that you have his ability. Science is proving this every day

 

[Tripoli]

OK. Let's then accept the fact that scientists now admit the theory is a theory that not everyone believes, as was pointed out here earlier with this quote:

Volcanic fury​

However, other scientists maintain that the evidence for a massive meteor impact event is inconclusive, and that the more likely culprit may be Earth itself.

On its own the words volcanic fury have no meaning

 

[mark francis]

Actually God could have seeded a planet with a primitive plant that would be able to photosynthesize and survive inhospitable conditions for mammals, that would have all the genetic material to evolve as conditions changed. At least this is what will be attempted on Mars shortly, and in tens or hundreds of thousands of years in the future when we have amassed Gods knowledge. So son what it means to be lade in Gods image, is that you have his ability. Science is proving this every day

Why go to Mars to attempt to disprove God? Miller and Urey tried that and failed nearly 70 years ago.

 

[the annoying thing]

Many scientific theories are fact and will not change.

For example, all species on earth descend from a common ancestor. That's a fact.

Also, you need to understand a distinction.

We don't know exactly how abiogenesis occured. But that it did occur is a FACT.

I didst claim evolution did not happen and you can no more prove how life started then any one can prove god exists or not. A true open minded person who likes science who keep the possibility open because the FACT is YOU DO NOT KNOW FOR SURE.

Now I hate to do this to you but read this .

Abiogenesis is the idea of life originating from non-living material (non-life). This concept has expanded a great deal as mankind’s understanding of science has grown, but all forms of abiogenesis have one thing in common: they are all scientifically unsupportable. There have been no experiments demonstrating abiogenesis in action. It has never been observed in a natural or artificial environment. Conditions believed to have existed on earth are either incapable of producing the building blocks needed, or self-contradictory. No evidence has been found suggesting where or when such life might have generated. In fact, everything we know of science today seems to indicate that abiogenesis could not have happened under any naturally possible conditions.


Abiogenesis, as a field of scientific inquiry, is still in its infancy. It is not very far down the road of an accepted theory. The other leading theory is that life formed at hydrothermal vents in the deep sea. The heat and chemicals that would have been available there include naturally forming molecules that are "heavily featured in biology.

Its not FACT as you claim because it has not been proven , just as gods existence has not been proven or did proven. I am familiar with the 1952 experiment and no life was created and attempts to do so have all failed .

So as you can see its NOT FACT .I can say I think life came from space on a comet or asteroid its just as sound a claim as yours but can I prove it to be FACT .

Same with god I neither or you or any one can not prove he is real or not, No one said you or Boris or 3 cell have to believe. Maybe be a little more tolerant would be wise .

You believe in abiogenesis and thats fine and your right to . Just as its marks to believe what he wishes .