The Prophecies of Nostradamus

Boris Norris said:
You're wrong and that's just another ridiculous claim for which you have no evidence. He DID NOT corrupt voting machines and you know it. You are continually lying because you KNOW you cannot prove it.
Click to expand...
Whether he actually found a way to keep Trump from getting elected is immaterial. He at least had the opportunity and ability to manipulate elections by fraud which is even more reason Americans should not have allowed Democrats to block investigations of voting machines immediately after the 2020 election.
 
Werbung:
Boris Norris said:
Who said it was unrefuted? You?
Here's another example, I claim there's no god and you haven't proven there is so my claim is unrefuted.
Now do you see how stupid you are? I doubt it.
Click to expand...
Nobody proved hundreds of more voting machines were free from corruption after the 2020 election in spite of the statistically impossible high numbers of votes for Biden.
 
mark francis said:
Nobody proved hundreds of more voting machines were free from corruption after the 2020 election in spite of the statistically impossible high numbers of votes for Biden.
Click to expand...
Why were Biden's numbers impossible? What statistics said that?
No body had to prove they were corrupted. You did say that when Trump won. Only when you lose ay?
 
mark francis said:
Whether he actually found a way to keep Trump from getting elected is immaterial. He at least had the opportunity and ability to manipulate elections by fraud which is even more reason Americans should not have allowed Democrats to block investigations of voting machines immediately after the 2020 election.
Click to expand...
Democrats never blocked anything of consequences.
 
Boris Norris said:
Why were Biden's numbers impossible? What statistics said that?
No body had to prove they were corrupted. You did say that when Trump won. Only when you lose ay?
Click to expand...

Statistics is the science concerned with developing and studying methods for collecting, analyzing, interpreting and presenting empirical data.

Here is a report from the day after the election, when tens of thousands of unusually high numbers of late ballots for Biden were dumped into the race to offset Trump's lead on election night. Statistical analyses of thre data point to dumps of illegitimate ballots, or election fraud.

https://wentworthreport.com/2020/11...te-counts-and-their-effects-on-election-2020/ 11-25-20

High Quality Statisical Analysis: Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020.

Nearly every vote update, across states of all sizes and political leanings follow [the same] statistical pattern. A very small number, however, are especially aberrant. Of the seven vote updates which follow the pattern the least, four individual vote updates — two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin, and one in Georgia — were particularly anomalous and influential with respect to this property and all occurred within the same five hour window.

The four vote updates in question are:

  1. An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump
  2. An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump
  3. A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump
  4. An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump
This report predicts what these vote updates would have looked like, had they followed the same pattern as the vast majority of the 8,950 others. We find that the extents of the respective anomalies here are more than the margin of victory in all three states — Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia — which collectively represent forty-two electoral votes. …

In other words, these four vote updates alone won the vote count as it currently stands for Biden.
 
mark francis said:
That's not true. Several Americans were arrested for attempting to have voting machines examined that democrats never allowed to be examined by non-democrats. Never.
Click to expand...
Is that the instance where they waiting outside then forced their way in?
When were democrats on guard at the voting offices to prevent that?
 
mark francis said:
Statistics is the science concerned with developing and studying methods for collecting, analyzing, interpreting and presenting empirical data.

Here is a report from the day after the election, when tens of thousands of unusually high numbers of late ballots for Biden were dumped into the race to offset Trump's lead on election night. Statistical analyses of thre data point to dumps of illegitimate ballots, or election fraud.

https://wentworthreport.com/2020/11...te-counts-and-their-effects-on-election-2020/ 11-25-20

High Quality Statisical Analysis: Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020.

Nearly every vote update, across states of all sizes and political leanings follow [the same] statistical pattern. A very small number, however, are especially aberrant. Of the seven vote updates which follow the pattern the least, four individual vote updates — two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin, and one in Georgia — were particularly anomalous and influential with respect to this property and all occurred within the same five hour window.

The four vote updates in question are:

  1. An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump
  2. An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump
  3. A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump
  4. An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump
This report predicts what these vote updates would have looked like, had they followed the same pattern as the vast majority of the 8,950 others. We find that the extents of the respective anomalies here are more than the margin of victory in all three states — Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia — which collectively represent forty-two electoral votes. …

In other words, these four vote updates alone won the vote count as it currently stands for Biden.
Click to expand...
Let me guess. That was never tested in a court because democrats wouldn't let them . Thought so. Same old victim shit.
I'd blame the corrupt republican voting officials .
 
Boris Norris said:
Is that the instance where they waiting outside then forced their way in?
When were democrats on guard at the voting offices to prevent that?
Click to expand...
There were many instances of democrats forcefully resisting examinations of corruptible voting machines that democrats knew were vulnerable to corruption.
Some Voting Machines Still Have Decade-Old Vulnerabilities | WIRED
9-26-2019

Some Voting Machines Still Have Decade-Old Vulnerabilities

The results of the 2019 Defcon Voting Village are in—and they paint an ugly picture for voting machine security.

IN THREE SHORT years, the Defcon Voting Village has gone from a radical hacking project to a stalwart that surfaces voting machine security issues. This afternoon, its organizers released findings from this year's event—including urgent vulnerabilities from a decade ago that still plague voting machines currently in use.
 
Werbung:
mark francis said:
There were many instances of democrats forcefully resisting examinations of corruptible voting machines that democrats knew were vulnerable to corruption.
Some Voting Machines Still Have Decade-Old Vulnerabilities | WIRED
9-26-2019

Some Voting Machines Still Have Decade-Old Vulnerabilities

The results of the 2019 Defcon Voting Village are in—and they paint an ugly picture for voting machine security.

IN THREE SHORT years, the Defcon Voting Village has gone from a radical hacking project to a stalwart that surfaces voting machine security issues. This afternoon, its organizers released findings from this year's event—including urgent vulnerabilities from a decade ago that still plague voting machines currently in use.
Click to expand...
That's another example how your desperation to post something. It DOES NOT prove any corruption.
Get some evidence old man.
 
Back
Top