Dawkins. I don't know how many more times I have to say this for you to understand. Just because someone thinks that Jesus' message was better than Mo's doesn't make them a bible thumper. It doesn't even necessarily make them Christian. Jesus wasn't one.
You know that christian parents take their children to church as soon as they can and teach them about god at home. they certainly don't leave them to make their own mind up.
Well, all it takes is one instance to prove that wrong. My parents were two, and my husband and I are two more. So that's wrong.
Or do you think that by some miracle these different religions manifested themselves specifically in those regions?
If there was one true god surely he isn't sufficiently racist to only reveal himsefl in certain countries
Another history lesson. Read up on what the Asians did to Christian missionaries. I think Taoism is a great way to life your life. Basically: quit worrying about what you don't have, and appreciate what you do have". So why can't you just do that, while believing in the possibility of a greater entity, without being labeled? As I have said before, I consider myself a child of God, not any other label. You are doing the labeling.
You really have to suspend reason to be a christian don't you
.
Why, because you want to hang with people who have similar morals? Go to a Methodist church once. It’s more of a social gathering than demands to appease God. Catholicism is a different bird, IMO. The rules, the guilt trips, aren't about God. Any religion that tries to make you feel guilty about being human isn't about faith in God. It's about keeping people “sheeple”, and usually for taxation (middle ages) and donation (Now) purposes,
I wonder why god made believing in him so hard
.
It's not nearly as hard and defeating as waiting for man to come up with proof otherwise.
All you have done is spew about how stupid people who believe in God must be, but you forever have faith in man, a proven deficient being. Even history is being rewritten. History, that for all of modern times has been taken as truth because of "science". How can it be wrong now? They can’t even decide now when and who came to America now, because the changing date changed the geographical bridge. What next? Big Bang out the window?
I believe that what makes you have disdain for those who believe in God is that you think THEY think they are “looked after”, and they can’t prove that what is looking after them, is there. Not necessarily so. That’s religious doctrine, not faith in the existence of God.
Forever and ever God has been the beacon/exemplary standard for many to not get caught up in whatever changing moral concepts man thinks is O.K
Is God a concept or a being? The argument is moot. It always will be. You will never be able to PROVE me wrong, nor I you. The difference is that you think badly of those who believe in God, and I don’t care whether others do or not. What do you really win? The last word? Can’t see it, can’t touch it, therefore how can it have value? According to your way of thinking, it has none. So you win nothing.