So much for the earth being 6000 years old.

Lucy is such a fake compilation of bones gathered from an area as large as Central Park that it is no surprise nobody was interested in seeing the fake on tour.
But people are interested, they are not interested in your atheist babbles
 
Werbung:
Lucy is such a fake compilation of bones gathered from an area as large as Central Park that it is no surprise nobody was interested in seeing the fake on tour.
But you would dispute the best science in the world. Some jumped up little brain dead godbotherer knows more about the earth than anyone on earth.
Do you ever read what you write? Is your family as dumb as you?
 
Closed minds are sealed in those who have determined to believe only what unsaved sinners tell them is true.
Would the fact you don't believe anything outside the Bible be a closed mind?
Unsaved sinners my arse.
Why would atheists want to save idiots like you if we could. If you're a fair representation of what's in heaven, God's a very poor judge.
 
What was that about 6000 years old?
This will hurt even more.
 
This will hurt even more.
Im sorry but the articles just keep coming. Had enough yet?

 
Im sorry but the articles just keep coming. Had enough yet?

This one doesn't mention the Bible either. How's those 6000 years going now comrade? Idiot.

 
You are entirely unqualified to denigrate the anthropologists that have studied Lucy. You appear to have the qualifications of a homeschooled hicktown bumpkin.

Smithsonian Says No to “Lucy”​

+++++++++++++++++​


Same Evidence, Two Different Views​

Even though Lucy is fairly complete for a mammal fossil (47 of 207 bones found), the bones are mostly small fragments with many pieces missing. That means scientists had to reconstruct the skeleton according to their preexisting beliefs about the fossil as to whether Lucy was an ape, human, or ape-man.
 

Smithsonian Says No to “Lucy”​

+++++++++++++++++​


Same Evidence, Two Different Views​

Even though Lucy is fairly complete for a mammal fossil (47 of 207 bones found), the bones are mostly small fragments with many pieces missing. That means scientists had to reconstruct the skeleton according to their preexisting beliefs about the fossil as to whether Lucy was an ape, human, or ape-man.
The creation museum wouldn't be biased. You have to be kidding.

You nutters will do and say anything to prove the greatest minds on earth know no more than the Bible. What a load of rubbish.
 
But you would dispute the best science in the world. Some jumped up little brain dead godbotherer knows more about the earth than anyone on earth.
Do you ever read what you write? Is your family as dumb as you?
The best science in the world has said Lucy is missing her hand and feet bones, eliminating any possibility of determining whether she climbed trees or walked uprightly. However, modern researchers have demonstrated evidence that Lucy was a tree climber, not a street walker.

X-rays suggest ironic end for famous human ancestor Lucy | PBS NewsHour 8-29-16

X-rays suggest ironic end for famous human ancestor Lucy
 
This will hurt even more.
The Cattedown fossils in England proved more than 100 years ago that evolutionist speculations are wrong. Furthermore, fossils taken from Bone Valley Florida also prove evolutionist speculations are wrong.
 
The creation museum wouldn't be biased. You have to be kidding.

You nutters will do and say anything to prove the greatest minds on earth know no more than the Bible. What a load of rubbish.
The bible does not say that the Earth is 6000 years old
 
Werbung:
You have been fooled because nowhere in the bible does it say that the Earth is 6000 years old. Sucker


No the bile wouldn't say that the Earth is 6000 years old. That book was written thousands of years ago.

But it's many christians who insist that the earth is 6000 years old. I'm just repeating what they claim.

If you don't like it, tell those christians they're suckers.
 
Back
Top