Obama Tax Increases

If you had researched you'd know that. You checked everything else.
Nobody has proven unbiased forensics investigators examined the machines immediately after the election to confirm the machines had not been corrupted. Democrats examining their own machines and then declaring themselves completely free from fraud does not convince millions of Americans that no fraud occurred. To convince Americans no fraud occurred the machines should have been forensically examined by unbiased experts who then posted their detailed findings.
 
Werbung:
Antrim county? Lol nothing mysterious it was human error *****
And yes if uncertified people have access to machines they are replaced because you don't know what they did *****
It's not too fragile it's about certification *****
When the errors are irrefutable the Democrats will claim the errors were harmless mistakes, but because Democrats will not allow non-biased experts to honestly and thoroughly examine the machines the Democrats prove they have some serious issues they wish to hide.
 
When the errors are irrefutable the Democrats will claim the errors were harmless mistakes, but because Democrats will not allow non-biased experts to honestly and thoroughly examine the machines the Democrats prove they have some serious issues they wish to hide.
Which errors are irrefutable *****
List them lying ***** lol

Which non biased experts were blocked by democrats
List them lying *****
 
You fail to prove the machines were thoroughly examined immediately after the election by trustworthy experts with no particular allegiance to the Democrat Party.
Arizona carried out a forensic audit for example by Independent experts ***** lol
 
You fail to prove the machines were thoroughly examined immediately after the election by trustworthy experts with no particular allegiance to the Democrat Party.
Every state has a process which they follow then they certify the election
All did that ***** lol
 
Every state has a process which they follow then they certify the election
All did that ***** lol
No, every state may have done superficial examinations of machines by biased or irresponsible examiners but only in Antrim County was a thorough examination done and Democrats fight like hell to deny the findings from that examination.
 
No, every state may have done superficial examinations of machines by biased or irresponsible examiners but only in Antrim County was a thorough examination done and Democrats fight like hell to deny the findings from that examination.
Prove they were superficial lying *****
 
No, every state may have done superficial examinations of machines by biased or irresponsible examiners but only in Antrim County was a thorough examination done and Democrats fight like hell to deny the findings from that examination.
Michigan Republicans rejected the findings too *****
Because they were wrong lol
 
Which errors are irrefutable *****
List them lying ***** lol

Which non biased experts were blocked by democrats
List them lying *****
One machine in Michigan flipped thousands of Trump votes to Biden but the machine flip got caught so Democrats made up excuses for why the flip happened.


Michigan County Flips from Biden to Trump After ‘Glitch’ Fixed​

 
Arizona carried out a forensic audit for example by Independent experts ***** lol
How long after the election were the machines examined, who examined them by how detailed a process, and where did they publish the results of their investigation?
 
Every state has a process which they follow then they certify the election
All did that ***** lol
The problem exists where the state process allows the voting machine owners to secure their machines from examination after elections.
 
Prove they were superficial lying *****
If you claim reliable examinations were done that prove the examined machines were not corrupted, then you post that evidence. I don't know of any trustworthy examinations of voting machines that found no corruption.
 
Werbung:
Back
Top