Dawkinsrocks
Well-Known Member
Oh so you are a fan of paedophilia and predatory homosexuality?
I admire your candour if nothing else
I admire your candour if nothing else
Why are you such a but? I agree with their teachings on morality..Oh so you are a fan of paedophilia and predatory homosexuality?
I admire your candour if nothing else
If civil unions i s not a ballot option then you either vote your conviction or abandon it.THERE IS A VOTE ON SAme Sex marriage in AUSTRALIA AT PRESENT> I do not know how to vote I am against gay Marrage but think Gays should have the same rights as the restof us. They should have civil unions with same lgal rights as married people. However I think marriage should be confined to hetrosexuals who can compete the process.
THERE IS A VOTE ON SAme Sex marriage in AUSTRALIA AT PRESENT> I do not know how to vote I am against gay Marrage but think Gays should have the same rights as the restof us. They should have civil unions with same lgal rights as married people. However I think marriage should be confined to hetrosexuals who can compete the process.
Seems to me that human rights should override religious beliefs
But our friend Aus is Australian and not subject to our constitution. That said, marriage developed organically to represent an opposite sex union in societies the world over not any given religious dogma. The dogma simply reflected the reality.It seemed that way to he founders of this nation as well, yet we still have people who would base laws an policies on religion.
But our friend open mind is not, he is she? Do you agree with her that human rights should override religious rights?But our friend Aus is Australian and not subject to our constitution. That said, marriage developed organically to represent an opposite sex union in societies the world over not any given religious dogma. The dogma simply reflected the reality.
noDo you agree with her that human rights should override religious rights?
Then religion is more important that human rights? Explain.
Yes. But that doesn't apply here. OM isn't American either nor does she live here. I am fine letting other countries do what the will of their people say. My opinion only matters here in the good old US of A.But our friend open mind is not, he is she? Do you agree with her that human rights should override religious rights?
I understand his position but when you come to religions that have notions related to human rights that are incompatible with society, then you have a problem. Most societies are not ok with being not only free to harm people but called upon to kill them for a difference of opinion. One example from current events.Then religion is more important that human rights? Explain.
But our friend Aus is Australian and not subject to our constitution. That said, marriage developed organically to represent an opposite sex union in societies the world over not any given religious dogma. The dogma simply reflected the reality.