Obama Tax Increases

[mark francis]

Democrats have 60 court rulings
You have zero
Duh

Democrats and judges talk about voter fraud but none of them can prove significant voter fraud did not occur.

 

[pjmret]

I keep agreeing. Judges cannot rule on the extent of voter fraud because they do not investigate voter fraud and can prove nothing.

I guess Republicans are morons because they are too stupid to give this evidence to judges lol

 

[pjmret]

Democrats and judges talk about voter fraud but none of them can prove significant voter fraud did not occur.

Yes that's how the legal system works ***** lol

 

[mark francis]

Proof no court thought was credible
You are a legend in your own mind lol

Whatever the court ruled on in voter fraud cases has nothing to do with the fact that judges do not investigate voter fraud and therefore cannot speak authoritatively about its extent.

 

[mark francis]

I have no evidence ofvoter fraud I agree duh
Your evidence has no credibility duh

You apparently have done no fraud investigations of your own and your dismissal of my evidence unseen is silly.

 

[mark francis]

I guess Republicans are morons because they are too stupid to give this evidence to judges lol

Nobody can present evidence in court that has been deleted by Democrats covering up the evidence of their fraud.

 

[mark francis]

Yes that's how the legal system works ***** lol

So, legally speaking, nobody can say authoritatively that significant voter fraud did not occur. If they did make that claim, how would they prove it?

 

[pjmret]

So, legally speaking, nobody can say authoritatively that significant voter fraud did not occur. If they did make that claim, how would they prove it?

Withcredibleevidence
Like any crime dih

 

[pjmret]

Nobody can present evidence in court that has been deleted by Democrats covering up the evidence of their fraud.

What evidence was deleted *****?

 

[pjmret]

You apparently have done no fraud investigations of your own and your dismissal of my evidence unseen is silly.

Why didn't you give your evidence to courts *****?

 

[pjmret]

Whatever the court ruled on in voter fraud cases has nothing to do with the fact that judges do not investigate voter fraud and therefore cannot speak authoritatively about its extent.

They speak authorities on the credibility of evidence presentr duh

 

[Boris Norris]

I see. Democrats ask me who they are going to believe, me or their lying eyes and lying propagandist masters.

You haven't told the truth for months yet expect us to believe you now.

 

[mark francis]

What evidence was deleted *****?

Here is the investigative report again. A judge in Michigan approved the report.

Forensic audit finds that security log files were deleted from all Dominion machines to hide vote switching | SGT Report

After election officials identified “glitches” that switched 6,000 Trump votes to Biden, the courts in Antrim County Michigan ordered an audit of Dominion voting machines. The forensic audit was carried out by the Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG). This group conducted a forensic duplication on the county’s election management server. They investigated compact flash cards used by local precincts in their Dominion ImageCast system, and they audited the memory sticks used by Dominion Voter Assist Terminals and the memory sticks used for the poll book.

This forensic audit found blatant evidence of a coordinated attack on the 2020 Presidential election. The Federal Election Commission allows an error rate of .0008 percent for all voting machines used in US elections. The Dominion machines in Antrim county had an error rate of 68.05 percent! Even more shocking: The ballot-adjudication logs and the security logs for the November 3 general election were removed. All log files for previous elections were still contained on the machines, but someone on the inside was able to erase the all-important log files for the 2020 election.

There was a coordinated attempt to coverup security logs that show wide scale vote switching

“The adjudication process is the simplest way to manually manipulate votes,” wrote Russell Ramsland, who prepared the forensic report. “The lack of records prevents any form of audit accountability, and their conspicuous absence is extremely suspicious since the files exist for previous years using the same software. We must conclude that the 2020 election cycle records have been manually removed.”

This bombshell report was released to the public on Dec 14 after it was approved by Kevin Elsenheimer, the chief judge of Michigan’s 13th Circuit Court.

 

[mark francis]

Why didn't you give your evidence to courts *****?

Courts show they do not want to get involved, and certainly do not want to be accused of claiming they can prove the fraud was insignificant.

 

[pjmret]

Courts show they do not want to get involved, and certainly do not want to be accused of claiming they can prove the fraud was insignificant.

They heard 60 cases ***** duh
Quite involved