Obama Digs for Dirt!!

[pjmret]

Nobody lied. Paul and you are both right. Here is a definition for "looked at:"

Judges did "look at" voter fraud cases brought before them, but they did not investigate or dig deeply into the evidence to see if fraud may have occurred since, as you have pointed out repeatedly, that was not their job. What judges did to the evidence can be described with words such as:
inspected
attended (to)
considered
set eyes on
What judges did not do thoroughly can be described as:

investigated
studied
probed
researched

No you both lied
Judges looked at the facts
You both are legal morons

 

[mark francis]

Did Bush try to fix the cfma or not *****

Bush joined in with other lawmakers to try to reign in the excesses brought on by the deregulation of the mortgage banking industry in the CFMA bill of 2000.

Move to Rein In Loan Buyers - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

Move to Rein In Loan Buyers

By The Associated Press

• May 26, 2005

WASHINGTON, May 25 - A House committee on Wednesday approved legislation that would strengthen federal oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the mortgage companies.

The bill, approved 65-5 by the House Financial Services Committee, falls short of the Bush administration's proposal to reduce the multibillion-dollar holdings of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Republicans are pushing to rein in the two government-sponsored companies that have been beset by accounting scandals. Efforts by Democrats to reshape the bill generally failed in the Republican-controlled committee.

 

[mark francis]

No you both lied
Judges looked at the facts
You both are legal morons

You said judges looked at the facts, yet you also claim judges did not investigate the voter fraud suggested by the facts. Did judges do voter fraud investigations or not?

 

[NEDFLANDERS]

They denied to examine any evidence at all.

 

[pjmret]

You said judges looked at the facts, yet you also claim judges did not investigate the voter fraud suggested by the facts. Did judges do voter fraud investigations or not?

No they don't investigate as I have said many times *****
They look at thr facts presented and evaluate them
God you are a legal ***** lol

 

[pjmret]

Bush joined in with other lawmakers to try to reign in the excesses brought on by the deregulation of the mortgage banking industry in the CFMA bill of 2000.

Move to Rein In Loan Buyers - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

Move to Rein In Loan Buyers

By The Associated Press

• May 26, 2005

WASHINGTON, May 25 - A House committee on Wednesday approved legislation that would strengthen federal oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the mortgage companies.

The bill, approved 65-5 by the House Financial Services Committee, falls short of the Bush administration's proposal to reduce the multibillion-dollar holdings of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Republicans are pushing to rein in the two government-sponsored companies that have been beset by accounting scandals. Efforts by Democrats to reshape the bill generally failed in the Republican-controlled committee.

So he didn't address the item you claimed cause the crisis
So you lied as always

 

[mark francis]

No they don't investigate as I have said many times *****
They look at thr facts presented and evaluate them
God you are a legal ***** lol

If they did not dig deep into the evidence, they likely missed the evidence of fraud buried as deeply as possible by crooks in an effort to conceal the crime.

 

[mark francis]

So he didn't address the item you claimed cause the crisis
So you lied as always

Don't try to claim Bush was not involved because he was.

Report: Bush, Republicans want tougher Freddie, Fannie regs - Jun. 15, 2005 (cnn.com)

Tighter leash on Freddie, Fannie urged Report: White House, GOP leaders want tougher controls on mortgage finance firms. June 15, 2005: 8:40 AM EDT ​ NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - The Bush administration and some Republican leaders in Congress are pushing for tighter regulation on mortgage financing firms Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, according to a published report.

 

[pjmret]

If they did not dig deep into the evidence, they likely missed the evidence of fraud buried as deeply as possible by crooks in an effort to conceal the crime.

They looked at all facts presented. That is what judges do ***** and come to a conclusion

If the evidence you morons presented isn't credible then you lose duh
Are you saying Trump people intentionally hid the proof of fraud in what they gave to the judge so they would lose? Lololol

So Rand was wrong and you two are legal morons

 

[pjmret]

Don't try to claim Bush was not involved because he was.

