Obama Tax Increases

[pjmret]

How long after the election were the machines examined, who examined them by how detailed a process, and where did they publish the results of their investigation?

Google is your fried
I already posted this info
Stop being a lazy *****

 

[pjmret]

Lots of fraud deniers rejected the evidence of fraud but they do not irrefutably prove there was no fraud.

And you can't prove Trump didn't win by fraud in 2016
That's how the world works ***** lol

 

[pjmret]

The problem exists where the state process allows the voting machine owners to secure their machines from examination after elections.

Which states do that *****
List them

 

[pjmret]

If you claim reliable examinations were done that prove the examined machines were not corrupted, then you post that evidence. I don't know of any trustworthy examinations of voting machines that found no corruption.

Arizona was one *****
I already posted this

 

[pjmret]

One machine in Michigan flipped thousands of Trump votes to Biden but the machine flip got caught so Democrats made up excuses for why the flip happened.

Michigan County Flips from Biden to Trump After 'Glitch' Fixed

The election results for Antrim County, MI, have flipped from Biden to Trump after computer "software glitched and caused a miscalculation."

www.breitbart.com

Michigan County Flips from Biden to Trump After ‘Glitch’ Fixed​

Yes errors get caught by the state processes duh
Antrim is run by Republicans *****
And then results are certified duh

 

[Boris Norris]

Eheres you

Republicans tested mone machine in Antrim County and published the details of their methods and findings. Lying Democrats produced nothing to prove they conducted honest examinations of the machines while looking for evidence of corruption. Before 'examining' the machines they claimed the machines had not been corrupted. Then they claimed they examined the machines but did not prove they examined them and did not prove the examinations were sufficiently thorough. And then they claimed their examinations of the machines proved they were right in the first place that the 2020 election was one of the most transparent and honest elections in US history.

That is like having Al Capone investigate Al Capone, resulting in his declaration that he found Al Capone was one of the friendliest and most trustworthy, law-abiding Americans to have ever live

How so? Is it some kind or irrational fear to recognize Soros' connection to voting machines used in Venezuela, the Philippines, and the US?

Yes.

 

[mark francis]

Google is your fried
I already posted this info
Stop being a lazy *****

You cannot prove voting machines were examined by non-biased experts immediately after the 2020 election to determine if they had been corrupted because that did not happen.

 

[mark francis]

And you can't prove Trump didn't win by fraud in 2016
That's how the world works ***** lol

All credible evidence of fraud should be thoroughly investigated, unlike the obstructions to investigations that marked the aftermath of the 2020 election. Any credible claims of voter fraud occurred in 2016 should also have been investigated.

 

[mark francis]

Which states do that *****
List them

Republicans have found obstruction to investigating voter fraud in many states. This was in Pennsylvania:

Pa. Gov. Wolf, manufacturers want to keep Republican election investigation away from voting machines - pennlive.com

1. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTIONS

Pa. Gov. Wolf, manufacturers want to keep Republican election investigation away from voting machines

• Published: Dec. 18, 2021, 10:48 a.m.

By Marc Levy | The Associated Press
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — Gov. Tom Wolf’s administration and a voting-system manufacturer are trying to prevent Republican lawmakers from expanding what they call a “forensic investigation” of Pennsylvania’s 2020 election to a new front, inspecting voting machines.

 

[pjmret]

All credible evidence of fraud should be thoroughly investigated, unlike the obstructions to investigations that marked the aftermath of the 2020 election. Any credible claims of voter fraud occurred in 2016 should also have been investigated.

good thing there was no credible evidence. lol.
which is why you lost every election court case

 

[pjmret]

You cannot prove voting machines were examined by non-biased experts immediately after the 2020 election to determine if they had been corrupted because that did not happen.

arizona did for example

but lacking credible evidence otherwise, which you do lack, the standard certification process was followed and states certified the election.

you don't spend time and money because you lost the election and you can't accept that. well intelligent people dont

 

[pjmret]

Republicans have found obstruction to investigating voter fraud in many states. This was in Pennsylvania:

Pa. Gov. Wolf, manufacturers want to keep Republican election investigation away from voting machines - pennlive.com

1. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTIONS

Pa. Gov. Wolf, manufacturers want to keep Republican election investigation away from voting machines

• Published: Dec. 18, 2021, 10:48 a.m.

By Marc Levy | The Associated Press
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — Gov. Tom Wolf’s administration and a voting-system manufacturer are trying to prevent Republican lawmakers from expanding what they call a “forensic investigation” of Pennsylvania’s 2020 election to a new front, inspecting voting machines.

Mastriano has nevertheless argued that a more comprehensive probe involving the examination of equipment was needed. Earlier this month, he launched his "forensic investigation," starting with requests to Tioga, Philadelphia and York counties for access to their voting machines.

Tioga's three Republican commissioners have said they cannot comply, citing the likely cost to replace its machines. While Philadelphia has not commented on the matter, the Democratic stronghold is also expected to deny Mastriano's request.

At a meeting on Wednesday, York County Commissioner Julie Wheeler said a letter had been sent to Mastriano seeking clarity on various issues, including what audit firm would be used and who would pay for it.

Wheeler warned that replacing all York's voting equipment would cost more than $2.7 million, and said that "if there is support for a forensic analysis at the state level, it seems that all counties should be included" rather than just the current three.




sure, intelligent republicans also don't want these stupid biased audits because it will cost them money to pander to these election denying morons. duh its not "democrats" fighting the stupidity. duh

 

[mark francis]

Arizona was one *****
I already posted this

What did the experts supposedly look at in the machines, their hard drives? Their tabulators? Their memories? What? I understand that Democrat and Dominion officials are still blocking Republican examination of voting machines, which is why tens of millions of Americans believe the Democrats are hiding massive voting machine fraud in 2020.

 

[pjmret]

What did the experts supposedly look at in the machines, their hard drives? Their tabulators? Their memories? What? I understand that Democrat and Dominion officials are still blocking Republican examination of voting machines, which is why tens of millions of Americans believe the Democrats are hiding massive voting machine fraud in 2020.

again, which states are still being blocked by democrats, *****. list them. lol
but yes there are tens of millions of republican morons

 

[mark francis]

good thing there was no credible evidence. lol.
which is why you lost every election court case

Are you trying to say the claims of fraud were not investigated because there was no evidence of fraud to warrant an investigation or are you saying there was no evidence of fraud because there had been no investigation?