mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 26,990
You claim the testimony of witnesses is wrong about the high rejection rate of ballots that had to be adjudicated, but you offer no proof the rejection rates were lower.No the 68 percent was explained as a mistake by ***** ramsland duh
In actuality, the 68% figure is meaningless. Scanning a single ballot produces
a variable number of lines in the log file—ranging from two to dozens—often
including many benign warnings or errors. Many other entries and warnings
are generated during pre-election testing or while starting or shutting down the
machine. This means that the fraction of lines that are errors does not represent a
fraction of ballots or votes, the entities for which an error rate would be relevant
You are a ***** who believes a ***** who confuses MN and mi lol