Report: Bush, Republicans want tougher Freddie, Fannie regs - Jun. 15, 2005 (cnn.com)

Tighter leash on Freddie, Fannie urged Report: White House, GOP leaders want tougher controls on mortgage finance firms. June 15, 2005: 8:40 AM EDT ​ ​ ​ NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - The Bush administration and some Republican leaders in Congress are pushing for tighter regulation on mortgage financing firms Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, according to a published report.

So Bush did nothing on the cause the cfma as you claimed was the cause
He was lazy and ignored it

 

[mark francis]

They looked at all facts presented. That is what judges do ***** and come to a conclusion

If the evidence you morons presented isn't credible then you lose duh
Are you saying Trump people intentionally hid the proof of fraud in what they gave to the judge so they would lose? Lololol

So Rand was wrong and you two are legal morons

The most fraud likely occurred in the voting machines that very few investigators were even allowed to partly examine. Voting machines are clearly vulnerable to fraud and corruption and allowing Democrats to totally control, operate, and restrict access to the machines while taking them at their word that they would never use voting machines to commit fraud is unwise and even un-American, bordering on criminal sedition.

 

[pjmret]

The most fraud likely occurred in the voting machines that very few investigators were even allowed to partly examine. Voting machines are clearly vulnerable to fraud and corruption and allowing Democrats to totally control, operate, and restrict access to the machines while taking them at their word that they would never use voting machines to commit fraud is unwise and even un-American, bordering on criminal sedition.

Nothing there showing judges didn't look at all the facts presented ***** lol

Rand lied and you two are legal morons

 

[mark francis]

So Bush did nothing on the cause the cfma as you claimed was the cause
He was lazy and ignored it

Bush was involved and you make yourself look foolish by denying it.


Frank haunted by stance on Fannie, Freddie - The Boston Globe

Falcon sent his report to Frank and other Financial Services Committee members and asked that Fannie and Freddie be required to disclose more about their finances and be subject to tougher oversight. He followed it up with another report in June 2003.

A few months later, the Bush administration said it would try to rein in the enterprises by creating a regulatory authority within the Treasury to oversee them.

The warning signs were compounded by revelations in 2003 and early 2004 that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae had misstated earnings by billions of dollars in an effort to meet growth targets.

But Frank and other Democrats still opposed tighter regulation, Frank most notably in his public statements saying there was nothing wrong with Fannie and Freddie. He and other House Democrats also sent a letter to President George W. Bush in June 2004, saying the proposed crackdown could “weaken affordable housing performance . . . by emphasizing only safety and soundness.’’

 

[mark francis]

Nothing there showing judges didn't look at all the facts presented ***** lol

Rand lied and you two are legal morons

You still show no evidence that judges examined the voting machines before Democrats could erase incriminating evidence. Fraud by voting machine was massive, just like it was in Venezuela years earlier with some of the same people providing voting machines in both places.

 

[pjmret]

Bush was involved and you make yourself look foolish by denying it.

View attachment 6200
Frank haunted by stance on Fannie, Freddie - The Boston Globe

Falcon sent his report to Frank and other Financial Services Committee members and asked that Fannie and Freddie be required to disclose more about their finances and be subject to tougher oversight. He followed it up with another report in June 2003.

A few months later, the Bush administration said it would try to rein in the enterprises by creating a regulatory authority within the Treasury to oversee them.

The warning signs were compounded by revelations in 2003 and early 2004 that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae had misstated earnings by billions of dollars in an effort to meet growth targets.

But Frank and other Democrats still opposed tighter regulation, Frank most notably in his public statements saying there was nothing wrong with Fannie and Freddie. He and other House Democrats also sent a letter to President George W. Bush in June 2004, saying the proposed crackdown could “weaken affordable housing performance . . . by emphasizing only safety and soundness.’’

Quote his involvent with changing the cfma act specifically ***** duh