Democrats are doing great damage to the US by their corruption. Democrats did steal the 2020 election and the worst part is that so many of those who know they committed the crime are unjustly imprisoning their innocent fellow Americans for protesting against the crime. Democrats are beyond and below despicable for such atrocities.Thats the point you fyckwit. He didn't expose anything. He had no evidence and neither did the GOP.
Now it's the bent prosecutors. Everyone is against him. What a load of crap . Nothing to do with stealing classified documents and threatening no use the secrets to destroy America. He said as much yesterday.
I would like it to reach the SC before his personally appointed godbothering republican judges and see the same verdict.
Both. Fannie Mae was pumping out millions of taxpayer dollars in contributions to Democrats like Obama, among its other atrocities, which is why Democrats did not want Fannie Mae reined in.You said the problem was cfma not Freddie and Fannie which is it
So when you said the problem was cfma you liedBoth. Fannie Mae was pumping out millions of taxpayer dollars in contributions to Democrats like Obama, among its other atrocities, which is why Democrats did not want Fannie Mae reined in.
Courts looked at some facts and drew erroneous conclusions, but no court looked at all the facts or even half the facts.Rand said the courts didn't look at facts and you agreed with him
I posted proof they did
You two legal morons lied as you admitted
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) desire to have "functional regulation" of the market was also rejected.Both. Fannie Mae was pumping out millions of taxpayer dollars in contributions to Democrats like Obama, among its other atrocities, which is why Democrats did not want Fannie Mae reined in.
Whatever facts were not included in whatever case in question were not even looked at by the judge in that case.What facts that were presented to them didn't they look at *****?
What facts presented to them didn't they look at *****Courts looked at some facts and drew erroneous conclusions, but no court looked at all the facts or even half the facts.
Yes the problem was CFMA that gave Americans the false impression that Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac would cover the bad loans everyone knew the CFMA was sure to generate.So the problem wasn't cfma? Why did you lie?
So you and Rand are complaing about judges not looking at facts not given to themWhatever facts were not included in whatever case in question were not even looked at by the judge in that case.
So Bush ignored fixing the real problemYes the problem was CFMA that gave Americans the false impression that Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac would cover the bad loans everyone knew the CFMA was sure to generate.
The ones they did not address, I suppose. No court looked at all the evidence of voter fraud in one court case. That would have been impossible by a large margin.Which facts presented to courts were not looked at *****
We had a financial collapse be ause of American impressions of an act 99 percent had never heard ofYes the problem was CFMA that gave Americans the false impression that Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac would cover the bad loans everyone knew the CFMA was sure to generate.
Give examples of facts given to them they didn't address *****The ones they did not address, I suppose. No court looked at all the evidence of voter fraud in one court case. That would have been impossible by a large margin.
Was it facts they had or ones they didn'tThe ones they did not address, I suppose. No court looked at all the evidence of voter fraud in one court case. That would have been impossible by a large margin.
Not complaining, just pointing out the obvious fact that US judges never irrefutably debunked all evidence of voter fraud from 2020.So you and Rand are complaing about judges not looking at facts not given to them
My God I haven't met anyone as stupid as you lol
